Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

20G turbo upgrade from Buschur Racing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2006, 12:39 PM
  #676  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ct9a gsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
To give perspective, A stock '03 evo makes about 230whp on a dynojet 424x
230 + 140= 370whp

Dave,
That is what many many of us make all over the country. And tons of us go out and run 113 to 115 mph at the track with those kind of numbers. Now, with your top notch drivers and bit of extra weight removal, there is no way you should do better than 117mph.

Your numbers simply don't add up.
Just for reference, my Evo's rated at 389whp (19whp more than your 370whp #) and I run 118mph w/ absolutely no weight reduction + spare + tools in the trunk.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 12:44 PM
  #677  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ct9a gsr
Just for reference, my Evo's rated at 389whp (19whp more than your 370whp #) and I run 118mph w/ absolutely no weight reduction + spare + tools in the trunk.
Exactly what kind of dyno? If that was on a Dynojet on SAE correction, those numbers perfectly back up the point I am trying to make.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 01:42 PM
  #678  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
LIFER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cinci, Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
I have a hard time with the math on this achievement.

Stock on your dyno = 213
Stock MPH in 1/4 = about 104
328 whp = 115 whp over stock
Your MPH = 124

So, you are honestly claiming that you gained 20mph in the quarter with just 115 more horsepower.

even when adding 22% to compare to a dynojet you make 140whp over stock.

To give perspective, A stock '03 evo using STD correction, makes about 230whp on a dynojet 424x
230 + 140= 370whp

Dave,
That is what many many of us make all over the country. And tons of us go out and run 113 to 115 mph at the track with those kind of numbers. Now, with your top notch drivers and bit of extra weight removal, there is no way you should do better than 117mph.

Your numbers simply don't add up.

Finally, I know that you (and others) are going to feel the need to personally insult me. But please, please, answer my question when you are finished.
I will give you some very simple facts, so that I make this black and white for you.

On David's dyno I put down 275whp wich is only about 70whp more than stock 03 evo's put down on his dyno, and I ran 11.8@116

70whp = 12-13mph gain over stock

David put down 340whp the same dyno @ ran a 124 trap.. Thats 135whp more than the 03's put down stock on "HIS" dyno.

135whp=20-21mph gain over stock


How does that not make since?? You can say his dyno may read low. But you cant say 124mph traps are not possible with 340whp on his dyno.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 01:52 PM
  #679  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LIFER
David put down 340whp the same dyno @ ran a 124 trap.. Thats 135whp more than the 03's put down stock on "HIS" dyno.
How does that not make since?? You can say his dyno may read low. But you cant say 124mph traps are not possible with 340whp on his dyno.
For starters, where are you getting the 340whp figure from? I directly quoted David Buschur who states that he did 124mph on 328whp.

Lets just get on the same page.

Last edited by Smogrunner; Jan 7, 2006 at 01:57 PM.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 01:55 PM
  #680  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
LIFER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cinci, Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
For starters, where are you getting the 340whp figure from? I directly quoted who states that he did 124mph on 328whp.

Lets just get on the same page.

O so the extra 16whp I typed by mistake, means it never could happen?

Its still 120whp more than a stock 03 puts down on his dyno..

and I traped 14mph faster than a stock 03 with only 70whp more


whats the point of having a "truth squad" when they can't see the truth when it's in there face
Old Jan 7, 2006, 01:59 PM
  #681  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
DragNRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LIFER

whats the point of having a "truth squad" when they can't see the truth when it's in there face
+1
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:09 PM
  #682  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok,
Using David Buschurs own calculations of 22% variation between his dyno and the all wheel drive dynojet of Tym Switzer's:

275whp + 22% = 335.5whp.

OK, I think I might be on to something here. If you are doing 11.8 at 116 on 335whp the track you race at is not accurate -OR- you have removed around 400 to 500lbs from your car.

I can post up hordes of guys with average evos making 330 to 340 whp on dynojets who go out to the track and NEVER get passed 112mph.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:15 PM
  #683  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
mhgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Ok,
Using David Buschurs own calculations of 22% variation between his dyno and the all wheel drive dynojet of Tym Switzer's:

275whp + 22% = 335.5whp.

OK, I think I might be on to something here. If you are doing 11.8 at 116 on 335whp the track you race at is not accurate -OR- you have removed around 400 to 500lbs from your car.

I can post up hordes of guys with average evos making 330 to 340 whp on dynojets who go out to the track and NEVER get passed 112mph.

Your math is wrong. It should be 275/0.78 = 352.6 hp.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:15 PM
  #684  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
LIFER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cinci, Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Ok,
Using David Buschurs own calculations of 22% variation between his dyno and the all wheel drive dynojet of Tym Switzer's:

275whp + 22% = 335.5whp.

OK, I think I might be on to something here. If you are doing 11.8 at 116 on 335whp the track you race at is not accurate -OR- you have removed around 400 to 500lbs from your car.

I can post up hordes of guys with average evos making 330 to 340 whp on dynojets who go out to the track and NEVER get passed 112mph.

A normal mustang dyno reads 22% less than a dynojet... David's is more like 30% on avg.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:20 PM
  #685  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
mhgsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also. do we know for a fact that a +10 HP gain on a Dynojet is equal to a +10 HP gain on DB's dyno? It would seem to me that each HP should be correspondingly adjusted, and that it doesn't follow a 1:1 ratio after baseline.

Last edited by mhgsx; Jan 7, 2006 at 02:22 PM.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:27 PM
  #686  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mhgsx
Your math is wrong. It should be 275/0.78 = 352.6 hp.
I'm sorry, your math is wrong, as is your formula above.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:31 PM
  #687  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
LIFER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cinci, Ohio
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
I'm sorry, your math is wrong, as is your formula above.

What is it with you and alway's questioning everything that David say's.. You seem kinda bias for a title like "truth squad"
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:37 PM
  #688  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Boosted AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo IX 20G may just be the ticket, what injectors are needed and will a FMIC upgrade be needed?
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:48 PM
  #689  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Smogrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inland Empire, CA
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LIFER
A normal mustang dyno reads 22% less than a dynojet... David's is more like 30% on avg.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=175482

Please read for yourself. David B himself rated his dyno to read 22% lower than Tym's dynojet. Furthermore, DB called it the "End All Comparison," implying that the results were definitive. You, on the other hand, are truly pulling this 30% number from thin air.
Old Jan 7, 2006, 02:52 PM
  #690  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 96 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
I have a hard time with the math on this achievement.

Stock on your dyno = 213
Stock MPH in 1/4 = about 104
328 whp = 115 whp over stock
Your MPH = 124

So, you are honestly claiming that you gained 20mph in the quarter with just 115 more horsepower.
I think that the answer lies in the shape of the power curve and the weight reduction mods. The BR RS makes huge midrange compared to other Evos making similar peak numbers, and we've all seen enough dyno queen big turbo cars at the track to know that there's more to 1/4 performance than peak numbers.


Quick Reply: 20G turbo upgrade from Buschur Racing.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM.