Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

ATP 3076R Dyno Results = 485whp, 411wtq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #91  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 135
From: Franklin, TN
Every ATP kit that any of us have tuned at Dyno4mance was appreciably lower (like 25whp pump and 50whp race) than an identical turbo with the Garrett hotside. Of course these are all Evo VIIIs, but after seeing compelling evidence time and again that the ATPs are lower in power output, I regard this as a really strong car or that the porting really helped. Probably both.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #92  
SmokinJoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
It could be the combination of the porting and the header. I also found that the wastegate bolts - from ATP (mounts) and from Tial were loose (all of them).

I love to see someone port their ATP housing and retune.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #93  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 135
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe

I love to see someone port their ATP housing and retune.
Me too, definitely! I think it could be a simple install alternative to other kits out there that makes just as much (or more in your case) power.

I wish I had a Wednesday car like you!

Actually, I just wish I had an IX.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #94  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
Originally Posted by Noize
Every ATP kit that any of us have tuned at Dyno4mance was appreciably lower (like 25whp pump and 50whp race) than an identical turbo with the Garrett hotside. Of course these are all Evo VIIIs, but after seeing compelling evidence time and again that the ATPs are lower in power output, I regard this as a really strong car or that the porting really helped. Probably both.

ehhh come on Seth, so now its a strong car??? 100WHP stronger car??

The truth is that Joe did the following to help this turbo

1- Ported the turbo hot side (which is very simple job)
2- Installed the headers and took his time perfecting everything
3- Had a good tuner who was not biased against other manufacture parts.

That’s all to it. We don’t have a Ginny car nor do we have miracles.

Also, his tuner ran his car on the dyno atleast 26 runs. not 3 or 4 runs max

Last edited by Az3ar; Sep 22, 2006 at 01:56 PM.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #95  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 135
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by Az3ar
ehhh come on Seth, so now its a strong car??? 100WHP stronger car??

The truth is that Joe did the following to help this turbo

1- Ported the turbo hot side (which is very simple job)
2- Installed the headers and took his time perfecting everything
3- Had a good tuner who was not biased against other manufacture parts.

That’s all to it. We don’t have a Ginny car nor do we have miracles.

Also, his tuner ran his car on the dyno atleast 26 runs. not 3 or 4 runs max
Andrew and I have both tuned a few ATP cars. We've also tuned AMS kits, Fullrace kits, etc, and the ATP kits were always lower. Sorry man, that's just the case we've seen too.

I'm not denying that SmokinJoe made those numbers, nor that the porting and the header helped. But he might have a strong car too!

Also, don't bother comparing DD numbers to Dynojet numbers. Surely you know better.

Last edited by Zeus; Sep 22, 2006 at 10:45 PM.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #96  
Az3ar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 1
From: none
...

Last edited by Zeus; Sep 22, 2006 at 10:44 PM.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #97  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
I'll be looking you up next year for some of those Track Events you're connected to

Last edited by Zeus; Sep 22, 2006 at 10:43 PM.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 08:05 PM
  #98  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 135
From: Franklin, TN


Will do, Zeus!

Last edited by Noize; Sep 23, 2006 at 04:10 AM.
Old Sep 22, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #99  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Come on guys. Let's not turn this into a stupid pissing contest. Most of us know the "history" hear, so let's keep focused on the ATP kit and not get side tracked.

I think what is important to gain from this thread is that common wisdom is probably wrong on the ATP kits. They are capable of making good power and a viable option for someone that needs a stock appearing upgrade.

I think another important thing Joe touched on is maximizing all the different pieces to the puzzle to make the most of what you have. It is obvious there is a great deal to be gained (performance wise, not necessarily peak whp wise) playing with the cams. Throw in the port job and his header selection and look at the results.

As one who has never been a big fan of the ATP kit, I must admit that I am very impressed. Thanks to Joe for all the work.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 05:20 AM
  #100  
SmokinJoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Come on guys. Let's not turn this into a stupid pissing contest. .

Nice job getting back on point. Thank you!


Is anyone with an ATP kit willing to port their housing and share the results in a before/after format? This will go a long way in proving if the housing is restrictive - And possibly ATP would consider a change to the casting if we show they are solid performance gains to be had.

I know for fact they are following this thread.

I'd be happy to explain to that person how I did the porting - total cost, rotozip and all - $115. And its really very easy.
Old Sep 23, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #101  
8URVTEC's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Las Cruces, NM
I am having my install shop port my ATP exhaust side housing as we speak. I have a 2.3 and racehead along with the HKS 272/280 cams. I will post my results when I get the car back from the shop.
Old Sep 25, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #102  
SmokinJoe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Alpharetta, GA
Great! I cant wait to see the before/after results
Old Sep 25, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #103  
Kyle R's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Count me in. I have the ATP 3037 .82 A/R and a Megan header. Finally fixed a wastegate problem and will hopefully have the car re-tuned in the next few weeks (either myself or a pro tuner, depending on $$). I'd be happy to get it tuned on the dyno, port the hotside, then return to the dyno. PM me on the porting please.



Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Nice job getting back on point. Thank you!


Is anyone with an ATP kit willing to port their housing and share the results in a before/after format? This will go a long way in proving if the housing is restrictive - And possibly ATP would consider a change to the casting if we show they are solid performance gains to be had.

I know for fact they are following this thread.

I'd be happy to explain to that person how I did the porting - total cost, rotozip and all - $115. And its really very easy.
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #104  
Spec'd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by PVD04
I agree that this turbo kit provides fairly good bang for the buck, however when compared to a Buschur turbo kit the bang for the buck factor isn't quite as impressive. This kit retails at $2400, the Buschur kit now retails at $2995. If you factor in an extra $200 for the manifold that puts you at @ $2600 for the ATP. This only applies if going with a GT 30 series turbo, because with the GT35 the cost of the ATP kit goes up to $2750. Adding a manifold to that makes the ATP kit only $50 cheaper than the Buschur kit. With the prices as close as they are I would have a hard time choosing the ATP kit over Buschur.

-Paul
The Buschur requires you to use thier intercooler.
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 01:34 AM
  #105  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 7
From: not here
Originally Posted by SmokinJoe
Think about it. What does the Mivec do? What impact does it have? And how could the hp/tq numbers stay the same when its off - but something else so drastic happens.

Hint - look at Scorke's 2.0 to my 2.0 graph
the intake cam is larger


Quick Reply: ATP 3076R Dyno Results = 485whp, 411wtq



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:12 PM.