anti lag in japan
#16
Did a bit more research. That pic up above I believe is Mitsu's WRC car. Mitsu in Europe supposedly advertised is as a "performance product" in that when the throttle body is closed, extra air from the intake would flow into the hot exhaust manifold. This is why people on and off boost notice a popping sound (without flames) comeing from their exhaust. Not enough fuel though to cause combustion to occur in the exhaust manifold so no ALS. Now if you could control a 5th fuel injector, that's another way to get it working.
Last edited by silex; Nov 20, 2006 at 12:36 AM.
#18
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
Bingo, the newbie nailed it. These are not anti lag devices, they for emissions (it re-burns some of the exhaust gas, i.e. EGR). They are totally not needed. They introduce hot exhaust gases into your intake manifold, raising the intake temperature and it also gets the runners in the intake manifold + head all covered in black soot, which hurts flow and power.
#19
Originally Posted by joeymia
lol those ports are not for EGR
#22
Originally Posted by dean evo9
is that a rally mitu car photo ?? i see they have cowel induction thats sweet , you could reall learn a lot from that photo
#23
Thats a TON of work for something that will probably only give you a 1/2 second of spool up, and only if you were already WOT. So basically the only thing this might be good for is a road course track car.
#24
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 1
From: Dirrrty Jerzey
road course car
that is the intent on this mod
but apparently
im getting nowhere
with this
that is the intent on this mod
but apparently
im getting nowhere
with this
Originally Posted by 20psiMR
Thats a TON of work for something that will probably only give you a 1/2 second of spool up, and only if you were already WOT. So basically the only thing this might be good for is a road course track car.
#25
Originally Posted by vboy425
inorder for it to work, you will need the JDM ecu
#28
When you say "true" do you mean hardware of software way of doing it? Both will give you similar results. Software way of doing it is to retard ignition timing by 30 degrees across the map when engine load is below 100.
#29
Pic of my EVO IV when I went to check it out last spring. HKS antilag manifold.
550hp RX6R Power Enterprise CT9A that retained the OEM antilag setup. TAS '06
If I got to TAS '07 I will try to get a lot of EVO pics.
550hp RX6R Power Enterprise CT9A that retained the OEM antilag setup. TAS '06
If I got to TAS '07 I will try to get a lot of EVO pics.
#30
Originally Posted by silex
When you say "true" do you mean hardware of software way of doing it? Both will give you similar results. Software way of doing it is to retard ignition timing by 30 degrees across the map when engine load is below 100.