RnR (Daily Driver) HITS THE DYNO!!!!
May 9, 2006, 02:52 PM
#46
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would give it out for free if the other companies were interested in doing it. I have no doubt it would be really close. Those kits you listed are all really good, but there are a few others I have issues with.
May 9, 2006, 02:54 PM
#47
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryan,
Can you please pm me a good deal on the 2.4. I do wanna do it soon!
Thanx!
PJ
Can you please pm me a good deal on the 2.4. I do wanna do it soon!
Thanx!PJ
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
PJ, I can't wait to see your car and the final numbers once you get it tuned. Let me know if you still need that 2.4
May 9, 2006, 03:00 PM
#48
Evolving Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RnR Racing
Hows this, I will put up our 35R kit to anyone who wants to test it against the rest. That is how sure I am about the results. We have already done this on our own with several kits.
Whoever you do this with make sure they post the results!!!
Ryan i think you just made a good challenge to other tuners.
Steve
GnV Motorsports
May 9, 2006, 03:07 PM
#49
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will say this. I am nothing but HAPPY with the kit that Ryan made for me.... fitment was perfect and i cant complain about 471whp without even being tuned yet... When i hit my numbers are you still going to rag on Ryans work?? cuz i personally think RnR makes some quality ****.
PJ
PJ
May 9, 2006, 03:11 PM
#50
Originally Posted by pjsevo8
I will say this. I am nothing but HAPPY with the kit that Ryan made for me.... fitment was perfect and i cant complain about 471whp without even being tuned yet... When i hit my numbers are you still going to rag on Ryans work?? cuz i personally think RnR makes some quality ****.
PJ
PJ
May 9, 2006, 03:58 PM
#51
Evolving Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pjsevo8
I will say this. I am nothing but HAPPY with the kit that Ryan made for me.... fitment was perfect and i cant complain about 471whp without even being tuned yet... When i hit my numbers are you still going to rag on Ryans work?? cuz i personally think RnR makes some quality ****.
PJ
PJ
Thats convincing i still have not decided which way to lean for my turbo kit when i get one. I gotta do some more research first though thats for sure. Which kit do you have btw? gt35r...?
Steve
GnV Motorsports
May 9, 2006, 06:17 PM
#52
Originally Posted by GNV Motorsports
PJ,
Thats convincing i still have not decided which way to lean for my turbo kit when i get one. I gotta do some more research first though thats for sure. Which kit do you have btw? gt35r...?
Steve
GnV Motorsports
Thats convincing i still have not decided which way to lean for my turbo kit when i get one. I gotta do some more research first though thats for sure. Which kit do you have btw? gt35r...?
Steve
GnV Motorsports
May 9, 2006, 08:13 PM
#55
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ted B
That's because your engine management does not alter the factory injector drivers.
The problem here is the RNR car is running an AEM EMS. The injectors EVERYONE is using is a low impedance injector. The AEM EMS comes equipped for a lower performance, high impedance injector (go figure). This creates a mismatch, which apparently slows the injector response time. The end result is decreased effective fuel flow. This is why virtually every AEM EMS user reports having to use abnormally large injectors, which constitutes a band-aid fix at best.
The correct fix is a $300 low impedance injector driver box offered by AEM. When the RNR car is fitted with this driver box, it should remedy the situation, and the 1000s should suffice . . .easily.
The problem here is the RNR car is running an AEM EMS. The injectors EVERYONE is using is a low impedance injector. The AEM EMS comes equipped for a lower performance, high impedance injector (go figure). This creates a mismatch, which apparently slows the injector response time. The end result is decreased effective fuel flow. This is why virtually every AEM EMS user reports having to use abnormally large injectors, which constitutes a band-aid fix at best.
The correct fix is a $300 low impedance injector driver box offered by AEM. When the RNR car is fitted with this driver box, it should remedy the situation, and the 1000s should suffice . . .easily.
Usually though, the AEM box isn't really required til 1600's. 1000's have been made to work on TONS of cars.
This car obviously had the same setup before, just with a different tune. The "quoted" (in the past) numbers were over 700whp on the AEM and the same setup.
I can't see Ryan quoting lower numbers (albeit at lower boost) for any reason other than this is the first time the car MADE the power it did.
May 9, 2006, 09:19 PM
#56
Evolving Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryan,
What is the difference between your design in manifolds compared to AMS's or a Greddy kit? I am really now considering some of your stuff and some more info would be great.
Steve
GnV Motorsports
What is the difference between your design in manifolds compared to AMS's or a Greddy kit? I am really now considering some of your stuff and some more info would be great.
Steve
GnV Motorsports
May 9, 2006, 10:11 PM
#57
Originally Posted by Ted B
That's because your engine management does not alter the factory injector drivers.
The problem here is the RNR car is running an AEM EMS. The injectors EVERYONE is using is a low impedance injector. The AEM EMS comes equipped for a lower performance, high impedance injector (go figure). This creates a mismatch, which apparently slows the injector response time. The end result is decreased effective fuel flow. This is why virtually every AEM EMS user reports having to use abnormally large injectors, which constitutes a band-aid fix at best.
The correct fix is a $300 low impedance injector driver box offered by AEM. When the RNR car is fitted with this driver box, it should remedy the situation, and the 1000s should suffice . . .easily.
The problem here is the RNR car is running an AEM EMS. The injectors EVERYONE is using is a low impedance injector. The AEM EMS comes equipped for a lower performance, high impedance injector (go figure). This creates a mismatch, which apparently slows the injector response time. The end result is decreased effective fuel flow. This is why virtually every AEM EMS user reports having to use abnormally large injectors, which constitutes a band-aid fix at best.
The correct fix is a $300 low impedance injector driver box offered by AEM. When the RNR car is fitted with this driver box, it should remedy the situation, and the 1000s should suffice . . .easily.
May 9, 2006, 10:15 PM
#58
Originally Posted by scorke
Define put up, I would love to see your kit, ams's, buschurs, full race's, shearers, and peak boosts on the same car same dyno, unfortunately that will never happen....
Scorke
Scorke
not like fullrace would win by like umpteen billion hp... it's just when it comes to slicing cheese this thin it helps to have the cfd to minmize error based testing.
May 10, 2006, 09:20 AM
#60
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just have to say thanks to Alfred from TT. I beleive he is going to be able to get 750whp out of a T3/T4 turbo. In the past we have always had to go to a full T4 to get over that 700whp mark. I use to have a 4067 and also a 4088R which both put me over 700whp at around 35-38psi.