Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Which turbo for 700awhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #61  
EVOllie's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, Maryland
Originally Posted by Rez90
here's a question. and i'm not trying to hate on anyone or anything......so please.........dont' jump down my throat.

but why 700whp................what are you going to be doing with this car?
Even if he dosent have a purpose on the built..does anyone agree this would be just plain fun?

A 6-700hp supra is fun on the street, i would imagine 700 awhp would be even more fun.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #62  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Can't cry about 700's
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #63  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
IMO the best way to make 700whp is with a GT4088R. I wanted 700whp without giving up any spool to a 35R. In my research I found that a GT4088R with a divided/twin scroll manifold will spool the same if not quicker than a 35R with a .82 a/r housing. All while making more power.

With a twin scroll/divided mani, you need to use a larger a/r housing for the turbo however.

With a 2.3L/40R the best is 1.06 a/r.

With a 2.0L/40R the best is .95 a/r.

Otherwise, if you dont mind giving up some spool, and want to save some money, just do the T67-Ptrim/"37R" with any single scroll mani you choose.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #64  
thekuai's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: staten island, ny
Originally Posted by Frenchy4g63
IMO the best way to make 700whp is with a GT4088R. I wanted 700whp without giving up any spool to a 35R. In my research I found that a GT4088R with a divided/twin scroll manifold will spool the same if not quicker than a 35R with a .82 a/r housing. All while making more power.

With a twin scroll/divided mani, you need to use a larger a/r housing for the turbo however.

With a 2.3L/40R the best is 1.06 a/r.

With a 2.0L/40R the best is .95 a/r.

Otherwise, if you dont mind giving up some spool, and want to save some money, just do the T67-Ptrim/"37R" with any single scroll mani you choose.

you said to get a twinscroll manifold but do you get a hotside with twinscroll as well?
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #65  
kjewer1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: MA
Originally Posted by EVOllie
T67 is a good turbo. definitly will reach the hp goal with the right combo. Its more streetable than u think, but everyone has there own opinion on "streetable" i guess.

Agreed. I qualified my statement a couple posts down from the one you quoted. I daily drove it for a good while. You just have to accept what you get for spool when you run a turbo that large for racing purposes. Seeing how people tend to cry about lag on this particular forum, I tailored my response for the intended audience. It's worth noting however that there are now cam options available that are providing significant decreases in boost threshold that just weren't available 3 years ago... Makes running big turbos a little more liveable. Using one of these cam options on my 2.3/T67 would have made a world of difference for daily driving.

After having run turbos like T25, 14b, small 16g, big 16g, EVO3 16g, 6H 20g, 6H 50 trim, 6H 35R, 60-1, T67, Etc, and now EVO8 16g and EVO Green, with varying displacement, I have a good idea of what I would like in a street-strip car. The EVO Green on the street, and with nitrous on the track, is the best compromise I have found yet. I might be getting old, but I could probably only tolerate up to a 35R these days... But now I've completely digressed from the original topic, my fault.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #66  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by thekuai
you said to get a twinscroll manifold but do you get a hotside with twinscroll as well?
Well yeah, otherwise it will defeat the purpose of a twin scroll setup. The 40R has a twin scroll T4 housing.
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 01:03 AM
  #67  
Rcebowl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by Frenchy4g63
Well yeah, otherwise it will defeat the purpose of a twin scroll setup. The 40R has a twin scroll T4 housing.
IMO there's no way a T4 gt4088r even with a twin scroll will spool as if not faster than a T3 gt3583r ..... are you sure your reading was including the fact that the gt35r would be a T3 NOT a T4 ... bc all the supra and cobra guys use a T4 gt35r....

HorsePowerFreaks has a T4 gt35r'd where they believe the bigger T4 exhaust housing will make more topend without losing too much spool... (on a side note... has of right now no one really knows ... bc their car needs a fuel system) However just by upgrading to a T4 exhuast housing they lost what i believe 400-500rpm ... u think a T4 gt4088r is gonnna be ANY better... i think not...

::shruggss:: just my opinion
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 01:14 AM
  #68  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Rcebowl
IMO there's no way a T4 gt4088r even with a twin scroll will spool as if not faster than a T3 gt3583r ..... are you sure your reading was including the fact that the gt35r would be a T3 NOT a T4 ... bc all the supra and cobra guys use a T4 gt35r....

