Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Fully built evo9 6262 STM AEM... 630whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2012, 01:28 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
k20turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fully built evo9 6262 STM AEM... 630whp

Had it tuned on a mustang dyno last night and I am pretty happy how it turned out!

STM ff manifold
ETS intercooler
custom piping
AEM ems
GSC S2's
Built 2.0

630whp and 454wtq @32psi





Made 609 on this pull
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht7-6wssgxcv
Old Jun 27, 2012, 01:35 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
bbyevo8u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
nice man!! how does it feel on the road?
Old Jun 27, 2012, 01:36 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EvoIIIAj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 748
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car looks great! Nice power too!
Old Jun 27, 2012, 01:54 PM
  #4  
Newbie
 
BubbaKush's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy lagg, I'm guessing this is on pump gas?
Old Jun 27, 2012, 01:57 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
KaRboN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New YoRk
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it put down that much on a mustang dyno/Pump,Prob E85..Nice numbers but Why does it spool so late ?
Old Jun 27, 2012, 02:18 PM
  #6  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Justin at STM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great work and thank you for supporting us!
Old Jun 27, 2012, 03:08 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dragracer187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Dragstrip
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why such lag?
Old Jun 27, 2012, 03:30 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
4G63 T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bec its 2.0
Old Jun 27, 2012, 04:12 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
k20turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys, yeah 2.0 and non bb 6262 would be my guess.

Fuel was VP C12

Justin@stm, I love your products this actually the manifold off the ricer
Old Jun 27, 2012, 04:51 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2003evo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FLO-RIDA
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BubbaKush
Holy lagg, I'm guessing this is on pump gas?
Don't think that power is pump gas
Old Jun 27, 2012, 04:58 PM
  #11  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
you really need to swap those s2 out for s3. the power is falling off uptop.. thats the last thing you want with your setup. your setup is designed to make power uptop more so then downlow, and s2's are not what you want in that head.

i love the shop name though..
Old Jun 27, 2012, 05:16 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
KaRboN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New YoRk
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tscompusa
you really need to swap those s2 out for s3. the power is falling off uptop.. thats the last thing you want with your setup. your setup is designed to make power uptop more so then downlow, and s2's are not what you want in that head.

i love the shop name though..
S3's are overkill on a 2.0 and usually only used on stroker motor's from what i read and gathered by talking to a lot of shops/people .. You don't think so ??
Old Jun 27, 2012, 05:57 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
batty200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That lag is terrible for a 6262. Look at badEVO's thread and see his power band is much wider. That looks like a 6766 power band.
Old Jun 27, 2012, 06:01 PM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by KaRboN
S3's are overkill on a 2.0 and usually only used on stroker motor's from what i read and gathered by talking to a lot of shops/people .. You don't think so ??
the s3 will target more of a top end window vs a low end window. ive read the same thing you have as well.. ive seen results they vary. i think the car would gain quite a bit with s3 vs s2 with that turbo on that 2.0L
Old Jun 27, 2012, 06:04 PM
  #15  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by batty200
That lag is terrible for a 6262. Look at badEVO's thread and see his power band is much wider. That looks like a 6766 power band.
ya its laggy for sure.. btw email me .. i did receive your message on answering machine.

-- edit

k20turbo verify your timing belt isn't off a tooth or something.. something is definitely wrong. if its not mechanical
then the tune must not have good AFR/Timing for spooling a turbo.. thats all i can think of.

or maybe there's a boost leak.

Last edited by tscompusa; Jun 27, 2012 at 06:11 PM.


Quick Reply: Fully built evo9 6262 STM AEM... 630whp



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 AM.