ATP 3076R Dyno Results = 485whp, 411wtq
#91
Every ATP kit that any of us have tuned at Dyno4mance was appreciably lower (like 25whp pump and 50whp race) than an identical turbo with the Garrett hotside. Of course these are all Evo VIIIs, but after seeing compelling evidence time and again that the ATPs are lower in power output, I regard this as a really strong car or that the porting really helped. Probably both.
#92
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
It could be the combination of the porting and the header. I also found that the wastegate bolts - from ATP (mounts) and from Tial were loose (all of them).
I love to see someone port their ATP housing and retune.
I love to see someone port their ATP housing and retune.
#93
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
I love to see someone port their ATP housing and retune.
I wish I had a Wednesday car like you!
Actually, I just wish I had an IX.
#94
Originally Posted by Noize
Every ATP kit that any of us have tuned at Dyno4mance was appreciably lower (like 25whp pump and 50whp race) than an identical turbo with the Garrett hotside. Of course these are all Evo VIIIs, but after seeing compelling evidence time and again that the ATPs are lower in power output, I regard this as a really strong car or that the porting really helped. Probably both.
ehhh come on Seth, so now its a strong car??? 100WHP stronger car??
The truth is that Joe did the following to help this turbo
1- Ported the turbo hot side (which is very simple job)
2- Installed the headers and took his time perfecting everything
3- Had a good tuner who was not biased against other manufacture parts.
That’s all to it. We don’t have a Ginny car nor do we have miracles.
Also, his tuner ran his car on the dyno atleast 26 runs. not 3 or 4 runs max
Last edited by Az3ar; Sep 22, 2006 at 01:56 PM.
#95
Originally Posted by Az3ar
ehhh come on Seth, so now its a strong car??? 100WHP stronger car??
The truth is that Joe did the following to help this turbo
1- Ported the turbo hot side (which is very simple job)
2- Installed the headers and took his time perfecting everything
3- Had a good tuner who was not biased against other manufacture parts.
That’s all to it. We don’t have a Ginny car nor do we have miracles.
Also, his tuner ran his car on the dyno atleast 26 runs. not 3 or 4 runs max
The truth is that Joe did the following to help this turbo
1- Ported the turbo hot side (which is very simple job)
2- Installed the headers and took his time perfecting everything
3- Had a good tuner who was not biased against other manufacture parts.
That’s all to it. We don’t have a Ginny car nor do we have miracles.
Also, his tuner ran his car on the dyno atleast 26 runs. not 3 or 4 runs max
I'm not denying that SmokinJoe made those numbers, nor that the porting and the header helped. But he might have a strong car too!
Also, don't bother comparing DD numbers to Dynojet numbers. Surely you know better.
Last edited by Zeus; Sep 22, 2006 at 10:45 PM.
#99
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Come on guys. Let's not turn this into a stupid pissing contest. Most of us know the "history" hear, so let's keep focused on the ATP kit and not get side tracked.
I think what is important to gain from this thread is that common wisdom is probably wrong on the ATP kits. They are capable of making good power and a viable option for someone that needs a stock appearing upgrade.
I think another important thing Joe touched on is maximizing all the different pieces to the puzzle to make the most of what you have. It is obvious there is a great deal to be gained (performance wise, not necessarily peak whp wise) playing with the cams. Throw in the port job and his header selection and look at the results.
As one who has never been a big fan of the ATP kit, I must admit that I am very impressed. Thanks to Joe for all the work.
I think what is important to gain from this thread is that common wisdom is probably wrong on the ATP kits. They are capable of making good power and a viable option for someone that needs a stock appearing upgrade.
I think another important thing Joe touched on is maximizing all the different pieces to the puzzle to make the most of what you have. It is obvious there is a great deal to be gained (performance wise, not necessarily peak whp wise) playing with the cams. Throw in the port job and his header selection and look at the results.
As one who has never been a big fan of the ATP kit, I must admit that I am very impressed. Thanks to Joe for all the work.
#100
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Come on guys. Let's not turn this into a stupid pissing contest. .
Nice job getting back on point. Thank you!
Is anyone with an ATP kit willing to port their housing and share the results in a before/after format? This will go a long way in proving if the housing is restrictive - And possibly ATP would consider a change to the casting if we show they are solid performance gains to be had.
I know for fact they are following this thread.
I'd be happy to explain to that person how I did the porting - total cost, rotozip and all - $115. And its really very easy.
#101
I am having my install shop port my ATP exhaust side housing as we speak. I have a 2.3 and racehead along with the HKS 272/280 cams. I will post my results when I get the car back from the shop.
#103
Count me in. I have the ATP 3037 .82 A/R and a Megan header. Finally fixed a wastegate problem and will hopefully have the car re-tuned in the next few weeks (either myself or a pro tuner, depending on $$). I'd be happy to get it tuned on the dyno, port the hotside, then return to the dyno. PM me on the porting please.
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Nice job getting back on point. Thank you!
Is anyone with an ATP kit willing to port their housing and share the results in a before/after format? This will go a long way in proving if the housing is restrictive - And possibly ATP would consider a change to the casting if we show they are solid performance gains to be had.
I know for fact they are following this thread.
I'd be happy to explain to that person how I did the porting - total cost, rotozip and all - $115. And its really very easy.
Is anyone with an ATP kit willing to port their housing and share the results in a before/after format? This will go a long way in proving if the housing is restrictive - And possibly ATP would consider a change to the casting if we show they are solid performance gains to be had.
I know for fact they are following this thread.
I'd be happy to explain to that person how I did the porting - total cost, rotozip and all - $115. And its really very easy.
#104
Originally Posted by PVD04
I agree that this turbo kit provides fairly good bang for the buck, however when compared to a Buschur turbo kit the bang for the buck factor isn't quite as impressive. This kit retails at $2400, the Buschur kit now retails at $2995. If you factor in an extra $200 for the manifold that puts you at @ $2600 for the ATP. This only applies if going with a GT 30 series turbo, because with the GT35 the cost of the ATP kit goes up to $2750. Adding a manifold to that makes the ATP kit only $50 cheaper than the Buschur kit. With the prices as close as they are I would have a hard time choosing the ATP kit over Buschur.
-Paul
-Paul
#105
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Think about it. What does the Mivec do? What impact does it have? And how could the hp/tq numbers stay the same when its off - but something else so drastic happens.
Hint - look at Scorke's 2.0 to my 2.0 graph
Hint - look at Scorke's 2.0 to my 2.0 graph