Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AMS 2.3L + RnR GT30R results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2006, 09:47 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
fr34k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beverly Hills CA
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMS 2.3L + RnR GT30R results

22psi on 91oct and 26psi on 110 oct
had to stop there since I need to move on to bigger stuff like bigger throttle body due to the 2.3 (tuner said this)
and here is the dynosheet.
it was tuned by Alfred from Tuning Technologies using ECUFlash..
let me know what do you guys think..
car spools just like stock turbo, or even better


Last edited by fr34k; Sep 25, 2006 at 11:28 PM.
Old Sep 25, 2006, 09:52 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
TeKiZeRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, nice numbers! Must be a blast to drive .
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:10 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
Ackerson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a nice useable powerband. Do you have cams?
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:48 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Throttlebody and intake manifold and such are not restricting you yet, you still have a lot of power left on the plate at those levels. What hotside are you running and what manifold of RNR's are you using?
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:49 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
LpBevoEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why did you put that turbo kit on a good motor? I guess you didn't want to make power...

Nice graph btw
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:55 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
fr34k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beverly Hills CA
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 264/272 HKS cams..
I want it to be a quick daily driver with the least lag possible..
I could have gone with the 35R but that would be too laggy for my everyday use.
I have the equal length manifold..
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:55 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
fr34k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beverly Hills CA
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scorke
Throttlebody and intake manifold and such are not restricting you yet, you still have a lot of power left on the plate at those levels. What hotside are you running and what manifold of RNR's are you using?
I see that you have the same setup as I do, how much boost are you running max? how much power did you make?
Old Sep 25, 2006, 10:56 PM
  #8  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
SLOWRREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St.Marys,Georgia
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds like a not so bad kit to me..Dont know why people say things like that about certain kits,but not others..Great numbers..Justin..
Old Sep 25, 2006, 11:03 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At 20 psi on 93 i made 386 360 at 30 psi tapering to 26 I made 490 480, similar conditions on a dynojet.

Scorke
Old Sep 25, 2006, 11:12 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
fr34k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beverly Hills CA
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scorke
At 20 psi on 93 i made 386 360 at 30 psi tapering to 26 I made 490 480, similar conditions on a dynojet.

Scorke
great numbers!! wow.. really nice torque #s
30psi on C16 I assume?
what ems are you using?
Old Sep 25, 2006, 11:25 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ecutek, yes on C16, however at 25 PSI on C16 I made 475 475, so your not missing out on too much from the lack of octane, maybe another 20 whp at most.

Btw hate to be a pessimist again, I like to brag about my spool numbers but neither of us are close to a stock turbo
Below is an example of a maxed out stock turbo on TopSpeeds dyno.



Scorke
Old Sep 26, 2006, 07:56 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Creamo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LpBevoEvo
Why did you put that turbo kit on a good motor? I guess you didn't want to make power...

Nice graph btw
What's wrong w/ that turbokit; I personally have one and it fits great. Do you have any experience w/ them or are you talking out of your ace?

With that said the numbers seem to be a little lower than the norm, what is your complete modlist?

Last edited by Creamo3; Sep 26, 2006 at 07:59 AM.
Old Sep 26, 2006, 08:00 AM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ He is talking about every result that a RNR kit has put down on these boards vs the like of say a TTRIX, Full Race, AMS, or Buschur kit. You don't have to have any personal experience with something to know that it has the reputation of putting out low or abnormal numbers.

What sort of power did your RNR BB 50 Trim put down? I've seen a couple out of TT and AMS's stable that put out 500+ on race gas and low-mid 400's on pump, did your RNR kit perform like that?

Scorke
Old Sep 26, 2006, 08:03 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Creamo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scorke
^ He is talking about every result that a RNR kit has put down on these boards vs the like of say a TTRIX, Full Race, AMS, or Buschur kit. You don't have to have any personal experience with something to know that it has the reputation of putting out low or abnormal numbers.

What sort of power did your RNR BB 50 Trim put down? I've seen a couple out of TT and AMS's stable that put out 500+ on race gas and low-mid 400's on pump, did your RNR kit perform like that?

Scorke
I'll let you know once I'm tuned, I have also seen members put out over 500whp w/ RNR turbokits so what's your point. It usually comes down to the setup, combination of parts, and condition of the motor.
Old Sep 26, 2006, 08:08 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Show me a RNR 3076 or 50 trim that made 500whp, thats my point.

Yes a lot comes down to the setup, but when lots of cars share one particular component (turbokit) and produce lower than normal numbers, I find that odd or interesting.

Scorke


Quick Reply: AMS 2.3L + RnR GT30R results



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 AM.