Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Piston design quench zone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2006, 01:48 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Piston design quench zone

I brought some 2.2 liter pistons from Norris Designs. Nobody in the states has any pistons made for the 94mm stroke. Actually the pistons were advertised in classifiesds on lancer register. I was disappointed when they came in today because they are used. No mension the pistons were used in the ad so I assumed they were new. Anyway look to be of good design. Bath tub shape dish. I quickly started to take some measurements to be sure they were for 94mm stroke. The pins should sit 3mm lower than a stock aftermarket piston. They only sit 2.4mm lower. This means that the piston is going to sit .6mm(.025) above the deck. With stock gasket at .050 piston to head clearance is only .025. I have always wondered how close is too close. I read an article were a supercharged engine was run on both stock .065 deck height. Then switched to .033 deck height. They were able to run 2psi added boost with the tigher quench area.

I brought this subjuct up before. The stock evo8 pistons dont really have a quench zone. The stock deck height is .170. Aftermarket pistons are always flush with the block deck. This gives gasket thickness as the deck height or about .050. I personally ran .040 on the last engine I built. I am a little weary of useing these pistons as is. .025 just seems alittle close to me. The burn pattern on the pistons looks real good. Simon should know what he is doing, so maybe he found maximizing the quench zone is a good thing? I also dont know for sure if these were run with stock gasket. They may have been run with a thicker gasket.

It may be a simple equation the tighter the quench zone the better the detonation resistance. I wish I knew for sure.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Oct 27, 2006 at 02:10 AM.
Old Oct 27, 2006, 06:34 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
kjewer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It was found to be quite important on the DSMs, and Magnus' custom pistons have a large quench pad on them.

About the quench height, .025 does seem way to small for a high reving turbo motor. Last time I looked into this, most experience DSM engine builders were comfortable with 040, one guy ran 035. I would like to run it as tight as physically possible, but the chance that a mishsift could leave me with a lot more than just a loose flywheel makes me think twice about it for a daily driver. 040 seems to be the norm for poeple that pay any attention to it at all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GravityKnight
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
21
Mar 2, 2019 01:30 AM
Abacus
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
11
Nov 14, 2016 03:35 PM
4ukc
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Oct 29, 2015 06:54 AM
gallas
For Sale - Wanting To Buy (WTB) Or Trade (WTT)
5
Jun 9, 2013 07:27 PM
NewEvolutionIX
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
May 16, 2012 09:17 AM



Quick Reply: Piston design quench zone



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM.