Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 8.9 RMC 2.2 FP red

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2023 | 02:39 AM
  #16  
CurseDSM's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 213
From: Pinckney, Michigan
Originally Posted by LetsGetThisDone
Thanks .... ( ? ) lol



The longest rod that should be used with the 94mm in the 4g64 block is a 159mm. Longer rod, and the compression distance gets too short (it's around 1.011"), the pin is almos into the 2nd compression ring (goes above the oil ring set), and weird things happen.

We've revved the the 94mm to 9500 with 150mm rods in the 4g63 standard deck blocks. Haven't seen any issues that would be related to piston speed, or lack of rod ratio. So on 4g63 motors, we only bother with custom 153mm rods if we're doing aluminum rods. Because the 153mm Carrillos get pricey.

People obsess over rod ratios in the 4g, and I think they forget, or just don't know, that most Honda engines happily rev where ever the head decides to stop flowing with rod ratios less than 1.6:1.

Example: the B18. 89mm stroke, 137mm rod. 1.54 rod ratio. Dudes yank those things out junkyard Integras and rev them 9k with a rod/piston build.

94/150 for a 4g is a 1.595 rod ratio for comparison.
That was the info I was looking for when I had to rebuild my 2.4. I asked the shop how is it that Honda's can rev to the moon on a 2.4 but yet a Mitsu can't and they really didn't give me an answer. They said basically we have tried all the combo's for the 4g and this is what has had the best results so I went with it. Good info thank you.
Old Jan 5, 2023 | 06:46 AM
  #17  
TimC909's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 140
Likes: 18
From: Lancashire, UK
I don’t know if any body listens to the Hidden Horsepower podcast by Total Seal but pretty much every guest that goes on says the same things in this topic when building an engine. Pick your capacity first, design your piston second then use the rod length that fits third.
Old Jan 5, 2023 | 12:21 PM
  #18  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,875
Likes: 1,579
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by CurseDSM
That was the info I was looking for when I had to rebuild my 2.4. I asked the shop how is it that Honda's can rev to the moon on a 2.4 but yet a Mitsu can't and they really didn't give me an answer. They said basically we have tried all the combo's for the 4g and this is what has had the best results so I went with it. Good info thank you.
IMO it comes down to the stroke is longer. Not so much the rod ratio. Of course the crazy drag guys are revving 500hp methanol K27's to the moon, but I'm sure those things don't last all that long

Originally Posted by TimC909
I don’t know if any body listens to the Hidden Horsepower podcast by Total Seal but pretty much every guest that goes on says the same things in this topic when building an engine. Pick your capacity first, design your piston second then use the rod length that fits third.
Yeah pretty much.
Old Jan 6, 2023 | 11:43 AM
  #19  
Gtimportfanatic's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 62
Likes: 3
From: CT
Is this an SS red? Or mhi style? And where do you think your compression lands?
Old Jan 6, 2023 | 12:04 PM
  #20  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,875
Likes: 1,579
From: Las Vegas
It's an MHI red. Compression in this engine ended up calculating to 9.2:1 static compression.
The following users liked this post:
alpinaturbo (Jan 20, 2023)
Old Jan 11, 2023 | 11:44 AM
  #21  
Ayoustin's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 605
From: Detroit
If I were to ever move from the stock frame stuff I'll likely be an Artec mani with a Xona turbo. Every year I bug BW about making reverse rotation EFRs. Or if Garrett would do aluminum center cartridges...

The G30-770 seems like a logical step up from an MHI red. For track use I don't think you'll see much loss in transient response as long as the engine isn't being bogged.
The following users liked this post:
dr_latino999 (Mar 31, 2023)
Old Jan 12, 2023 | 03:19 AM
  #22  
Gtimportfanatic's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 62
Likes: 3
From: CT
I think people often forget how laggy turbos used to be lol, the G series turbos are leaps and bounds ahead with response and i think its the perfect unit for power/response
Old Jan 20, 2023 | 11:04 AM
  #23  
TimC909's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 140
Likes: 18
From: Lancashire, UK
So when is the G30-770 going on Sean?
Old Jan 20, 2023 | 12:58 PM
  #24  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,875
Likes: 1,579
From: Las Vegas
Hoping to have time in february
Old Mar 27, 2023 | 10:13 AM
  #25  
Steveevo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 5
From: Perth, Australia
G’day Sean,

I’ve always liked your build particularly because it’s using the FP Red & producing the power/torque it makes. It has brilliant torque & it producers it so early in the rpm range on your stroker. It’s a pity your Red has finally let go, what caused the Red to fail?

The FP Red is at the top of my stock framed turbo list, if I decided to move up from the stock IX turbo, maybe the UHF version.

I’m very glad you hung around on the forum (so many left) as you always give advice to forum members. The forum is lucky to have you.

Last edited by Steveevo9; Feb 22, 2024 at 07:35 AM.
Old Mar 27, 2023 | 07:55 PM
  #26  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,875
Likes: 1,579
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Steveevo9
G’day Sean,

I’ve always liked your build particularly using the FP Red & producing the power/torque it makes. It has such brilliant torque & it producers it so early in the rpm range on your stroker. It’s a pity your Red has finally let go, what caused the Red to fail?

The FP Red is at the top of my stock framed turbo list, if I decided to move up from the stock IX turbo, maybe the UHF version.

I’m very glad you hung around on the forum (so many left) as you always give advice to forum members. The forum is lucky to have you.
The red finally gave up probably because to get the curve you see was a maxed turbo. It would not make more boost. About 38-39psi on the hit, falling off to 27 out the top. Ran it like that on the street for probably 8-10k miles. Shaft speeds unknown, but I'm sure it was well beyond what Robert would have approved lol

Thanks for the kind words
The following 2 users liked this post by LetsGetThisDone:
staywide8 (Mar 28, 2023), Steveevo9 (Mar 27, 2023)
Old Mar 31, 2023 | 07:29 PM
  #27  
dr_latino999's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Likes: 18
From: Central TX
Originally Posted by LetsGetThisDone
Thanks .... ( ? ) lol



The longest rod that should be used with the 94mm in the 4g64 block is a 159mm. Longer rod, and the compression distance gets too short (it's around 1.011"), the pin is almos into the 2nd compression ring (goes above the oil ring set), and weird things happen.
That's the math and reasoning (mostly sold by R/T Ernie) that led me to a 94 Manley billet, 159 R&R, a Wiseco pistons a decade ago (still going strong). I just wanted a larger 4G63 that was happy revving to the high heavens, while minimizing as many downsides (real or imagined) as possible.
Old Apr 3, 2023 | 09:28 PM
  #28  
MasterNater's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 866
Likes: 22
From: Tupelo, MS
If memory serves, you had an FP manifold before. Any significant weight difference between the FP and Artec?
Old Apr 4, 2023 | 11:44 AM
  #29  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,875
Likes: 1,579
From: Las Vegas
The artec is lighter, but I didn't weigh it for comparison.
Old Apr 4, 2023 | 12:24 PM
  #30  
TimInselman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 63
Likes: 11
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by LetsGetThisDone
The red finally gave up probably because to get the curve you see was a maxed turbo. It would not make more boost. About 38-39psi on the hit, falling off to 27 out the top. Ran it like that on the street for probably 8-10k miles. Shaft speeds unknown, but I'm sure it was well beyond what Robert would have approved lol

Thanks for the kind words
How do you think the UHF version with a SS housing would compare to the MHI?


Quick Reply: Evo 8.9 RMC 2.2 FP red



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:40 PM.