HorsePowerFreaks has a T4 gt35r'd where they believe the bigger T4 exhaust housing will make more topend without losing too much spool... (on a side note... has of right now no one really knows ... bc their car needs a fuel system) However just by upgrading to a T4 exhuast housing they lost what i believe 400-500rpm ... u think a T4 gt4088r is gonnna be ANY better... i think not...

::shruggss:: just my opinion
Were they using a divided manifold? (since they switched from a T3 to a T4, I'm guessing no)

Do you have any pics of it? n/m, I found pics, single scroll mani.. so that's not at all what I'm talking about. You need a twin scroll mani AND twin scroll T4 housing.

Every time someone mentions the 40r, saying how slow it spools, was using a single scroll mani.

A twin scroll mani with a gt4088r with T4 twin scroll housing will spool about the same, if not a little faster than a single scroll mani with a gt35r (.82a/r) with a T3 single scroll housing.

I was skeptical too, but I found otherwise. The only reason I looked into it was because it was recommended by the owner/head of one of the most respected shops in the world..

Last edited by Frenchy4g63; Feb 18, 2007 at 01:21 AM.
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #69  
Rcebowl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
well i stand corrected i thought horsepowerfreaks' turbo kit was divided ...

however with the t4 twin scroll housing being faster... hopefully your right i'd love to see your results! keep up updated if you do it
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #70  
arpad's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by kjewer1
It's worth noting however that there are now cam options available that are providing significant decreases in boost threshold that just weren't available 3 years ago... Makes running big turbos a little more liveable. Using one of these cam options on my 2.3/T67 would have made a world of difference for daily driving.
What cams are you specifically referring to?

Originally Posted by Frenchy4g63
A twin scroll mani with a gt4088r with T4 twin scroll housing will spool about the same, if not a little faster than a single scroll mani with a gt35r (.82a/r) with a T3 single scroll housing.
Who makes gt4088r kits with a T4 twin scroll mani?
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #71  
giangi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Shearer builds twin scroll T4 manifolds, also if it's not part of a kit, as it seems from their web site, i'm going to purchase one from them for trying the GT4088R turbo, on the basis of the previous T3 manifold of this brand i just own i can only say enthusiastic things of these units, and their T4 is a true twin scroll, with 2 waste gate housings....
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #72  
kjewer1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: MA
The most recent results that come to mind are from the BC 280s. They've been shown to dramatically reduce boost threshold on 2.3/t67 setups recently. They have also been shown to be a bit more restrictive than some other options at high rpm, but this isn't much of a concern with strokers that are only being reved to 7500-8k. Based on the specs of those cams it's possible that similar results could be achieved with cam gears, but that is something I just don't have enough personal experience with to say for sure.
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #73  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by kjewer1
The most recent results that come to mind are from the BC 280s. They've been shown to dramatically reduce boost threshold on 2.3/t67 setups recently. They have also been shown to be a bit more restrictive than some other options at high rpm, but this isn't much of a concern with strokers that are only being reved to 7500-8k. Based on the specs of those cams it's possible that similar results could be achieved with cam gears, but that is something I just don't have enough personal experience with to say for sure.
You read my mind im putting cam gears on my BC 280/280 tomorrow. and going to -4/-4
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #74  
arpad's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by giangi
Shearer builds twin scroll T4 manifolds, also if it's not part of a kit, as it seems from their web site, i'm going to purchase one from them for trying the GT4088R turbo, on the basis of the previous T3 manifold of this brand i just own i can only say enthusiastic things of these units, and their T4 is a true twin scroll, with 2 waste gate housings....
Good stuff... unfortunately it doesn't leave space for the stock A/C. Do you know of anybody that makes a true twin scroll T4 manifold that leaves the stock A/C intact?

I'd rather swap radiators than have to take out the A/C... it gets a tad hot in Arizona during the summer. Just a little.
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #75  
giangi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
I don't think it's practically possible to retain ac compressor with a T4 manifold and turbo, for me it's not a problem, as i swapped out my ac system also with a t3 manifold, because i don't drive my car on the road except some rare cases, but if you live in a so hot area it could be a great problem...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LordHighBinary
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
60
Jan 12, 2011 02:33 AM
///M3an Machine
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Oct 1, 2009 11:11 PM
DynoFlash
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
25
Jul 8, 2008 10:34 PM
tms777
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Dec 9, 2007 07:33 AM
3000ways
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
23
Mar 9, 2006 02:12 PM



Quick Reply: Which turbo for 700awhp?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM.