My new IX MPFab Front Mount - PICS
#17
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Cost???
We had to make some minor mods to my Turbohoses.Com kit to make it work. This kit used difference hoses than stock so the piping was placed much closer to the core.
Last edited by 240Z TwinTurbo; Sep 12, 2006 at 06:08 AM.
#18
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Nice!
Anderson? I go to Clemson, but I am currently in Asheville co-oping. Check out our website (www.clemsonscc.com , maybe you have heard of us, maybe you haven't). We host our own autocrosses, although we are currently searching for a new lot, and we attend all NASA-SE track events, along with some others.
Devin
Anderson? I go to Clemson, but I am currently in Asheville co-oping. Check out our website (www.clemsonscc.com , maybe you have heard of us, maybe you haven't). We host our own autocrosses, although we are currently searching for a new lot, and we attend all NASA-SE track events, along with some others.
Devin
#19
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by SophieSleeps
what gains do you expect from this?
Starion core - 14psi max before detonation (~22deg)
Large Bell core (27x8x3- top-bottom flow) - 19psi max (~20deg)
Monster Core (20x6x5.5 - top-bottom flow) - 18psi max (26 deg)
Last core I had (24x12x3.5 - top-bottom flow) 18psi max (22 deg)
I always advocate a large and efficient core even if it is rated for more than you plan to use. I also saw no decrease in spool.
Large Bell core
Monster Core(5.5" thick)
Last core I had(disregard the nitrous backfire)
#20
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by SophieSleeps
what gains do you expect from this?
Here is in car video of the 9.4second pass.
9.4@142 Pass
#23
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by SophieSleeps
Forgive my newbie-ness
But how inefficient is the stock IC?
But how inefficient is the stock IC?
Originally Posted by SophieSleeps
And instead of buying a thicker/larger IC, why not spray meth or alcohol or something?
So to answer your question, I think Meth and stock intercooler will get much better results than an intercooler upgrade. This is due to lower intake temps and the ability to run much higher boost levels.
#24
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by WhiteEvo05
Slightly off topic...How do you like the Turbohoses.com pipes? How's the fit/finish? Clearance around the airbox? Would you use them again?
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Butthole, MA
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
For higher boost applications the OEM core will have a higher pressure drop which can take you out of the efficiency range of the compressor wheel. On my buddies GN powered 240Z using an NPR core he saw 8+psi pressure drop at 24psi of boost which meant his turbo was kicking out 32psi to make 24psi at the manifold. NOT GOOD
8PSI is a ton.
And your friend's 240. Was he measuring boost out of the compressor housing and post IC somewhere? I haven't seen too many people do that and compare.
#26
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by SophieSleeps
Did you mean the other (aftermarket) IC will cause a pressure drop?
8PSI is a ton.
And your friend's 240. Was he measuring boost out of the compressor housing and post IC somewhere? I haven't seen too many people do that and compare.
8PSI is a ton.
And your friend's 240. Was he measuring boost out of the compressor housing and post IC somewhere? I haven't seen too many people do that and compare.
BTW, I dug up my buddies old post regarding the NPR core, which is larger than the OEM EVO core.
"An example of this is when I hit the limit on the Big NPR. I ran into a brick wall at about 400rwhp. The car was performing "OK" but had some strange problems, like not being able to run more than 20psi and more detonation than I liked. turns out at 20psi at the intake, the turbo was pushing 30psi and 325* charge!!"
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Butthole, MA
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
The Garrett core is rated at 900hp(~1350cfm) with 1psi pressure drop. This will provide less of a restriction as opposed to the stock OEM core. I would be curious to see if anyone has measured this on the stock core at stock boost levels. I can take a measurement on my setup this weekend by tapping into the wastegate line.
BTW, I dug up my buddies old post regarding the NPR core, which is larger than the OEM EVO core.
"An example of this is when I hit the limit on the Big NPR. I ran into a brick wall at about 400rwhp. The car was performing "OK" but had some strange problems, like not being able to run more than 20psi and more detonation than I liked. turns out at 20psi at the intake, the turbo was pushing 30psi and 325* charge!!"
BTW, I dug up my buddies old post regarding the NPR core, which is larger than the OEM EVO core.
"An example of this is when I hit the limit on the Big NPR. I ran into a brick wall at about 400rwhp. The car was performing "OK" but had some strange problems, like not being able to run more than 20psi and more detonation than I liked. turns out at 20psi at the intake, the turbo was pushing 30psi and 325* charge!!"
Sure there wasn't something else wrong too? maybe a small boost leak or something. That's rough.