Mine and a buds FP20gLT dyno results.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:00 PM

#16

mikesevo8

Evolved Member

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 1,078

Likes: 61

From: Ulster County, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottatayamaha

Jeff Jeske - I would also like to know why he got 20 more hp than me...lol

I thought you said you were tuned for pump, and he was tuned for pump+meth...
Seems to me that would account for the 20hp difference.
What did I miss?

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:05 PM

#17

Jeff_Jeske

Evolved Member

iTrader: (66)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 4,358

Likes: 6

From: On the track

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottatayamaha

This time with the addition of the turbo and ported exhaust manifold and tune, still pump gas, not spraying the meth yet he put down 354AWHP at i think 24psi.

No spray

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:06 PM

#18

scottatyamaha

Thread Starter

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 2,210

Likes: 0

From: South Carolina

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesevo8

I thought you said you were tuned for pump, and he was tuned for pump+meth...
Seems to me that would account for the 20hp difference.
What did I miss?

Pump for pump he got 20 more hp than me. That was before he started spraying the meth.

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:33 PM

#19

mikiblueeyes

Evolving Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 487

Likes: 0

From: FAAAR FAAAR AWAAY :)

you said he ran 1 more psi of boost and have ex mani ported --there is about 20 HP plus cars are different.

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:48 PM

#20

hamflex

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 685

Likes: 0

From: Geneva, IL

crazy man

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 08:55 PM

#21

RenoEvo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (43)

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 1,005

Likes: 0

From: Reno, NV

354whp on their dyno is really strong for running 93 oct. only, thats about 400whp on a dynojet. Nice numbers!

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 11:12 PM

#22

MR. Birdie

Evolving Member

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 425

Likes: 0

From: So cali.

dang 400whp dynojet. NICE!

Reply Like

Dec 21, 2006 | 11:15 PM

#23

thatguy

Evolved Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 638

Likes: 0

From: milfburn

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoenixEvo

Lowest to highest ( mustang, dyno dynamics, dynojet)

But i must say i do think this is by far the best 20g ever!

unmolested dd and md should be extremely similiar in the numbers game

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 12:59 AM

#24

ONRAILS

Evolved Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 841

Likes: 0

From: Kentucky

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoenixEvo

Lowest to highest ( mustang, dyno dynamics, dynojet)

But i must say i do think this is by far the best 20g ever!

Just so everyone knows this is misinformation.

DynoDynamics at 1.00 Correction is the lowest reading dyno of the 3.

However with a dynodynamics you can run any correction you want so you can make the dyno read what you want.

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 04:54 AM

#25

Toddevo 8

Evolved Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 630

Likes: 0

From: atlanta

who cares which dyno you put it on it still made power. nice power curve. comes on real fast. doing what they did to the car I think that did it the way you should and tune it on a DD dyno, which I think is the best fo tuning. either way I can say I think they are happy with their cars.

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 05:25 AM

#26

Dyno4mance

Evolved Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 1,378

Likes: 0

From: NW Georgia

Quote:

Originally Posted by dxbevo8

Could the HKS cams be that much better than the GSC;
i hope not!!

good number though...
so does the satisfaction and gain you got from the LT justify its price?

No. But the VE of the second car was much better....Load was lower and sooner suggesting the combination of the different intake, different cams, ported hotside and uprated wastegate was able to flow more air through the engine..

FWIW this was the best turbo we have seen to date in this configuration, I for one am very impressed..It easily yields the same results up top on pump as a GT3076 but has the added benefit of stock like spool...

and for the price over a $4000.00 + turbo kit it seems to be a no brainer

FYI Dyno4mance has never and will never correct the dyno in the software to mimic other dynos higher numbers....although I am sure this is being done around the country by a few other owners of Dyno Dynamics dynos
My 2c

Last edited by Dyno4mance; Dec 22, 2006 at 05:31 AM.

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 06:20 AM

#27

tcarretti

Evolving Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 377

Likes: 0

From: San Antonio, TX

Andrew,

How would you compare this turbo to the stock Evo IX turbo? Would it be a noticeable upgrade or is it more applicable as an Evo VIII upgrade?

Curious...

Tony

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 06:34 AM

#28

94AWDcoupe

Evolved Member

iTrader: (125)

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 4,837

Likes: 29

From: Tampa

were both these cars "tuned" before the turbo swaps?

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 06:45 AM

#29

Ev0ikon

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 3,677

Likes: 9

From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}

WoW! Great results.
Good stuff Andrew! So you also do ECU flash/custom tune now?

Reply Like

Dec 22, 2006 | 07:20 AM

#30

Jeff_Jeske

Evolved Member

iTrader: (66)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 4,358

Likes: 6

From: On the track

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe

were both these cars "tuned" before the turbo swaps?

If his buddy had a previous baseline run on that particular dyno I would guess yes but its still a legit question.

If I already had injectors, a strong clutch, and a FMIC I would be placing an order.

Reply Like

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 12
Next
Last