Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Case Study # 151 - IX Evo with Intake and MBC makes great power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:06 PM
  #1  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
DynoFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Case Study # 151 - IX Evo with Intake and MBC makes great power

This car ran really well

2006 IX MR

Injen Intake

Forge Unos MBC

Walbro Fuel pump

100% stock exhuast

Custom Dyno Flash tune

21 psi peak 93 octane pump gas

Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:11 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
thisxguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
intake huh. do you have an estimate on a MBC (@21psi) on a stock ix does? i wonder how much that intake added.
Old Dec 3, 2006, 11:14 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
joshesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Soquel, CA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much do all those mods add up costing?
Old Dec 4, 2006, 12:33 AM
  #4  
Newbie
iTrader: (12)
 
Wicked MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joshesh
how much do all those mods add up costing?
www.lancershop.com for the parts and the flash is something like 200 or so.
Old Dec 4, 2006, 02:08 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
spyderx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore/ DC
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
stock exhaust, completely?

Wow, I may just put the stock cat back on!!!
Old Dec 4, 2006, 04:31 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
meanmud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 1st State
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
even if it had a TB and Test Pipe, that would be one of the Strongest IX's dynoed
324whp/348lb.ft. = 430bhp/462tq??
Old Dec 4, 2006, 05:13 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
At 21psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi. Add this to the other 9 qualities and those results aren't surprising at all, still impressive though.

Whats that equivalent to on Mustang?

Glad I didn't waste any money on a catback, definatly have to gut out the muffler check valve however

Last edited by C6C6CH3vo; Dec 4, 2006 at 05:16 AM.
Old Dec 4, 2006, 05:27 AM
  #8  
PPI
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (103)
 
PPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Macomb Twp. MI
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lol, worthless without baseline numbers. Those numbers seem to be more inflated than Dynojet....
Old Dec 4, 2006, 05:29 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
At 21psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi.
Definitely not true.
Old Dec 4, 2006, 05:40 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
SlowCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by manOfaith
lol, worthless without baseline numbers. Those numbers seem to be more inflated than Dynojet....
325/350@21psi.......

this guy made 360/400@25psi
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=234800

will be nice to see a before/after dyno plot
Old Dec 4, 2006, 09:32 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Kee1pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston,tx
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dynoflash forums = locked?
Old Dec 4, 2006, 07:33 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
At 21psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi.
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Definitely not true.
OK:

At 22psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi.

Well if it's not true than what is ?
Old Dec 4, 2006, 07:48 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
nikkadanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
dang nice numbers!
Old Dec 4, 2006, 09:12 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
At 21psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi.
OK:

At 22psi, those IX turbo's move the same air as a VIII turbo at 25psi.

Well if it's not true than what is ?
Thats wrong. They have a larger compressor housing which is helping it but its not moving any more air than a 2005 turbo. Its the same compressor wheel, same turbine wheel, same turbine housing (10.5). The IX's have more aggressive intake cams with higher lift, they have MIVEC, they have better designed heads to allow more timing. Many factors. Its not an EVO8 with a different turbo. I dont know where you people come up with these ideas.
Old Dec 5, 2006, 05:08 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sc
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
I dont know where you people come up with these ideas.
This aint an idea engineerboy: The compressor housing was increased in order to keep up with increasing demands and loads with the mivec sytem. The evo IX comsumes more air period, and would not be able to do so with the VIII compressor.

The turbo itself isn't the cause of the IX's power, niether is any other single changed IX component, it's the whole system alltogether


Quick Reply: Case Study # 151 - IX Evo with Intake and MBC makes great power



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 AM.