264/272 >>> 280/280
Oct 24, 2005, 02:17 PM
#17
Evolving Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go with the 280"s if your not concerned about the idle. Its not much worse then the 272"s but it is worse. You will deffially make more power then 272"s. I love them and am very happy i chose them over the 272"s. I also have the stock turbo.
Oct 24, 2005, 02:24 PM
#19
Evolving Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Myself and one of my friends did them. IF you need someone to do them pm me. I work for no limit and yes i got them here. We also have them in stock both 272/280. I am using stock gears.
Oct 24, 2005, 03:00 PM
#20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04 rs
the lift is exectly the same
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
I hope I'm just missing the sarcasm here ... otherwise - _you_must_be_joking_
l8r)
l8r)
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 264 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 272 10.8 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 272 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
That is directly off the HKS website.
Oct 24, 2005, 03:27 PM
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sleet
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 264 10.8 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 264 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 272 10.8 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 272 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
That is directly off the HKS website.
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 264 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 272 10.8 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 272 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Intake 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution 2003-2004 Exhaust 4G63BT 280 10.2 $335.00
That is directly off the HKS website.
l8r)
Last edited by Ludikraut; Oct 26, 2005 at 08:53 AM. Reason: HKSUSA must have a typo on their page
Oct 24, 2005, 04:34 PM
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many people have said that the 280s on stock valvetrain can rev to 8k saftley and some kids even said 8.5k. If I got them i'd probally only goto 8k tho if that.
Oct 24, 2005, 05:51 PM
#24
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am running the 280/280 set up on my car and I love it as well. There seems to be no noticeable low end loss and the power they make is increadible. The idle does stink but many hours of fiddling with the BISS and the idle tune has made it better. I still only get about 11 in/hg at idle. If you go too high with the idle RPM the car will idle hunt, too low and it stalls when you come to a light with the A.C. on. I have found that 1000 RPM idle works very will with a slight rich condition at idle. I run my 280's at 0/0, I found this to be the best settings for my set up.
Oct 24, 2005, 05:57 PM
#25
Originally Posted by 04 rs
Go with the 280"s if your not concerned about the idle. Its not much worse then the 272"s but it is worse. You will deffially make more power then 272"s. I love them and am very happy i chose them over the 272"s. I also have the stock turbo.
You have an 04 spec turbo right or did you upgrade to the 10.5 exh housing?
Oct 24, 2005, 06:00 PM
#26
Originally Posted by joeracer321
I am running the 280/280 set up on my car and I love it as well. There seems to be no noticeable low end loss and the power they make is increadible. The idle does stink but many hours of fiddling with the BISS and the idle tune has made it better. I still only get about 11 in/hg at idle. If you go too high with the idle RPM the car will idle hunt, too low and it stalls when you come to a light with the A.C. on. I have found that 1000 RPM idle works very will with a slight rich condition at idle. I run my 280's at 0/0, I found this to be the best settings for my set up.
I'm trying to piece together my X-Mas EVO parts shopping list together.... and I'm highly considering the 280's
Oct 24, 2005, 09:17 PM
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spragueevo8
if you go with the HKS 272 or the 280 cams, do you need to upgrade the valetrain, and when is a good time to put in stroger Head bolts??
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
Look at any dyno at the "midrange torque" numbers... YOu can sacrifice 7 horse power to pick up 17 ft/lbs of torque.
what is that one dyno chart supposed to prove? Where is the comparison run to show us the whp/torque difference?
l8r)
Oct 25, 2005, 07:06 AM
#30
HP 345 TQ298
aem short ram intake
greddy type s blow off valve (single spring mod done)
hks 280 cams
greddy profec b spec 2 electronic boost controller @ 21 psi
megan racing EXHAUST::::
3" O2 housing
3" downpipe
3"cat delete pipe
3"cat back without the silencer
WALBRO 225 FUEL PUMP
PERRIN 02 SIMULATOR