Quad turbo... Pics
Feb 7, 2006, 08:30 PM
#19
Evolved Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks awesome. But I wonder if that is entirely good for it. Any knowledgable chaps out there can shed light on this? There are things about the flow which I am a little curious. One being the pulsing and the other being what happens when one clyinder's exhaust valve is shut, the other open - would the pressure developed in the intake manifold actually slow down the other turbine (with no exhaust flowing thorough it)?
I'm no expert at this, so I could be totally wrong, but I'd love to have some expert opinions on this....
either way, it would be welcomed under my hood.
I'm no expert at this, so I could be totally wrong, but I'd love to have some expert opinions on this....
either way, it would be welcomed under my hood.
Feb 7, 2006, 08:51 PM
#21
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok people slow down now this by far is one crazy idea yes but knowing the cost of the kit plus the amount of tuneing time that would be needed to get the full power out this kit would not be worth the hassle. This is a waste of money why. Heres why because well better yet name one car that has a 4 turbo set that one puts out more power then a single turbo would. Another you wouldnt even want to know how much up keep you would need to do with this kit. Will this make production yes maybe would race teams buy it no. This would be more of a stand out piece then a proven piece. One last thing before you come up with a crazy idea and concept like this one you would think he would have posted numbers and dyno charts to show what this kit can do. do we see that he no. Thats why this is a concept i could only imagne the torque that this kit would out put.
Ok people lets go back some time ago you guys remeber that one sale post on this forum and ebay about the twin 16g turbo setup yea remeber sure you do everybody and there mother asked ?'s about the kit. The kit ran 11's of the bat then 10's. But like every concept it had it problems that the shop who made it didnt want nobody to know. Like blowing a exedy triple carbon clutch one off a few passes ummmmmmm. Yea thats why this would never be that great.
Good head guys say what you want to say. But the facts will kill your overexposed egos.
GOOD LUCK TO WHO EVER IS MAKEING THIS KIT I HOPE THEY SELL ALOT.
Ok people lets go back some time ago you guys remeber that one sale post on this forum and ebay about the twin 16g turbo setup yea remeber sure you do everybody and there mother asked ?'s about the kit. The kit ran 11's of the bat then 10's. But like every concept it had it problems that the shop who made it didnt want nobody to know. Like blowing a exedy triple carbon clutch one off a few passes ummmmmmm. Yea thats why this would never be that great.
Good head guys say what you want to say. But the facts will kill your overexposed egos.
GOOD LUCK TO WHO EVER IS MAKEING THIS KIT I HOPE THEY SELL ALOT.
Feb 7, 2006, 09:13 PM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas...panhandle...ugh
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spoolingEVOx
umm, subscribed..
Originally Posted by jmartinez1170
Im not going to say anymore about this topic. Or respond to any quotes
Originally Posted by Killboy
Good.
Originally Posted by reeLz
^^ Where the hell did that come from??
Yeah...I'm REALLY f*****n pissed about this.
Feb 7, 2006, 10:17 PM
#30
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD/PA line
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have seen a Supra w/ a turbo per 2 Cylinder, but no an evo 1:1. Looks cool.
The little turbo's should boost quickly. Low end tq like someone stated earlier.
Fitment issue to say the least probably.
The little turbo's should boost quickly. Low end tq like someone stated earlier.
Fitment issue to say the least probably.