Pte 6466 T4 803whp/559 tq. Comparison between 6265 & 6466 also!
Apr 24, 2012, 08:41 AM
#17
Thank you for the kind words. Words cannot describe how happy I am with the results. Car pulls like freight train. It just keeps going and going. I think I need to invest in 4:11.
I'm still getting used to the power. Already drove it pretty hard with less than 500 miles on it. If it's built right, then it should hold up, right?
I'm still getting used to the power. Already drove it pretty hard with less than 500 miles on it. If it's built right, then it should hold up, right?
Apr 24, 2012, 09:02 AM
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can certainly see why Scott would opt for minimum waste gate springs in a safe fail safe boost range. Most people don't recognize that for a waste gate boost drop safeguard feature to work, minimum waste gate pressure has to be in a safe range with ECU controlled boost to work. I would leave the springs alone for a while until you get used to it and then maybe add like 3psi stronger combo that should support +6psi in boost control range on top.
Now you are making me have to go back to the Dyno and make 805whp lol!
Now you are making me have to go back to the Dyno and make 805whp lol!
Apr 24, 2012, 03:48 PM
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will have a 6266 on kill to post next week. Car is fully road tuned at 40lbs but we are tapering to 36lbs around 9Krpm. Pulled the hotside today and it is being ported substantially to see if that will help hold boost out the top.
We are going to push it to 44 lbs on the dyno and hopefully hold above 40lbs to redline. Should be a fun dyno comparison to this 6466 and 6265 graphs.
We are going to push it to 44 lbs on the dyno and hopefully hold above 40lbs to redline. Should be a fun dyno comparison to this 6466 and 6265 graphs.
