Cams dyno charts inside
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cams dyno charts inside
I was looking at AMS's site and came across a cam comparion on a older Eclipse. I know its not a EVO but its very close and the gains should be about the same. There are dynos of JUN, Web, Crower, HKS 264 & 272, and of course stock cams. Just go to the link and scroll down and you can see the dyno graphs. HKS makes some good cams from looking at these dynos!!!! Enjoy
http://www.automotosports.com/cam_test.asp
-Leonard
http://www.automotosports.com/cam_test.asp
-Leonard
Last edited by use2vtec; Jan 22, 2005 at 10:08 PM.
#3
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
![Wink](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#4
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by use2vtec
Sorry about that. Ive just read so many posts lately wondering about differnet cam comparisons. I figured this could be useful to some people on here. And it was just over 1.5 years ago pal
.
![Wink](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Decisions decisions..
#5
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MadMsheen
It was helpful to me. I have done searches on CAM threads numerous times before, and this is the first time I've seen this one. I am still deciding on the CAM configuration I want to go with. It would seem that the 264/264 or 264/272 might be the way to go. Why would anyone want to get the 272/272 if it yielded less torque, slower spool up, and less power off boost? Possibly that the 272/272 might have more potential after further modifications?
Decisions decisions..
Decisions decisions..
#6
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MadMsheen
It was helpful to me. I have done searches on CAM threads numerous times before, and this is the first time I've seen this one. I am still deciding on the CAM configuration I want to go with. It would seem that the 264/264 or 264/272 might be the way to go. Why would anyone want to get the 272/272 if it yielded less torque, slower spool up, and less power off boost? Possibly that the 272/272 might have more potential after further modifications?
Decisions decisions..
Decisions decisions..
-Leonard
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: La Isla Del Encanto
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by use2vtec
I feel that the 272s will make more power than the 264s past 7k. The 264s will fall off a lot sooner past redline than the 272s will. I would think that the 272s would be ideal for someone running a T3/T4 or bigger turbo than stock with upgraded valvetrain and the ability to rev to 7500 plus. If you plan on keeping stock turbo then stick with the 264s. Just my $.02
-Leonard
-Leonard
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AutoMotoSports
Automotosports - Illinois
77
Apr 20, 2007 06:37 AM
93esp
Private 'Evo 1 - 9' For Sale / Wanted
6
Dec 26, 2004 06:38 AM
RENN-ART
Evo Vendor 'Group Buy / Specials' Classifieds
2
Sep 30, 2003 09:41 PM