TS HTA3076 93oct
#33
Here is a comparison of last night vs this morning.
The only reason power fell some in the 5K-6K range was because it moved into another load cell that had 1deg less timing. I confirmed it in the logs. It likes 9deg there and it only got 8. Potentially it could be from a ham-fisted move on my part after advancing it to 10 only to find the car didn't like that, and then thinking I was putting back to 9deg My dyno road is not secluded and after 3-4 pulls it attracts the wrong kind of attention so I get outta there after 3 regardless of outcome.
The only reason power fell some in the 5K-6K range was because it moved into another load cell that had 1deg less timing. I confirmed it in the logs. It likes 9deg there and it only got 8. Potentially it could be from a ham-fisted move on my part after advancing it to 10 only to find the car didn't like that, and then thinking I was putting back to 9deg My dyno road is not secluded and after 3-4 pulls it attracts the wrong kind of attention so I get outta there after 3 regardless of outcome.
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Here I am trying to crack 500whp on a mustang dyno with meth with a ams 3076, can you explain how yours differs aside from the 1.03 and the twin scroll?
My setup is built 2L ported stm intake manifold/buscher 65mm/gsc 1 cams/ams tubular manifold, best I could get was 355mustang on 91 octane.
Never thought ppl would want to step it up to a 280 cam or so for a non gtx 3076..
My setup is built 2L ported stm intake manifold/buscher 65mm/gsc 1 cams/ams tubular manifold, best I could get was 355mustang on 91 octane.
Never thought ppl would want to step it up to a 280 cam or so for a non gtx 3076..
Last edited by Grimgrak; Jan 7, 2013 at 11:10 PM.
#41
Thanks dude!
All the specs are in the first post. I'm using the high lift 276Kelfords to take advantage of the CNC ported head's additional airflow. The turbo is an HTA3076 so it moves a similar amount of air to the GTX3076.
Here I am trying to crack 500whp on a mustang dyno with meth with a ams 3076, can you explain how yours differs aside from the 1.03 and the twin scroll?
My setup is built 2L ported stm intake manifold/buscher 65mm/gsc 1 cams/ams tubular manifold, best I could get was 355mustang on 91 octane.
Never thought ppl would want to step it up to a 280 cam or so for a non gtx 3076..
My setup is built 2L ported stm intake manifold/buscher 65mm/gsc 1 cams/ams tubular manifold, best I could get was 355mustang on 91 octane.
Never thought ppl would want to step it up to a 280 cam or so for a non gtx 3076..
#42
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
I disagree. you would be right if the egg was covering the whole pan. the vast majority of the pan is in contact with the air. bottom line is the pan surface does indeed stay cooler so there is less heat to cook the egg. the heat does go to the atmosphere. I have measured the engine compartment tempts and felt the torque loss several times. so this is stupid bench racing and a waste of time for me.