Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:43 PM
  #1  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
Turbulence

I am afraid that I may be on the path to creating a slight bottleneck in the exhaust system and giving way to boost/exhaust turbulence.

Heres the setup that is most likely going in:

- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)

As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?

Last edited by spoolingEVOx; Dec 30, 2004 at 09:46 PM.
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
mhutch's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: houston
Originally Posted by spoolingEVOx
I am afraid that I may be on the path to creating a slight bottleneck in the exhaust system and giving way to boost/exhaust turbulence.

Heres the setup that is most likely going in:

- 3" WORKS O2 Housing
- 3" WORKS Downpipe
- 3" Helix High Flow Cat
- 2.95" HKS Hi-Power Exhaust (which tapers as it approaches the cat)

As you can see, I am going from a 3" exhaust at the O2 sensor all they way into a tapered 2.95" cat-back. What do you guys think?

3% difference in area. no big deal.
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
okay good, i just wanted to be extremely careful in putting together an exhaust system.

what is your opinion on the quality of WORKS products?
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #4  
YellowFever's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
it wont make a BIG noticable difference, but it will make or show a difference of a low gain in a dyno graph on TQ or HP curves in higher RPM levels
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #5  
EVIL MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
it gets to 2 1/2'' not 2 95 where it meet the cat i have the same sh-t
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #6  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
oh, so this is actually a good thing?

thanks for the feedback joel.
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #7  
kimletrim's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
From: indi
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #8  
YellowFever's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
good thing - no - I rather have more top end than low-end - thats why I opt for 3" all the way. Even David Buschur from Buschur Racing recommends it
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #9  
YellowFever's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Originally Posted by kimletrim
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?

Piping is piping - one is not made out of gold or chocolate - both will gave almost the same HP - its just all in the tuning
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #10  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
Originally Posted by YellowFever
good thing - no - I rather have more top end than low-end - thats why I opt for 3" all the way. Even David Buschur from Buschur Racing recommends it

maybe not a good thing for you, but i love a little bit of torque down low to compensate for the high end power.
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #11  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
Originally Posted by kimletrim
Don't see too much problem as many aftermarket 3" systems neck down slightly at the cat. The bigger issue, if I may, is why not stick with WORKS when you already spent good money on two of their products? I love the WORKS DP and the HFC and I am not bashing HKS, but if you are spending that much for WORKS, why not make it a system?

i already have an hks hi-power that is going in after february. i love the sound these exhausts produce and the quality/craftsmanship behind them.

not sure about the WORKS HFC. i've seen the helix and i am very, very impressed. guess that remains to be determined.

the main reason i'm going with the WORKS downpipe is because its the only 3" on the market that doesnt interfere with the lower tie bars or the oil pan. (i think)
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #12  
plokivos's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 4
From: Atlanta
only turbulance you should be worrying about on a turbo car is the intake to intake manifold.

you could get a erratic a/f reading which somehow could lean your car out at some point in your rpm.

don't worry about the exhaust, our car don't depend on back pressure that much.




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:53 PM.