Turbulence
#1
Turbulence
I am afraid that I may be on the path to creating a slight bottleneck in the exhaust system and giving way to boost/exhaust turbulence.
Heres the setup that is most likely going in:
- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)
As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?
Heres the setup that is most likely going in:
- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)
As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?
Last edited by spoolingEVOx; Dec 30, 2004 at 09:46 PM.
#2
Originally Posted by spoolingEVOx
I am afraid that I may be on the path to creating a slight bottleneck in the exhaust system and giving way to boost/exhaust turbulence.
Heres the setup that is most likely going in:
- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)
As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?
Heres the setup that is most likely going in:
- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)
As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?
3% difference in area. no big deal.
#7
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by kimletrim
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?
Piping is piping - one is not made out of gold or chocolate - both will gave almost the same HP - its just all in the tuning
#10
Originally Posted by YellowFever
good thing - no - I rather have more top end than low-end - thats why I opt for 3" all the way. Even David Buschur from Buschur Racing recommends it
maybe not a good thing for you, but i love a little bit of torque down low to compensate for the high end power.
#11
Originally Posted by kimletrim
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?
i already have an hks hi-power that is going in after february. i love the sound these exhausts produce and the quality/craftsmanship behind them.
not sure about the WORKS HFC. i've seen the helix and i am very, very impressed. guess that remains to be determined.
the main reason i'm going with the WORKS downpipe is because its the only 3" on the market that doesnt interfere with the lower tie bars or the oil pan. (i think)
#12
only turbulance you should be worrying about on a turbo car is the intake to intake manifold.
you could get a erratic a/f reading which somehow could lean your car out at some point in your rpm.
don't worry about the exhaust, our car don't depend on back pressure that much.
you could get a erratic a/f reading which somehow could lean your car out at some point in your rpm.
don't worry about the exhaust, our car don't depend on back pressure that much.