20G turbo upgrade from Buschur Racing.
#826
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya he said him self some post befor dont remeber were. he said everything he has from up to stage 4, which does not inclue head work, or pistions and what not like that. so if his car has that its misleading, corret me if im wrong.
Last edited by DragNRacing; Apr 27, 2006 at 05:25 AM.
#828
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Originally Posted by DragNRacing
David does have head work, a built motor, and a lighter car. However I do not and am still getting nearly the same results from the 20G-9-5 with a 6spd that sucks for drag. I do have their full stage 4 with the Revolver cams. My entire mod list is in my signature under the "Buschur Signature Stage" link but a built head and motor are definitely not necessary.
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
#830
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I know that's the only thing keeping me from getting them. I'm just running HKS 264's right now. Not work 2-3k to upgrade cams right now
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. I haven't seen to many stock turbos trapping 120+ but that could be ignorance on my part. I'd like to trap 150mph on my 20G but lets be realistic here.
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
#831
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
#832
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
Yeah shave off some weight, standalone, built motor all around better setup and VPC16. I would expect it to do better.
You want big, go big.
#836
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have said this once already in the thread, u see the numbers that the 20g-9-5 is putting out. aparently u want some 500hp beast, sorry to break the news to u but the 20g isnt going to cut it. u will need at least a 35r. so do me a favor, stop the ranting about " o i have seen this and that " because i really dont think any of us here care.
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
#837
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think that 430whp Dyno-Jet would be possible with the 20G-9 on race gas with the required supporting mods, possible standalone, and good tuning. That would be right around 500hp at the crank. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 500 crank horsepower doesnt seem that out of reach with the 20G-9....
#838
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very true. but your not getting any more hp from th turbo at that point.
Originally Posted by RSGuy
I would think that 430whp Dyno-Jet would be possible with the 20G-9 on race gas with the required supporting mods, possible standalone, and good tuning. That would be right around 500hp at the crank. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 500 crank horsepower doesnt seem that out of reach with the 20G-9....