Finally, wicked affordable camshafts....
#62
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
how do you know if u put the gsc s2 or s3 you wont make more power?
theres no way to really test it unless its done back to back on 2 cars
one tuned for cosworth then gsc dropped in to see if it gains or lose's
one tuned for gsc then drop the cosworth in to see if it gains or lose's
if the cosworth gain in gsc tune car and the gsc cams lose power in the cosworth tuned car then youll know which 1 is better. but then again is some1 gonna waste their time comparing cosworth to 3 different gsc cams lol doubt it, the people that actually care are the people with exactly 600$ in their pockets. and whether they work or not they have to stick with them cause if they sell them and get 400 theyre not gonna waste another 200$ on antoher gamble
cheers!
theres no way to really test it unless its done back to back on 2 cars
one tuned for cosworth then gsc dropped in to see if it gains or lose's
one tuned for gsc then drop the cosworth in to see if it gains or lose's
if the cosworth gain in gsc tune car and the gsc cams lose power in the cosworth tuned car then youll know which 1 is better. but then again is some1 gonna waste their time comparing cosworth to 3 different gsc cams lol doubt it, the people that actually care are the people with exactly 600$ in their pockets. and whether they work or not they have to stick with them cause if they sell them and get 400 theyre not gonna waste another 200$ on antoher gamble
cheers!
#63
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: iN dI CaRiBbEaN
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DAVE:
Where was the additional power made (rpm range)?
What about torque figures?
What rpm do we have to rev to, or can we remain within the stock Redline?
Where there any power or torque losses down low?
Can we see a dyno graph of before & after to see the powerband of your cams? On the cars that you've tested.
These sound real interesting..eager to kno more!!!!
Where was the additional power made (rpm range)?
What about torque figures?
What rpm do we have to rev to, or can we remain within the stock Redline?
Where there any power or torque losses down low?
Can we see a dyno graph of before & after to see the powerband of your cams? On the cars that you've tested.
These sound real interesting..eager to kno more!!!!
#64
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: houston
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to say "set them at 0 and call it a day" can't be ideal, can it? I mean, a stump pulling 2.3l stroker vs. a high rev'ing 2.0 l screamer with all other things being equal, is going to want different cam settings, no? A car used for 1/4 mile vs. a road course car will want different cam settings, no?
#65
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
David if u had read my post carefully u would have seen that i said "now if these cams are somehow developed for u and or by u,or there is some other unknown reason for not releasing this information, then this post does not apply and i am sorry for wasting your time reading this."
#67
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how do you know if u put the gsc s2 or s3 you wont make more power?
theres no way to really test it unless its done back to back on 2 cars
one tuned for cosworth then gsc dropped in to see if it gains or lose's
one tuned for gsc then drop the cosworth in to see if it gains or lose's
if the cosworth gain in gsc tune car and the gsc cams lose power in the cosworth tuned car then youll know which 1 is better. but then again is some1 gonna waste their time comparing cosworth to 3 different gsc cams lol doubt it, the people that actually care are the people with exactly 600$ in their pockets. and whether they work or not they have to stick with them cause if they sell them and get 400 theyre not gonna waste another 200$ on antoher gamble
cheers!
theres no way to really test it unless its done back to back on 2 cars
one tuned for cosworth then gsc dropped in to see if it gains or lose's
one tuned for gsc then drop the cosworth in to see if it gains or lose's
if the cosworth gain in gsc tune car and the gsc cams lose power in the cosworth tuned car then youll know which 1 is better. but then again is some1 gonna waste their time comparing cosworth to 3 different gsc cams lol doubt it, the people that actually care are the people with exactly 600$ in their pockets. and whether they work or not they have to stick with them cause if they sell them and get 400 theyre not gonna waste another 200$ on antoher gamble
cheers!
If you changed just one part that had any significant impact on intake or exhaust flow, you would have to completely re-test everything to see how each set of cams reacted to the change. Anything that impacted the speed or density of the incoming air charge or outgoing exhaust flow would interact with the cams.
So, if you want to know which cams are better, you'd need to be a bit more thorough with your testing.
You would basically need 5 cars each with 10 different combinations of parts for each car. Then you test each car and each combination with 3 different cams. That's 150 tests. If you do 3 dyno pulls per test, you would have done 450 dyno pulls. Then you will see if one cam consistently makes more power than another. And even with that, I promise there will be some combinations that will make more power on the cam that loses the test. It should only take about a month and cost $250,000.00. Be careful changing all those cams. I'd hate to see you strip out a jornal bolt and have to buy a new head and start all over again.
