Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

To GT35R or FP3065 ???? choices, decisions....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Originally Posted by MrEvo2U
If I remember correctly, Buschur's black evo went 10.12 with a 3065 before they yanked it out and went with the 42R or whatever they are using now. I'm currently putting my 3065 on my MR with a 2.4L. Should know in a week or so how much power it will make.


keep us posted
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 03:01 AM
  #17  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
Originally Posted by MrEvo2U
If I remember correctly, Buschur's black evo went 10.12 with a 3065 before they yanked it out and went with the 42R or whatever they are using now. I'm currently putting my 3065 on my MR with a 2.4L. Should know in a week or so how much power it will make.
Nope, you remember wrong, that was with a off of the shelf 35R kit.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #18  
MrEvo2U's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
FYI, Buschur's 'off the shelf' 35R kit IS the fp3065 with Buschur's cast manifold. I have one sitting here next to me. It is a pretty sweet kit with everything polished or high temp ceramic coated. It is also a cast manifold which retains the stock heat shield - VERY helpful for us CA guys where the police are fond of pulling cars over and demanding to inspect the engine for modifications. Buschur's kit also includes the fan, Tial 44mm and a bunch of other stuff.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 08:35 AM
  #19  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Intersting. I think Buschur could cut costs even further by using a smaller wastegate. The 38mm or 40mm would do and is much cheaper than the 44m. Maybe he uses it because its V-band though...
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #20  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 4
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by 4TUN8
If you're not going to run alky or race gas I wouldn't bother with the 35r. As for the 3065, I don't know enough about it....ok I don't even know what it is.

All I know is on pump gas the 35r is a dog.

Put c16 and 30+ psi and well....the 35r will pound everything else into the ground.
i dont agree with the comment of it being a dog.

we run ours on pump 94 at 25 psi, and its pretty hellacious.

Ill have dyno numbers soon....

but it slips the stage 3+ spec clutch (that we are taking out)....

and spins all four tires on a roll on in second.

cb
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #21  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by CBRD
i dont agree with the comment of it being a dog.

we run ours on pump 94 at 25 psi, and its pretty hellacious.

Ill have dyno numbers soon....

but it slips the stage 3+ spec clutch (that we are taking out)....

and spins all four tires on a roll on in second.

cb
I still agree with him. Yes the 35R can make good power on pump it is quite laggy and the powerband wont be nearly as good as a quicker spooling turbo with a little less topend... like a 50trim... I think thats a much better choice if youre just running pump gas.

I will be going 50trim or 3065 with alcohol.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #22  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
I will be going 50trim or 3065 with alcohol.
Consider a 3076r also. Nice turbo. So far with a conservative tune on pump, I made 397whp on 23psi. I have a .82 back housing although I dont have a AEM ecu to log spool up , I think it on about 4500rpm. I am getting my Meth kit in a couple of weeks. Oh Yeah I am running a Flash!
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #23  
h22gordo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 3
I'm also stuck between the 35r and the 3065. I'm leaning towards the 3065, as I am looking for a nice turbo for the road course, and this seems to be the kit!
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #24  
yellowEVO21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by WrX Kila
Consider a 3076r also. Nice turbo. So far with a conservative tune on pump, I made 397whp on 23psi. I have a .82 back housing although I dont have a AEM ecu to log spool up , I think it on about 4500rpm. I am getting my Meth kit in a couple of weeks. Oh Yeah I am running a Flash!
he's making 378 whp on the stock turbo on 93 octane only. he's gona drop all that money for turbo and supporting mods to go up 20whp on pump?

the 3065 will make more top-end than the 3076 but spool a lil bit faster than the 35r....considering how a lot of tuners are saying take the 35r because the lag is almost as bad with less topend on the 3076 , the 3065 seems like a good compromise.

Last edited by yellowEVO21; Apr 3, 2006 at 10:20 AM.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #25  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
FP3065 is what I have on my Eclipse on a completely stock 7-bolt motor minus minus MLS gasket/ARP studs/FP2 cams...spool on a 11.1:1 a/f with stock timing map that peaks at 16degrees (pump 93octane w/680cc of meth @20psi) I got 25psi at 4200rpms.

The FP3065 is a Garett CHRA center section with a GT40 intake wheel and GT30 exhaust wheel mated to a Mitsu manifold, (no need for an aftermarket exhaust manifold -nice when money's an issue and a ported 2G manifold flows pretty damn well), and utilizes a .63 a/r hot side.

The "GT35R" is very similar except it uses a GT40 intake wheel and a GT35 exhaust wheel with a .83/1.01 a/r on the hot side.

The GT35R with a T4 exhaust side, (the only GT35R I'd recommend as the T3 exhaust side is worthless as it restricts flow at high boost/rpm), definately lags a lot more than the "smaller" counterpart -FP3065. Although it lags a bit more, because of the larger flowing exhaust housing and a/r flows a lot more hp at high rpms.

So it depends if you want a hwy/track car vs. a more "streetable" setup. Both make great power, (though both rated at 60lbs./min = ~600fly hp, the 3065 seems to taper off at around 550whp as the straight Garett GT35r T4 seems to make closer to 600-630whp.

Hope that helps...and FYI neither turbo starts to make NOTICEABLE power till you push upwards of 22-25psi.

Last edited by inco9nito99; Apr 3, 2006 at 11:55 AM.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #26  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by WrX Kila
Consider a 3076r also. Nice turbo. So far with a conservative tune on pump, I made 397whp on 23psi. I have a .82 back housing although I dont have a AEM ecu to log spool up , I think it on about 4500rpm. I am getting my Meth kit in a couple of weeks. Oh Yeah I am running a Flash!
I actually wont be considering that 3076 because I really have not seen any impressive numbers. From what I gather, the 50 trim spools faster and the norm seems to be 415-450whp on pump alone, with 475-500whp on meth/93 or race gas.

I dont know your supporting mods so I wont make assumptions but I think I could make 397whp with my setup right now with just adding alcohol/meth.

Your numbers should go up sigfinicantly with the meth.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #27  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 58
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
The GT35R with a T4 exhaust side, (the only GT35R I'd recommend as the T3 exhaust side is worthless as it restricts flow at high boost/rpm) . . .
At some point the T3 housing does reach its limitations, but there are quite a few cars running around with the 'worthless' T3 housing running over 30psi efficiently and with upwards of 600whp.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #28  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Oh don't get me wrong, I would just prefer a T4 vs. a T3 exhaust housing if I wanted the most efficient hp for a track/hwy car.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #29  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Thanks for all the responses guys....

I just wanna say that I mainly drive the car on the street....

what I'm currently doing is 93 + methanol all the time. I'd like to have at least 420-430 TQ in the low-mid range and whatever power I can make safely on the stock bottom end up top.....

Even with my set-up I'm satisfied with the power i have for driving around town OFF boost...

but when it hits boost I want it to pull like crazy and beat everyone that I can on the highway...

It also would be nice to have a turbo that responds well for road racing .....but mainly I likie to have my fun on the highway.
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #30  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Yeah I'd have to agree on the T3 flanged gt35r being the wrong way to go. If anything, I would only get a t3 inlet gt35r, and if I wanted to go to a t4 inlet I would go to a bigger turbo....

Scorke


Quick Reply: To GT35R or FP3065 ???? choices, decisions....



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 AM.