2 900hp Evo's in the Buschur stable.....
#1
2 900hp Evo's in the Buschur stable.....
We recently finished up Big Al's car and it is going to be a beast. He is now running a full custom BR 3.5" turboback exhaust, custom upper IC piping and front mount, tubular style exhaust manifold, GT42R, and a bunch of go fast goodies.
We also recently switched our black Evo over to a 42R once we seen what the difference was with Al's car and the 45R that we were currently running. If you would like to check out the dyno sheet CLICK HERE
Nick
Buschur Racing Inc.
We also recently switched our black Evo over to a 42R once we seen what the difference was with Al's car and the 45R that we were currently running. If you would like to check out the dyno sheet CLICK HERE
Nick
Buschur Racing Inc.
#5
Originally Posted by 3000ways
So in your opinion is the 42R better than the larger 45R? Is the 45R just too big?
If you watch the Swytzer dyno vid you can see how long the throttle body is open before boost hits
#7
Originally Posted by Nez136
That would be my guess seeing that the black Evo is a 2.0,
If you watch the Swytzer dyno vid you can see how long the throttle body is open before boost hits
If you watch the Swytzer dyno vid you can see how long the throttle body is open before boost hits
makes you wonder what's holding the AMS car back.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by 3000ways
So in your opinion is the 42R better than the larger 45R? Is the 45R just too big?
#10
How does that car feel on the road?
I'm planning on getting a stroker kit / turbo upgrade down the road.
Looking at the dyno sheets -
@ 4600rpm you have ~ 200 ft lbs tqr.
@ 5300rpm you start to ramp up quickly.
@ 7400rpm you achieve max trq
Which drops off to about 450 ft lbs trq till redline.
To be honest with you this is my first turbocharged car - I don't notice much lag because of my relative stock setup - I'd assume you just keep the revs up at the track etc...
I'm planning on going with a 2.3l kit with the GT40R turbo. I like its effeciency range and decent/great spool up characteristcs...
I'm planning on getting a stroker kit / turbo upgrade down the road.
Looking at the dyno sheets -
@ 4600rpm you have ~ 200 ft lbs tqr.
@ 5300rpm you start to ramp up quickly.
@ 7400rpm you achieve max trq
Which drops off to about 450 ft lbs trq till redline.
To be honest with you this is my first turbocharged car - I don't notice much lag because of my relative stock setup - I'd assume you just keep the revs up at the track etc...
I'm planning on going with a 2.3l kit with the GT40R turbo. I like its effeciency range and decent/great spool up characteristcs...
#12
Originally Posted by kapolani
I'm planning on going with a 2.3l kit with the GT40R turbo. I like its effeciency range and decent/great spool up characteristcs...
#14
Originally Posted by kapolani
How does that car feel on the road?
I'm planning on getting a stroker kit / turbo upgrade down the road.
Looking at the dyno sheets -
@ 4600rpm you have ~ 200 ft lbs tqr.
@ 5300rpm you start to ramp up quickly.
@ 7400rpm you achieve max trq
Which drops off to about 450 ft lbs trq till redline.
To be honest with you this is my first turbocharged car - I don't notice much lag because of my relative stock setup - I'd assume you just keep the revs up at the track etc...
I'm planning on going with a 2.3l kit with the GT40R turbo. I like its effeciency range and decent/great spool up characteristcs...
I'm planning on getting a stroker kit / turbo upgrade down the road.
Looking at the dyno sheets -
@ 4600rpm you have ~ 200 ft lbs tqr.
@ 5300rpm you start to ramp up quickly.
@ 7400rpm you achieve max trq
Which drops off to about 450 ft lbs trq till redline.
To be honest with you this is my first turbocharged car - I don't notice much lag because of my relative stock setup - I'd assume you just keep the revs up at the track etc...
I'm planning on going with a 2.3l kit with the GT40R turbo. I like its effeciency range and decent/great spool up characteristcs...
#15
Al, did gain, but just not enough 761whp with the 40R and trapspeeds went to the low 140's, but the E.T was no better.
Quick question regarding the sheets I'm hoping I'm just reading this wrong, but Al's car made 760whp, but spools up significantly later than the 2.0? What am I missing here?
Quick question regarding the sheets I'm hoping I'm just reading this wrong, but Al's car made 760whp, but spools up significantly later than the 2.0? What am I missing here?