Curiosity Question on those VTA and running fine
#31
not to add fuel to WarrTalons fire, but...
WarrTalon, If you look at RalliArtEVOVIII's sig he is also looking for a grounding kit, but ofcourse nothing from EBAY. This alone should inform you of what your matching wits with.
No Offense by the way
WarrTalon, If you look at RalliArtEVOVIII's sig he is also looking for a grounding kit, but ofcourse nothing from EBAY. This alone should inform you of what your matching wits with.
No Offense by the way
#32
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by RalliArtEvoVIII
how does a VTA bov harm your turbo? Only way it would is if it was surging, only "harm" i see from a VTA bov with the proper spring tension is that it'll make ur car run a bit more rich than it already is and maybe cause damage to 02 sensor from backfiring here and there.
As for Malibujack, i am in no way saying youre wrong, but from what i've seen and read, HKS SSQ+Evo=no good even running a standalone. I am aware of the design of the HKS SSQ where more boost=more solid closure of the BOV as its a pull type not push type bov. IMO: I think the Evo community is VERY uptight on loud bov issue. Of course there are other different car forums that will agree that choosing a BOV based on noise is stupid, but choosing a bov based on performance and having a nice sound included in the package isnt wrong. Some of the world's fastest cars are running loud bov's as well as infamous Japanese drivers overseas. People think its "so ridiculous" that people will sacrifice idle for noise..its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Its not like you're losing power (for the most part, some people tend to due to leaks and valve not remaining close), you're 1/4 time is gonna be pretty much the same regardless of VTA or Recirc. My point being: it is understandable taht some want to sacrifice idle somewhat(its not like you get idle drops 100% of the time, i'd say more like 15%) to hear a loud bov screaming from their car.
I'm just trying to see this from other people's views. and PS: I am recirculating
As for Malibujack, i am in no way saying youre wrong, but from what i've seen and read, HKS SSQ+Evo=no good even running a standalone. I am aware of the design of the HKS SSQ where more boost=more solid closure of the BOV as its a pull type not push type bov. IMO: I think the Evo community is VERY uptight on loud bov issue. Of course there are other different car forums that will agree that choosing a BOV based on noise is stupid, but choosing a bov based on performance and having a nice sound included in the package isnt wrong. Some of the world's fastest cars are running loud bov's as well as infamous Japanese drivers overseas. People think its "so ridiculous" that people will sacrifice idle for noise..its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Its not like you're losing power (for the most part, some people tend to due to leaks and valve not remaining close), you're 1/4 time is gonna be pretty much the same regardless of VTA or Recirc. My point being: it is understandable taht some want to sacrifice idle somewhat(its not like you get idle drops 100% of the time, i'd say more like 15%) to hear a loud bov screaming from their car.
I'm just trying to see this from other people's views. and PS: I am recirculating
My point wasn't the recirculation vs vta argument, I personally hate the sound.. My point was the drivers who VTA on a MAF Equipped car, and make the adjustment necessary to get the car to idle and not stall between shifts at lower loads, means you have a pretty significant spring pressure to hold it closed, that will result in surge in daily driving..
Now, I do run the HKS SSQV, and It does surge at very low loads, but it holds boost, I do run it recirculating, or vented, depending on my particular mood, however I have a blowthrough MAF sensor so I have no drivability issues whatsoever, it puts me in a position where I can test a different BOV any time I feel like it since it takes a few minutes to drop it in.. I've tested many different ones, the HKS is the only unit that didn't require any adjustment for it to idle well, and hold boost well, but it does result in some compressor surge if you don't get a perfect vacuum signal to it on lift..
In all, I just wanted to point out that most of the people who don't have idle issues with a VTA setup, are making sacrifices to use it in daily driving, and the adjustments required for it to work (or even running the SSQV) will result in surging because to prevent surge, the valve needs to be open whenever the engine is under vacuum and still generating positive pressure on the upper intercooler pipe. Otherwise it results in strange idle characteristics, RPM raising between shifts, moderate to severe compressor surge at part throttle low load driving.. etc.. the noise is a personal preference so I dont point that out (I hate it so I always complain about it on my car and the novelty got old real quick)
#33
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
And its not that your sacrificing idle for noise.. your sacrificing drivability for noise.. its not just your idle, its fuel consumption, drivability, and safety (a panic stop after loading the engine results in a stall in the middle of an intersection, etc..)
I do understand your point, and I do appreciate your playing devils advocate and asked this as a question, but it comes up often.
Ultimately people are going to do what they want, and people are a bit uptight about the noise because of the connotation it has, our cars aren't inexpensive cars cobbled together with inexpensive parts and driven by kids aspiring to be Vin Diesel, but that is the impression that very loud exhaust and BOV's gives and many of us try to avoid that image.. (Sadly enough, as the cars get more modified and NEED higher performance parts, you end up fitting that image anyway.. LOL)
I do understand your point, and I do appreciate your playing devils advocate and asked this as a question, but it comes up often.
Ultimately people are going to do what they want, and people are a bit uptight about the noise because of the connotation it has, our cars aren't inexpensive cars cobbled together with inexpensive parts and driven by kids aspiring to be Vin Diesel, but that is the impression that very loud exhaust and BOV's gives and many of us try to avoid that image.. (Sadly enough, as the cars get more modified and NEED higher performance parts, you end up fitting that image anyway.. LOL)
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have been runnig the HKS VTA in 2 Evo's now, my '03 i had issues untill i got Engine Managment, as for my MR it runs fine, i did not notice any compressor surge at all, car runs fine at idle, between gear shifts, and at high speeds.
