BrowningDerek Tuned Evo9 RS BBK Full
Feb 28, 2013, 06:12 AM
#1
BrowningDerek Tuned Evo9 RS BBK Full
422hp 353tq 28psi tapering to 25
car feels great and pulls like crazy. this car was always knock happy and so inconsistent. we figured out i had a MIVEC map that wasnt working to well with my setup so that was changed and tweaked some more and this was the final results. back to back pulls were all close together number wise and it runs and pulls so smooth now!
rest of my mods in my sig!
car feels great and pulls like crazy. this car was always knock happy and so inconsistent. we figured out i had a MIVEC map that wasnt working to well with my setup so that was changed and tweaked some more and this was the final results. back to back pulls were all close together number wise and it runs and pulls so smooth now!
rest of my mods in my sig!
Last edited by vmrevo9; Feb 28, 2013 at 06:14 AM.
Feb 28, 2013, 06:16 AM
#2
Post the log in the actual virtual dyno. Evoscans version inflates the numbers much more than virtual dyno. My guess is this is going to show sub 400whp. I can take a log that shows 550whp in Evoscan and put it into Virtual dyno and it will show 500whp with the same settings.
Also, you need to post multiple runs showing similar power numbers if you want to claim numbers.
Also, you need to post multiple runs showing similar power numbers if you want to claim numbers.
Last edited by evo8426; Feb 28, 2013 at 06:23 AM.
Feb 28, 2013, 07:42 AM
#4
<p>Also there all tuning tools whether you tuned it on new virtual dyno...dynojet....mustang dyno etc its all gonna be diff. inportan e is baseline vs post tuning to see how much power you made. People get hung up on numbers when we all know each dyno is gonna be diff. Hell I was getting tuned in Jacksonville for a while by mase and he straight up told me it would read 20whp lower than dynojet so what numbers would I claim?. Its really irrelevant.</p>
Feb 28, 2013, 08:25 AM
#5
yeah i was tuned by mase too at one point. he also told me that the dyno read lower than a dynojet.
my first pull was 404hp but i dont remember the torque but with how inconsistent the car was the hp number would fluctuate more than normal
my first pull was 404hp but i dont remember the torque but with how inconsistent the car was the hp number would fluctuate more than normal
Trending Topics
Feb 28, 2013, 10:43 AM
#11
<p>e85 definetly pulls a hell of alot of torque out too. Just seen a guys dyno graph on stock intake mani and exhaust mani. Only thing he had was bbk full cams and injectors and he made 386 on mustang dyno on pump gas.
Last edited by RussellDaniel; Feb 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM.
Feb 28, 2013, 12:36 PM
#15
eventually i would like to do a 2.2l and maybe upgrade to the BBK C at that time but for now i'll enjoy this combo. i may add an intake manifold of some type whether it be the ported stocker or a magnus i'll do my usual research and see what i decide on.
Last edited by vmrevo9; Feb 28, 2013 at 03:11 PM.