FQ-400 turbo
Dec 22, 2004, 09:04 PM
#16
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you pick up the current issue of Evo Magazine it give all the details on the FQ 400. They feel that for point to point driving the FQ320 is much better car. The 400 doesn't really get on the power until about 5000rpms. Then there is the price for the car. At about 46,000 pounds it would probably be about $60k or more. 400 hp at the crank might not sound like much but this car will come with a full warranty and based on the build level it will last much longer that just cranking the boost levels.
Dec 23, 2004, 06:59 AM
#18
Originally Posted by Willie Dynamite
That's like $2k in parts alone.
MBC - 50 - 115
Flash - 200
Fuel Pump - 90
Cams - 550
Install the stuff yourself dude. That's 1490 in parts.
With these parts and lower IC pipe (225), O2 housing (115), HKS RS (275) I made 340 on a Mustang Dyno. Which reads lower than a Dynojet, which means close to 450 HP at the motor for 1490, plus 3 parts that MIGHT make 10 HP put together to total 2105 of which 615 is not really necessary. Why spend more????
Last edited by EVOTEXAS; Dec 23, 2004 at 07:02 AM.
Dec 23, 2004, 07:05 AM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
Turboback - 600
MBC - 50 - 115
Flash - 200
Fuel Pump - 90
Cams - 550
Install the stuff yourself dude. That's 1490 in parts.
With these parts and lower IC pipe (225), O2 housing (115), HKS RS (275) I made 340 on a Mustang Dyno. Which reads lower than a Dynojet, which means close to 450 HP at the motor for 1490, plus 3 parts that MIGHT make 10 HP put together to total 2105 of which 615 is not really necessary. Why spend more????
MBC - 50 - 115
Flash - 200
Fuel Pump - 90
Cams - 550
Install the stuff yourself dude. That's 1490 in parts.
With these parts and lower IC pipe (225), O2 housing (115), HKS RS (275) I made 340 on a Mustang Dyno. Which reads lower than a Dynojet, which means close to 450 HP at the motor for 1490, plus 3 parts that MIGHT make 10 HP put together to total 2105 of which 615 is not really necessary. Why spend more????
You can do it even cheaper.
Cat delete 52.00 shipped to your door
Muffler Delete: 105 shipped to your door
Cams 272 525.00 shipped
ECUFlash Turbotrix 375 custom tuned
Pump 90
MBC 25 bucks
$1172 335-350 whp on dyno jet
Dec 23, 2004, 08:18 AM
#20
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
Turboback - 600
MBC - 50 - 115
Flash - 200
Fuel Pump - 90
Cams - 550
Install the stuff yourself dude. That's 1490 in parts.
With these parts and lower IC pipe (225), O2 housing (115), HKS RS (275) I made 340 on a Mustang Dyno. Which reads lower than a Dynojet, which means close to 450 HP at the motor for 1490, plus 3 parts that MIGHT make 10 HP put together to total 2105 of which 615 is not really necessary. Why spend more????
MBC - 50 - 115
Flash - 200
Fuel Pump - 90
Cams - 550
Install the stuff yourself dude. That's 1490 in parts.
With these parts and lower IC pipe (225), O2 housing (115), HKS RS (275) I made 340 on a Mustang Dyno. Which reads lower than a Dynojet, which means close to 450 HP at the motor for 1490, plus 3 parts that MIGHT make 10 HP put together to total 2105 of which 615 is not really necessary. Why spend more????
$1490+$275=$1765
What tbe is $600?
Dec 23, 2004, 10:02 AM
#25
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
I also said that the intake was not needed to make the power and was just a part I have installed. I don't know why you didn't say that....
Dec 23, 2004, 10:06 AM
#26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: aptos,ca
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol why try to be like the fq400 while you can pump out higher no#'s with some stateside vendors 
ams or bushur turbokits and stroker kits then supporting mods and youll be there in not time or even way past it 
ams or bushur turbokits and stroker kits then supporting mods and youll be there in not time or even way past it
Dec 23, 2004, 10:27 AM
#27
yea spend 1500 on the cheapest parts available and have a car with 350 whp that just slips the stock clutch. i guess we can just get a cheap *** vdo boost gauge for 30$ and drill it into the dash also. if your gonna do cams you "should" do head studs also so thast another 100$ cant believe megan exhaust is 600 for turboback, theres gotta be some reason its so cheap. is it stainless?? mandrel bent?? do you get a muffler??
Dec 23, 2004, 10:31 AM
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NOLIMITMOTORS
yea spend 1500 on the cheapest parts available and have a car with 350 whp that just slips the stock clutch. i guess we can just get a cheap *** vdo boost gauge for 30$ and drill it into the dash also. if your gonna do cams you "should" do head studs also so thast another 100$ cant believe megan exhaust is 600 for turboback, theres gotta be some reason its so cheap. is it stainless?? mandrel bent?? do you get a muffler??
Why do you need headstuds??? If you runing the stock turbo Head studs are not really need. IE WASTE OF MONEY. we are just saying it can be done for Cheap.
Dec 23, 2004, 10:57 AM
#29
Originally Posted by NOLIMITMOTORS
yea spend 1500 on the cheapest parts available and have a car with 350 whp that just slips the stock clutch. i guess we can just get a cheap *** vdo boost gauge for 30$ and drill it into the dash also. if your gonna do cams you "should" do head studs also so thast another 100$ cant believe megan exhaust is 600 for turboback, theres gotta be some reason its so cheap. is it stainless?? mandrel bent?? do you get a muffler??
you don't need headstuds and from what I hear, the ARPs aren't that good anyways. you're just regurgitating what you hear online, nothing more. try thinking on your own sometime.
Dec 23, 2004, 11:55 AM
#30
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
Why do you need headstuds??? If you runing the stock turbo Head studs are not really need. IE WASTE OF MONEY. we are just saying it can be done for Cheap.
Eric