GSC Power Division Cams - Installed and turning!!
#32
Originally Posted by AdamsssEvo
Hey turboex,
Was you tuned at topspeed by Al awhile back? If so did you have a friend with some video
footage of me driving.
Was you tuned at topspeed by Al awhile back? If so did you have a friend with some video
footage of me driving.
#34
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
I KNOW this setup will make more power than my HKS 264's. It has a bit more pull above 6K. My 264's hit 340 on pump gas at 6500 RPMs and I am certain these will shift the power up a little towards 7k - 7.2K and give a little bump in HP and possibly even more torque due to the retention of the 264 exhaust cam
![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I currently have 264's & I am on the fence whether or not to go with the 272 int??
I am not sure the reward is worth the hassle for obtaining a 272 int cam......
Still have yet to see a dyno chart 264/264 vs 272I/264E compare anywhere......
#35
Originally Posted by WOT
Does your new cam set-up feel the same as the 264's below 6k?
I currently have 264's & I am on the fence whether or not to go with the 272 int??
I am not sure the reward is worth the hassle for obtaining a 272 int cam......
Still have yet to see a dyno chart 264/264 vs 272I/264E compare anywhere......
I currently have 264's & I am on the fence whether or not to go with the 272 int??
I am not sure the reward is worth the hassle for obtaining a 272 int cam......
Still have yet to see a dyno chart 264/264 vs 272I/264E compare anywhere......
#39
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tke_413
I think he put down mid 350's on pump gas...his car in an animal for what's done to it. I had the GSC 264/264's installed and gained 46.9WHP and 32.6TQ...these cams are awesome.
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
Originally Posted by nothere
tke 413,
I just got a set of gsc's 264s(not in yet), everything else being equal you got 46.9 hp out of the cams themselves?
I just got a set of gsc's 264s(not in yet), everything else being equal you got 46.9 hp out of the cams themselves?
#42
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by GregGSC
272/272 power-division cams with stock turbo and stock block. Stock ECU reflash
![](http://www.batlground.com/images/436evo.jpg)
![](http://www.batlground.com/images/436evo.jpg)
Why would you like Cams that can't make power above 6K? Am I the only one that sees this?
#43
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
The power is falling off like that because the turbo can't hold the boost in the higher rpms. The stock turbo will peak between 26-28psi in the midrange and then quickly fall off to 21-22psi in the higher rpm range. This is why the midrange is so strong. With a bigger turbo that will hold the boost you would see the power continue to climb.
Last edited by bpclements; Apr 2, 2005 at 07:15 PM.
#44
Yes from what I understand I put down mid 350s with these cams and that was with 3-4 gallons of 89 octane mixed in with a full tank of 93 (sorry Mark) for a safe tune. I guess that means there is more there. Hehe. So I am super happy with the GSC 72/64 setup. Amazing cams, amazing vendor. I will post the graph as soon as I get it. I was in San Antonio this weekend and joeycoates took my car up to the dyno shop. Thanks Joey!! And thanks Mark, too!!
GSC =![Thumbs Up](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smilie_thumbsup.gif)
GSC =
![Thumbs Up](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smilie_thumbsup.gif)
![](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/attachments/evo-sale-external-engine-power/61426-gsc-power-division-cam-release-cody-evo-dyno.jpg)
Last edited by EVOTEXAS; Apr 3, 2005 at 03:40 PM.