2.1L Spun Rod Bearing
#16
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
did the bearings actually spin inside the rods? I ask because I can still see the tangs on several.
Did you check clearance when assembled?
There is no wear at the parting line because the bearings are thinner there. If you measure a new bearing with a bearing micrometer (has a ball on one side for the ID of the bearing) you can verify this. This is correct and by design.
If the bearings did spin then you need to get new rods.
Did you check clearance when assembled?
There is no wear at the parting line because the bearings are thinner there. If you measure a new bearing with a bearing micrometer (has a ball on one side for the ID of the bearing) you can verify this. This is correct and by design.
If the bearings did spin then you need to get new rods.
#18
Did you get the eagle rods? or the manley, from slowboy for the build? i have spoke about this motor before under a different name , my brother has a slowboy 2.1 and has about 10k on it with no complications {yet}, but yeah i first hand have seen some of these 2.1 motors have problems? nobody really knows why... might be the rods, clearences, or multi malfuntion of poop, heck maybe the motor is just an abortion! but if anyone else has any of their 2cent to throw up here go for it....but i really think its probly the machine work and /specs of the rods/bearing clearences remeber were not building 6bolt no longer that u can just slap in good internals and they work. good luck
#20
Yeah I had the Manley rods... I did not plastigauge the bearings. I have decided to just scrap all the 2.1 parts. The only parts that are still fine are the pistons. If anyone is interested in the pistons let me know. I think they are just regular stroker pistons with a 87mm bore.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
#21
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by joeymia
Yeah I had the Manley rods... I did not plastigauge the bearings. I have decided to just scrap all the 2.1 parts. The only parts that are still fine are the pistons. If anyone is interested in the pistons let me know. I think they are just regular stroker pistons with a 87mm bore.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
#22
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joeymia
Yeah I had the Manley rods... I did not plastigauge the bearings. I have decided to just scrap all the 2.1 parts. The only parts that are still fine are the pistons. If anyone is interested in the pistons let me know. I think they are just regular stroker pistons with a 87mm bore.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
Since I have the 4g64 crank sitting in my closet in perfect shape I have decided to just finish up the motor as a 2.4. Just ordered some Eagle rods and Wiseco Pistons ( k548M87). Hopefully all the parts come in by this weekend.
Thanks
Mark
SBR
Last edited by SlowboyMR; Jun 19, 2006 at 01:42 PM.
#23
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude that sucks to hear man...I have had 2 motors go out just like that for me. I am now on my 2.3 build, so i feel your pain$$. Now I am crazy paranoid as every little noise i hear coming from the motor spooks me into thinking that something is wrong. I check the oil like every day if not every other day for any indication of metal. None of the shops could tell me why the bearings spun twice, and none of them gave me a break on labor, or would even entertain that it was a build issue. Hope everything works out.
Last edited by redninja; Jun 19, 2006 at 01:36 PM.
#24
Evolved Member
Originally Posted by evo8urpride
thats nice, so if it is a "parts" problem then you'll take care of this guy too right!!!!!???? what if its in the design of the custom rod?? if thats the problem what is SBR's answer for everyone they sold a 2.1 too??
Last edited by GPTourer; Jun 19, 2006 at 01:46 PM.
#25
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8urpride
thats nice, so if it is a "parts" problem then you'll take care of this guy too right!!!!!???? what if its in the design of the custom rod?? if thats the problem what is SBR's answer for everyone they sold a 2.1 too??
Mark
SBR
Last edited by SlowboyMR; Jun 19, 2006 at 01:52 PM.
#26
Who makes the bearings used in this motor configuration?Are they Clevite,or Mitsu or
Fedral Mogul or Cosworth?Just trying to see how reliable the Cosworth bearings are if anyone is using them,ect...
I realize that bearings that are not properly clearanced will look just like Joey's as will ones that were installed DRY,just don't see any signs of them spinning as like stated eariler,
the tabs are still there and would not be,even if they just began to spin,they would be gone.
Fedral Mogul or Cosworth?Just trying to see how reliable the Cosworth bearings are if anyone is using them,ect...
I realize that bearings that are not properly clearanced will look just like Joey's as will ones that were installed DRY,just don't see any signs of them spinning as like stated eariler,
the tabs are still there and would not be,even if they just began to spin,they would be gone.
#27
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GPTourer
How do you come to that conclusion? IF SBR didn't themselves build the engine and the builder acknowledges that he didn't do a recommended process during the build, why would necessarily SBR be at fault? The kit is comprised of aftermarket parts from other companies...if all liability lies elsehwere, shouldn't he be going after the manufacturer and not SBR?
Mark
SBR
#28
yeah, i caught all that and, no Mark I'm not trying to hide, I'm right were you know to find me. {GPTourer dude read what i wrote very slow and the re-read, i said if it a parts oriented"design" failure, like if it has something to do with the rod design, because if it is , then it doesn't matter who machine's it or puts it togather it would fail...... And SBR claims to had Designed the ROD so if Manley built the rod to SBR's exact spec Wouldn't the problem be SBR's..... I see it that way, but like i also said, And mark you know also my brothers motor is 100% fine... no problems, but his motor also doesn't make the power that CB'd did either.. when it does which isn't to faraway, we will know then because SBR fully asembled it also....... and if his spins a rod bearing mark what will be your stand point? but once again,
pats motor has 10,000miles on it and its fine, if was gona throw a bearing it already would of, i believe SBR does build good motors that the 2.1 is a good design from SBR.....
pats motor has 10,000miles on it and its fine, if was gona throw a bearing it already would of, i believe SBR does build good motors that the 2.1 is a good design from SBR.....
Last edited by evo8urpride; Jun 19, 2006 at 02:34 PM. Reason: sp
#29
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8urpride
yeah, i caught all that and, no Mark I'm not trying to hide, I'm right were you know to find me. {GPTourer dude read what i wrote very slow and the re-read, i said if it a parts oriented"design" failure, like if it has something to do with the rod design, because if it is , then it doesn't matter who machine's it or puts it togather it would fail...... And SBR claims to had Designed the ROD so if Manley built the rod to SBR's exact spec Wouldn't the problem be SBR's..... I see it that way, but like i also said, And mark you know also my brothers motor is 100% fine... no problems, but his motor also doesn't make the power that CB'd did either.. when it does which isn't to faraway, we will know then because SBR fully asembled it also....... and if his spins a rod bearing mark what will be your stand point?
I know where Pat will be standing..."in front of your shop"
I know where Pat will be standing..."in front of your shop"
Mark
SBR
#30
I 1000% percent agree, but i'm just saying if there happens to be a flaw in the rod design, will you take care of it? you guys are good dudes and build good motors, but i do believe if there was a flaw Pats motor would already of blown. there is very little track time on his care how ever , he only ever made 5 passes at one track {prp} never been anywhere else or any other track,