#35
Originally Posted by DCSilvrEvo
Your not the only one. I made this one guy go across 2 lanes on the HIGHWAY with his handles toward the window. I was like OOOPPS!!!!
MY BAD.
Also I just paid the extra 100 bucks and got an HKS EIDS to smoothen the idle Still cant get the car to IDLE cold.
MY BAD.
Also I just paid the extra 100 bucks and got an HKS EIDS to smoothen the idle Still cant get the car to IDLE cold.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=103474
Scroll down to post 5 for the fix.
#36
I think flutter from not enough pressure to fully open the valve is often confused with the surge or stalling of the compressor wheel inside the housing. They sound completely different. I have heard plenty of turbo's surge and 9/10 times it under load not at partial throttle and not letting off the gas at highway speeds. Surge is a big time misconception on here and on other boards. Not every turbocharged vehicle needs a bov, or recirc valve.
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by humpevo311
I think flutter from not enough pressure to fully open the valve is often confused with the surge or stalling of the compressor wheel inside the housing. They sound completely different. I have heard plenty of turbo's surge and 9/10 times it under load not at partial throttle and not letting off the gas at highway speeds. Surge is a big time misconception on here and on other boards. Not every turbocharged vehicle needs a bov, or recirc valve.
Oh and interesting post on the cold start problem with EIDS units. I tried breaking every wire with a toggle switch EXCEPT the TPS wire lol. I guess I will do that and be done with it.
Last edited by fre; Jun 28, 2005 at 06:37 PM.
#39
Originally Posted by fre
Oh and interesting post on the cold start problem with EIDS units. I tried breaking every wire with a toggle switch EXCEPT the TPS wire lol. I guess I will do that and be done with it.
#40
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok listen, turbo charged cars were designed for the access pressure to go back into the system, not to blow off into atmosphere. VTA were only invented for the sound, thats it ans thats all. now i have have many expierence with bov's and diverter valves, and let me tell u that the sound is not worth the god damn headach that it gives u. if u are just a person who just like to cruze and impress people then chance the vta, but if u want a performer then upgrade ur stock plactic diverter valve with a nice one that u can change spring pressure (forge on is great) .and thats all i have to say about that.
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
Besides, VTA Scares old ladies and children..
Last edited by PoorBoys; Jun 30, 2005 at 06:38 AM.
#43
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by humpevo311
I think flutter from not enough pressure to fully open the valve is often confused with the surge or stalling of the compressor wheel inside the housing. They sound completely different. I have heard plenty of turbo's surge and 9/10 times it under load not at partial throttle and not letting off the gas at highway speeds. Surge is a big time misconception on here and on other boards. Not every turbocharged vehicle needs a bov, or recirc valve.
And its true that not every turbocharged car needs a BOV/DV I've seen plenty of older turbo cars without any, and supecharged cars, simply put, their running pretty low boost and have pretty loose clearances, it still has a "surge area" (additional volume in the pipes due to such low boost) that it was just not necessary. Also some purpose built cars that don't see any on/off throttle driving.
HOWEVER, not allowing the Evo to vent excess boost properly, leads to compressor surge.... PERIOD.. Whether its severe or not depends on a few things, but to sacrifice the potential longevity of the turbocharger and drivability for the sound, well, thats just rediculous.
#44
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
ok listen, turbo charged cars were designed for the access pressure to go back into the system, not to blow off into atmosphere. VTA were only invented for the sound, thats it ans thats all. now i have have many expierence with bov's and diverter valves, and let me tell u that the sound is not worth the god damn headach that it gives u. if u are just a person who just like to cruze and impress people then chance the vta, but if u want a performer then upgrade ur stock plactic diverter valve with a nice one that u can change spring pressure (forge on is great) .and thats all i have to say about that.
VTA was not only invented for the sound, Blowoff valves were invented to relieve excess pressure, on supercharged cars, they were called pop-off valves since they would pop open if the engine backfired or couldn't ingest all the air given to it. It just happens that many earlier cars didn't matter whether the excess pressure was vented back into the system or to the atmosphere. Just like people take valvecover breathers and don't plumb it back into the inake (In that case its a combination of lazyness and nowhere to put it)
What my point is, the Evo will never run optimally if you VTA without taking the necessary steps.. but forcing a valve that wants to be partially open under a vacuum to be closed, ISNT a solution, its a crutch...
There's obviously many of you who just can't grasp the concept that VTA Isn't better, and it doesn't solve any more problems then it creates. If you like the sound, Fine.. No biggie, but understand that for most people, thats all it gives you (among possible drivability headaches)
#45
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by PoorBoys
Was that your reasoning FOR VTAs? Gotta balance it out after the long rant against. Luckily those of us with VTAs have simple minds.
anyone interested in a blowthrough MAF should check out several of the threads I've posted over the past 2 years.. search under "blowthrough Maf" however keep in mind everything comes with a price, either monetary or compromise, so you have to weigh the value of what you want, against the expense to accomplish it. My needs were not in any way associated with a BOV, it was a secondary consideration.
Now with all of that said.. Yes, I do VTA, No I don't have a stock Maf, therefore no, I don't have ANY drivability issues related to it. However I will go on record saying that I absolutely HATE HATE HATE the sound, it annoys me and I'm embarrassed by it, but I also realized it was part of the cost of "doing business" and a compromise I needed to make in order to prevent spurious boost leaks.
Last edited by MalibuJack; Jun 30, 2005 at 07:35 AM.