Buschur Racing's, 661 MD AWD HP.....just getting started
Jan 28, 2006, 01:11 PM
#47
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ron
Why such low power on a GT45R? The Ecotec boys are making 1200-1400 hp (flywheel) on the GT45R. Is your current state of tune just a low-boost shakedown session?
Last edited by 3000ways; Jan 28, 2006 at 01:25 PM.
Jan 28, 2006, 02:00 PM
#48
joeymia,
Didn't consider a destroked 2.4 liter. I've seen a few over the years and haven't been overly impressed with any of them.
Keep in mind the 3 fastest 4G63 powered cars of all time were powered by normal 2 liters.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Didn't consider a destroked 2.4 liter. I've seen a few over the years and haven't been overly impressed with any of them.
Keep in mind the 3 fastest 4G63 powered cars of all time were powered by normal 2 liters.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Jan 28, 2006, 02:01 PM
#49
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.....i guess i wasnt the only one crazy enough to think of ever running a GT45R on a 4G.....good luck w/ the car and keep up the good work, its only a matter of time (aka money) before i ship my car to buschur 
Jan 28, 2006, 04:43 PM
#50
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really don't think this car is making over 800whp. there has been about 70-80whp difference going from buschur's dyno to pruven's. he still has alot of tuning to do, so we will have to see.
Jan 28, 2006, 04:55 PM
#51
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san antonio
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^^^This car is probably closer to 900 on a dynojet, I believe you are wrong^^
Originally Posted by Jasil
Didn't Al's car dyno at 580awhp on Buschur MD and didn't his car make 761awhp on a dynojet? If so, Dave's car should already be putting out over 840awhp, we'll see.
Jan 28, 2006, 04:57 PM
#52
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that was al's 35r that made 580whp, and it made 660ish on a dynojet. the 760 was with a new i/c and nitrous on the 40r i think.
Last edited by nickracer9; Jan 28, 2006 at 05:01 PM.
Jan 29, 2006, 06:24 AM
#55
PhillyEVO, I built your lower i/c pipe on Saturday. The new engine/head/turbo are in. I'd guess around Tuesday or so the car will be ready to be tuned, just a guess as I don't run the service side of our shop. Looking good though and mostly buttoned up.
Yes, we sell that radiator. If you are running a car with a/c I wouldn't recommend it. Other than that is has proven to be plenty street worthy and seems to cool the cars we have put them on as good or better than a stock radiator.
I actually considered putting that radiator in my RS but since I want to keep the car in our "Stock Appearing Class" at our shootouts I can't.
The car will have to get taken to a Dynojet when it is final tuned, so will my RS. Then we can all stop guessing at what kind of power levels they are making on a Dynojet. I don't really care what it makes on a Dynojet, it might be decent bragging rights though.
The bottom line for us is the car isn't close yet and it is already 130+whp more than we ran our 10.12 at 141 mph on last year in the same car.
This car should come out a good 150 pounds lighter this year if we cut it down to just one lightweight seat for the driver. Last year it had a complete exhaust on it and full factory interior. We just pulled the seats out of it to install in a theft EVO my brother bought and is driving. He was actually sitting on a case of oil in the car when we dyno'd it
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Yes, we sell that radiator. If you are running a car with a/c I wouldn't recommend it. Other than that is has proven to be plenty street worthy and seems to cool the cars we have put them on as good or better than a stock radiator.
I actually considered putting that radiator in my RS but since I want to keep the car in our "Stock Appearing Class" at our shootouts I can't.
The car will have to get taken to a Dynojet when it is final tuned, so will my RS. Then we can all stop guessing at what kind of power levels they are making on a Dynojet. I don't really care what it makes on a Dynojet, it might be decent bragging rights though.
The bottom line for us is the car isn't close yet and it is already 130+whp more than we ran our 10.12 at 141 mph on last year in the same car.
This car should come out a good 150 pounds lighter this year if we cut it down to just one lightweight seat for the driver. Last year it had a complete exhaust on it and full factory interior. We just pulled the seats out of it to install in a theft EVO my brother bought and is driving. He was actually sitting on a case of oil in the car when we dyno'd it
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Jan 29, 2006, 10:55 AM
#58
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3000ways
It's a very low reading mustang dyno, like somebody already stated right before your post, 660WHP on this Mustang is well over 800WHP on most dyno jets. Also this car (EVO) is a street/drag car. Sorry bud but your 1200 Flywheel HP Ecotec is no where near street driven-
Jan 29, 2006, 11:06 AM
#59
Originally Posted by kmcconn9
/\ this is the first I have heard of someone utilizing the HKS intake manifold....what are you impression of it dave?
