Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Atp turbo kit ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2005, 11:44 AM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Az3ar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted B
Actually, I was referring to hitting the turbine blades (not compressor blades) after passing through the engine, neither of which is especially desirable.

turbine blades are pretty tough a bit of rust wont matter at all.
Old May 9, 2005, 12:03 PM
  #32  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
That's a possiblity and may be good enough for some people, but I don't do things that way.
Old May 9, 2005, 08:46 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
statix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what do you guys feel a 3071 with the.82 housing can make on 100 octane with all the supporting mods on high boost..
Old May 9, 2005, 09:12 PM
  #34  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
wthoevo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, Ca.
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.82 housing=LAG. 340whp on DD dyno.
Originally Posted by statix
So what do you guys feel a 3071 with the.82 housing can make on 100 octane with all the supporting mods on high boost..
Old May 9, 2005, 10:54 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
statix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much laggier can it be over the .63 wouldnt it be worth it since the 3071 seems to not hold boost very well??
Old May 10, 2005, 06:10 AM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Az3ar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by statix
How much laggier can it be over the .63 wouldnt it be worth it since the 3071 seems to not hold boost very well??

who told you that 3071 dont hold boost very well? was is bla bla or you see facts like i do?
Old May 10, 2005, 06:12 AM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Az3ar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: none
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
82 hot side is not a good idea.. it will kill spool and maybe give you 15~20 whp up top (maybe)
Old May 10, 2005, 08:37 AM
  #38  
Evolving Member
 
EVOLUTIONIZE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What compressor wheel is in that 3071 of yours?
Old May 10, 2005, 11:07 AM
  #39  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Richard Sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted B
If your ATP kit has chromed mild steel IC pipes like mine did, be advised that the inside of these pipes are bare, and will rust (as apparent on the ones I'm holding). I don't want rust debris hitting the turbine blades.

If your kit has these pipes, I strongly suggest having them coated on the *inside* before installation.

Just FYI.

Cast iron rusts as well, IC pipes usually have a thin coating of oil after use.
Old May 10, 2005, 11:57 AM
  #40  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Perhaps, but the ones I have in my hand are used, there is no thin coating of oil, and there is rust. Again, this may be fine for some, but I don't do things that way.

Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
Old May 10, 2005, 01:13 PM
  #41  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Richard Sierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted B
Perhaps, but the ones I have in my hand are used, there is no thin coating of oil, and there is rust. Again, this may be fine for some, but I don't do things that way.

Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
Good suggestion, Do you recommend a particular catch can? What are your thoughts about ceramic coating the EM and o2 housing to eliminate the possiblity of rust entering the turbocharger?
Old May 10, 2005, 01:21 PM
  #42  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
There are several good catch cans available. The Weapon-R unit should be noted for it's seemingly tidy placement. The others require a little more squeezing for fitment.

Unlike the IC pipes, the EM gets quickly coated with carbon from the exhaust. The O2 housing falls downstream of the turbo, so it is a non-issue.
Old May 10, 2005, 08:32 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
statix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I just ordered the ATP 3071r with the .82 housing which I was told is good for about 25 more hp.
The extra lag shouldnt be a problem since Ill be installing this turbo onto a built 2.4 stroker with a stg 3 head.
And of course I have all the supporting mods, so I will let all of you know how it go's.
I am looking for 450whp on 100octane, I dont think that will be a problem....We'll see...
Old May 11, 2005, 03:29 AM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
trinydex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: not here
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
why run a 3071 on a built motor? why not run a gt35r or better yet.. a 3052/3076

Last edited by trinydex; May 11, 2005 at 06:54 AM.
Old May 11, 2005, 06:28 AM
  #45  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
I'd have to agree w/trinydex on that one. An increase in displacement of 20% is considerable, and you'd probably stand to fare better with a larger turbo at .63 A/R.


Quick Reply: Atp turbo kit ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.