Impressions on the EVO6.5 RS T.M.E Titanium shaft turbocharger?
#46
Yup. Baseline, dyno, dyno-tune, post all of the above. When I first started looking into this (two weeks ago) I couldn't find anyone with these specific mods who had done all these exact same mods on a new car.
I figured that posting my baseline, then doing this upgrade grouping and reposting would help out those folks who are new to the car and it's mod path like myself. I've sifted through a lot of the archives finding a lot of helpful but more often than not useless information. In most cases, the baseline included a couple goodies already such as an intake, MBC, etc.
If, Ted, you don't see any merit to my post then you're more than welcome to disregard it.
Sam
I figured that posting my baseline, then doing this upgrade grouping and reposting would help out those folks who are new to the car and it's mod path like myself. I've sifted through a lot of the archives finding a lot of helpful but more often than not useless information. In most cases, the baseline included a couple goodies already such as an intake, MBC, etc.
If, Ted, you don't see any merit to my post then you're more than welcome to disregard it.
Sam
#47
I certainly see the merit in it.
I have a true, bone stock baseline of my own car, followed by its subsequent dyno tuned Stg 1+ with 10.5t configuration, done all in one shot and all graphed onto the same chart. I'll post it tomorrow.
I have a true, bone stock baseline of my own car, followed by its subsequent dyno tuned Stg 1+ with 10.5t configuration, done all in one shot and all graphed onto the same chart. I'll post it tomorrow.
#48
I can't wait. It would be even better if we were both using the same dyno....and octane of fuel (I'm stuck with 92 here in WA) It will be really interesting to see the difference between just the 10.5 housing and the TI shaft and 10.5 housing as I understand you only have the housing correct?
Sam
Sam
#49
The actual dyno numbers shouldn't matter because the percentage difference should be about the same. The chart I'll post reflects 93 oct.
Actually, I have the entire 10.5t unit, which includes the larger housing *and* the Ti internals.
Actually, I have the entire 10.5t unit, which includes the larger housing *and* the Ti internals.
#54
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
TD05HRA-16G6-10.5t
and finally..
TD05HRA-15GK2-10.5t (the True Evo 6.5 TME Turbo)
and finally..
TD05HRA-15GK2-10.5t (the True Evo 6.5 TME Turbo)
I have the TD05HRA16G6-10.5T on my car, and I _love_ it. Together with a SSa/DNP style header, it made about 1.5 times the power of my 264/264 cams throughout the powerband. Just putting it on made a 20+whp gain everywhere, meaning a really nice amount of midrange torque!
#55
Thanks for pointing that out, actually there's alot of bad information out there about the TME's and the turbos used for different models.. My turbo is the TD05HRA-16G6-9.8t, but I upgraded the compressor cover with an MR cover, and the hot side housing with a 10.5t.. I'm really looking forward to finally running it. And the TME turbos are very expensive, but the one I recall being $2000 was indeed the smaller of the two turbos.. at the time I was researching it I wasn't aware of the difference between the two though.
#56
Originally Posted by EvoSam
Ted, where's that dyno chart?
The charts reflect stock, vs.:
10.5t Turbo
HKS 272, set at -3/-3 with Vishnu Gears
3" Vishnu turboback
AMS lower IC pipe
255lph pump
650cc FIC injectors
Xede + Xflash and dyno tuning courtesy of Shiv and Dyno4mance
Pump fuel, "secret sauce" is a bit of xylene thrown in it.
Catalytic converter intact
304DD = ~ 352 Dynojet
Last edited by Ted B; Nov 17, 2004 at 06:57 PM.
#59
Originally Posted by Az3ar
I would install the 2871 to see what happens but I wont change my 3071
Thanks,
jcnel.
#60