Efr7670 2.4l 9rs
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
It would be interesting however to see the difference between an SXE versus EFR and similar size all other variables being equal.
#32
Not true. The reason why a SS spools slower than a TS is because the AR is not equal. For example a 1.0 t4 open and a 1.0 t4 twin. The twinscroll spools like a .50 t4 open and should make around the peak power of a .80 t4 open. like @letsgetthisdone said it was a stock block. So the timing was conservative, as well as it spooling slower than a 2.4. The car spooled nearly 700rpm sooner on my 93 pump tune because it made 100whp less and he didn't have to worry as much about the rods saying bye bye. I'd like to see what it would do on a built 2.0 maxed out and full send on timing, I'm sure it would spool nearly Identical to the 7670. Also a twinscroll helps more keeping the car in boost between shifts than anything else.
#33
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Shamsiel
Not true. The reason why a SS spools slower than a TS is because the AR is not equal. For example a 1.0 t4 open and a 1.0 t4 twin. The twinscroll spools like a .50 t4 open and should make around the peak power of a .80 t4 open. like @letsgetthisdone said it was a stock block. So the timing was conservative, as well as it spooling slower than a 2.4. The car spooled nearly 700rpm sooner on my 93 pump tune because it made 100whp less and he didn't have to worry as much about the rods saying bye bye. I'd like to see what it would do on a built 2.0 maxed out and full send on timing, I'm sure it would spool nearly Identical to the 7670. Also a twinscroll helps more keeping the car in boost between shifts than anything else.
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Not true. The reason why a SS spools slower than a TS is because the AR is not equal. For example a 1.0 t4 open and a 1.0 t4 twin. The twinscroll spools like a .50 t4 open and should make around the peak power of a .80 t4 open. like @letsgetthisdone said it was a stock block. So the timing was conservative, as well as it spooling slower than a 2.4. The car spooled nearly 700rpm sooner on my 93 pump tune because it made 100whp less and he didn't have to worry as much about the rods saying bye bye. I'd like to see what it would do on a built 2.0 maxed out and full send on timing, I'm sure it would spool nearly Identical to the 7670. Also a twinscroll helps more keeping the car in boost between shifts than anything else.
#35
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
#38
So can you explain to me why all the high HP drag builds use open t4 housings? If TS housings make uncompromised power then why are they not using them? It’s because it’s a trade of, you don’t get the peak hp you would get running a TS housing of the same size. There’s about an 20% difference in peak efficiency up top.
#39
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (4)
So can you explain to me why all the high HP drag builds use open t4 housings? If TS housings make uncompromised power then why are they not using them? It’s because it’s a trade of, you don’t get the peak hp you would get running a TS housing of the same size. There’s about an 20% difference in peak efficiency up top.
Would be a shame to see this great build thread derailed with an unrelated argument.
#43
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
"May want to consider the proven Racefab oil pan or a clone If track days are going to be the norm with a big tire/aero."
100% I have a moroso/ams pan, and over fill the oil 1/2qt. I log oil pressure pretty closely with the motec dash. Never saw less than 25lbs oil pressure (still scares me). The main saving grace I think is the terrible, low grip Achillies tires I had to run. I looked around for a racefab pan when for a bit but it was a difficult item to get ahold of. This is NOT a track car for me but I do want a street car I can take to a track once a year. I will be adding a accusump and staying away from big grippy slicks.
The current setup is as follows.
255's Achillies 123s 220TW
Ohlins road and track. As delivered spring rates. Not swapped front and rear.
WhiteLine 26mm bars front and rear. Rear on middle setting. WL end links.
WL ball joints and tie rod ends up front and offset bushings in rear toe arm.
Stock bushings otherwise (class rules) These move quite a bit when strapping the car to the trailer.
Front C2.8 T0 Rear C2.3 T1mm in per side.
Restacked stock rear diff
English racing ACD tune. Settled on the tarmac setting to tame the oversteer.
Stoptech rotors, carbotech ap10/12 combo. The brakes boiled the paint off the calipers every 2 laps. To be fair they never failed just would degrade. That's saying something for 160mph stops.
I fully understand this is not optimized but this is quite comfortable on the street. First laps I have turned in the car so wanted a baseline before adding much more in the way of parts. These tires were chunking and lasted 8-10 laps total and 80% of a lap before overheating no matter how nice I drove. The power of the car was enough to drive around the issues and ended up taking home 1st place in class this weekend. I have a few of Dallas's arms waiting for the car now that I don't have to worry about the rules.
The following 2 users liked this post by eflove:
Abacus (Feb 17, 2020),
Gtimportfanatic (Feb 18, 2020)
#44
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Shamsiel
So can you explain to me why all the high HP drag builds use open t4 housings? If TS housings make uncompromised power then why are they not using them? It’s because it’s a trade of, you don’t get the peak hp you would get running a TS housing of the same size. There’s about an 20% difference in peak efficiency up top.
#45
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
I'm working on a different solution at the moment, hopefully will be tested in a few months.
Make sure to keep an eye on your cold and hot oil pressures (via oil temp). This will indicate when your oil pump is beyond help and needs to be replaced.
If you're currently 85-95 psi oil pressure at 80ºC oil temp, when your pump is dying it will go down to 75psi, 70psi, 65psi etc etc.