EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Pte 6466 T4 803whp/559 tq. Comparison between 6265 & 6466 also!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2012, 01:07 PM
  #46  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
SmurfZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what was the un-corrected numbers?


"Edit" I don't think Kev has them. Cars a beast though
Last edited by SmurfZilla; Apr 26, 2012 at 11:24 PM.
SmurfZilla is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:01 PM
  #47  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,398
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Nice numbers.

What were they uncorrected?
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
what was the un-corrected numbers?
Yes please
JohnBradley is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:29 PM
  #48  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Anarchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it may be time Jesse looks into 1.5" runner ts manifold!
Anarchy99 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:31 PM
  #49  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
EvoDan2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Anarchy99
I think it may be time Jesse looks into 1.5" runner ts manifold!
what gives the reason to do that?
EvoDan2004 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:37 PM
  #50  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Anarchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evodan2004
what gives the reason to do that?
I'll go on a limb and say on that power level it's starting to become a hindrance and building up back pressure.
Anarchy99 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:46 PM
  #51  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
EvoDan2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Anarchy99
I'll go on a limb and say on that power level it's starting to become a hindrance and building up back pressure.
yea i can see that beginning to happen. i know a bigger runner manifold would help but do you think at his level its worth the 1000+ price tag to make the change?
EvoDan2004 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 03:01 PM
  #52  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
JDL Auto Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anarchy99
I think it may be time Jesse looks into 1.5" runner ts manifold!
Ive built them before...i do agree you would see a difference goin forward from this level...how much and if it would be worth it... i dont know. Fitment becomes an issue with the big runner stuff, 2 gates etc while maintaining a/c , full size radiator etc.
Last edited by JDL Auto Design; Apr 26, 2012 at 03:05 PM.
JDL Auto Design is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 03:16 PM
  #53  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
EvoDan2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by JDL Auto Design
Ive built them before...i do agree you would see a difference goin forward from this level...how much and if it would be worth it... i dont know. Fitment becomes an issue with the big runner stuff, 2 gates etc while maintaining a/c , full size radiator etc.
how about mid size runner. known as schedule 10 i think.
EvoDan2004 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 05:11 PM
  #54  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
way2qik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: With my admirers in the BACK ROOM!
Posts: 651
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Very nice!!!!!!!
way2qik is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 05:26 PM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Anarchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evodan2004
how about mid size runner. known as schedule 10 i think.
Schedule 10 represents the thickness of the metal not the runner size
Anarchy99 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 06:21 PM
  #56  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
JDL Auto Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anarchy99
Schedule 10 represents the thickness of the metal not the runner size
The inner diameter is slightly larger on some elbows...i prefer sch 40 for durability however
JDL Auto Design is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 06:29 PM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
SmurfZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
English gentleman. LOL.
SmurfZilla is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 26, 2012, 06:51 PM
  #58  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
EvoDan2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Anarchy99
Schedule 10 represents the thickness of the metal not the runner size
Originally Posted by JDL Auto Design
The inner diameter is slightly larger on some elbows...i prefer sch 40 for durability however
correct. Anarchy99 what i meant was the ID ''inside diameter'' is bigger then a standard 1.25 runner. basically meaning if you have 1.25 and 1.50 then schedule 10 is like 1.40.

if i explained that correctly.

Auto Design do you see that being worth it for this car or no
EvoDan2004 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 27, 2012, 02:12 PM
  #59  
AMF
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (26)
 
AMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: US
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Yes please
I'll ask Justin see if he can send me one.

Originally Posted by JDL Auto Design
Ive built them before...i do agree you would see a difference goin forward from this level...how much and if it would be worth it... i dont know. Fitment becomes an issue with the big runner stuff, 2 gates etc while maintaining a/c , full size radiator etc.
Scott mentioned bigger runner would probably yield more hp, but like Jesse said, fitment issue with bigger runner. I'm not ready to toss my my ac or do half cut rad. Summer time in GA is no joke. unless i can strap a dyno fan on my dash

Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
English gentleman. LOL.
+1 LOL.
AMF is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 27, 2012, 03:10 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member

iTrader: (42)
 
Boltz.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome power curve, but looks wildly wavy for a DJ at 5 smoothing. Would like to see the graph on 0 or 1 smoothing....

What were you using for the RPM pickup?
Boltz. is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Pte 6466 T4 803whp/559 tq. Comparison between 6265 & 6466 also!


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 PM.