Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

522 Awhp, Stock Intake, Stock Exhaust Manifold, Stock Block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #31  
namahs's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
the pulls were done in 3rd and 4th, i am not sure what gear the 522 pull was in, if it was 3rd then the torque will be a little lower than 4th.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #32  
Tracy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Thank guys. Hope to make it to the track soon. I'll get you the E/T's ASAP

Last edited by Tracy; Mar 14, 2005 at 09:50 AM.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #33  
namahs's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by Event-Horizon
is this Ryno's car?
not anymore, it has a new owner.

Originally Posted by eve-slow
So, are you ably to run that kind of boost because of the fuel mix?
yes, more octane=more boost and more timing=more power.
this is what everyone else is doing as well. I can run 24 psi on pump gas but the timing is so retarded that the egt temperature is very high and it is not friendly on the valves and the turbo.

Originally Posted by rraulston
patent pending means you will see it in a year or two.......
not true, maybee 2 more weeks. we are patenting certain aspects of the adapter, not the idea.

Originally Posted by gunzo
Garrett GT turbine extension kit from BOZZ Speed .. circa 1997

the price is 420 000jpy (on the catalog) so probably you guys could make it cheaper ..

but if the japanese didn't patent it .. then they deserved to be shot ..
that price seems very high if i did my currency conversion correct. i am sure they pantented their kit, but it is less efficient than the adapter that is on the evo. they also use a non-stock downpipe, i think???
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:52 AM
  #34  
strongbear0's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
What was the highest duty cycle on the injectors? 680's seem a little small.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #35  
Tracy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by strongbear0
What was the highest duty cycle on the injectors? 680's seem a little small.
too high, the new injectors will be here this week along with a fuel pressure regulator and a larger rail.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #36  
strongbear0's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Yeah, I have a gt3076r going on next week and I am gonna be running 880's with an aeromotive fpr.

Originally Posted by Tracy
too high, the new injectors will be here this week along with a fuel pressure regulator and a larger rail.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #37  
Tracy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
awesome!!! Can't wait to see how it does. Good luck, man .
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #38  
GregGSC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
Sweet Numbers Batlground! keep up the good work!
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #39  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I can't help but wonder what a tubular manifold would do fo you. Probably more peak whp for sure. WOuld the spoolup increase as well? I love that turbo man and I know it makes BIG power, but it seems a little peaky to me.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #40  
KasEVO8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: California, USA
Is that the Greddy Type S ??? its doesnt even sound like a type s sounds way better..
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #41  
BSREVOLUTION's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
the spring is tightened all the way to hold that much boost. kei kei, i told you i need one of those gt35's.
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #42  
KasEVO8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: California, USA
Originally Posted by BSREVOLUTION
the spring is tightened all the way to hold that much boost. kei kei, i told you i need one of those gt35's.
Man im telling you lol.. Damn justin imma have to start listning to you more. lol

but i still want to see who uses a GT40 Non ballbearing. eehheehe
Old Mar 14, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #43  
KasEVO8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: California, USA
Originally Posted by namahs
thanks,
the car has a big frontmount, 3" exhaust, gsc 272 cams, ported exhaust manifold, gt35r adapter plate and kit, aem cdi with msd coils, aem ems, walbro 255 fuel pump, 680cc injectors. This was on no methanol and no nitrous, as i am sure that will come up in a few threads.
dan
Were can you find the gt35r adapter plate and kit?
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 06:14 AM
  #44  
wspy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Jamaica W.I.
Hey Tracy, How does the car drive i.e. in the low RPM area? It seems to me, judging from the graph, that it would be rather laggy! When do you get full boost? Looks like around 5000 to 5500 in that area
Mark
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #45  
namahs's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by wspy
Hey Tracy, How does the car drive i.e. in the low RPM area? It seems to me, judging from the graph, that it would be rather laggy! When do you get full boost? Looks like around 5000 to 5500 in that area
Mark
it makes 25 psi at 4800 rpm on the street as well as on the dyno. the boost contoller was set to not let the boost hit too hard on the dyno, we are trying out a prototype twin disk clutch that is very inexpensive. After i break it in i will launch it and really test it out. We have compared it to road race's dyno and ams's dyno and it is very close. the tubular manifold upgrade will spool it a little quicker.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:12 PM.