#68
[QUOTE=EvO6-RS2;3954378]DAVE:
Where was the additional power made (rpm range)?
**The power was higher throughout the RPM band on each car we installed them in with a turbo sized GT30 or larger.
What about torque figures?
**Torque increased equally, about 40 ft lbs and 40 whp is the least we have seen for gains on both.
What rpm do we have to rev to, or can we remain within the stock Redline?
**Yes, stock redline will still show an increase.
Where there any power or torque losses down low?
**No.
Can we see a dyno graph of before & after to see the powerband of your cams? On the cars that you've tested.
**Yes, I can do that eventually. Right now I am deciding whether or not I am going to just lock this thread and post all this on our site........
240,
I am sure you have built turbo combinations that make more than our 1,000+ hp EVO. Now do it with a 2 liter, not that I care.
You are also ASSuming too many things. First off MOST EVO heads that come through here do not require milling. Second if they do it is a very slight clean up of the head, MAYBE .010, which will have no effect on the timing marks. Also, Jarrod's car has these cams in it, the head is BONE STOCK NO PORT WORK WHAT-SO-EVER.
Thanks for playing along with "The Actual Facts" we'll be back next week again at 12 pm EST, tune in then when David Buschur states, "I am pompus but I sure am fast."
Where was the additional power made (rpm range)?
**The power was higher throughout the RPM band on each car we installed them in with a turbo sized GT30 or larger.
What about torque figures?
**Torque increased equally, about 40 ft lbs and 40 whp is the least we have seen for gains on both.
What rpm do we have to rev to, or can we remain within the stock Redline?
**Yes, stock redline will still show an increase.
Where there any power or torque losses down low?
**No.
Can we see a dyno graph of before & after to see the powerband of your cams? On the cars that you've tested.
**Yes, I can do that eventually. Right now I am deciding whether or not I am going to just lock this thread and post all this on our site........
240,
I am sure you have built turbo combinations that make more than our 1,000+ hp EVO. Now do it with a 2 liter, not that I care.
You are also ASSuming too many things. First off MOST EVO heads that come through here do not require milling. Second if they do it is a very slight clean up of the head, MAYBE .010, which will have no effect on the timing marks. Also, Jarrod's car has these cams in it, the head is BONE STOCK NO PORT WORK WHAT-SO-EVER.
Thanks for playing along with "The Actual Facts" we'll be back next week again at 12 pm EST, tune in then when David Buschur states, "I am pompus but I sure am fast."
#69
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: High-Plains Desert
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL...Dave you crack me up. I understand your frustration though, some people on this board have nothing better to do than talk smack when they have no clue or experience in the matters.
My question is, you stated GT30 or bigger...does this also apply to 50-trims?
My question is, you stated GT30 or bigger...does this also apply to 50-trims?
#70
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
The nature of cams in general makes this impossible.
If you changed just one part that had any significant impact on intake or exhaust flow, you would have to completely re-test everything to see how each set of cams reacted to the change. Anything that impacted the speed or density of the incoming air charge or outgoing exhaust flow would interact with the cams.
So, if you want to know which cams are better, you'd need to be a bit more thorough with your testing.
You would basically need 5 cars each with 10 different combinations of parts for each car. Then you test each car and each combination with 3 different cams. That's 150 tests. If you do 3 dyno pulls per test, you would have done 450 dyno pulls. Then you will see if one cam consistently makes more power than another. And even with that, I promise there will be some combinations that will make more power on the cam that loses the test. It should only take about a month and cost $250,000.00. Be careful changing all those cams. I'd hate to see you strip out a jornal bolt and have to buy a new head and start all over again.
If you changed just one part that had any significant impact on intake or exhaust flow, you would have to completely re-test everything to see how each set of cams reacted to the change. Anything that impacted the speed or density of the incoming air charge or outgoing exhaust flow would interact with the cams.
So, if you want to know which cams are better, you'd need to be a bit more thorough with your testing.
You would basically need 5 cars each with 10 different combinations of parts for each car. Then you test each car and each combination with 3 different cams. That's 150 tests. If you do 3 dyno pulls per test, you would have done 450 dyno pulls. Then you will see if one cam consistently makes more power than another. And even with that, I promise there will be some combinations that will make more power on the cam that loses the test. It should only take about a month and cost $250,000.00. Be careful changing all those cams. I'd hate to see you strip out a jornal bolt and have to buy a new head and start all over again.
lol a little more in depth than mine... but ya... i cant decied if im ever going to change the turbo. thats my biggest problem. if i plan to stick with the stocker than ill go with the gsc s1 since they have yet to show bad results, but if i end up changing the turbo i can go with cosworth and ill be okay with the stocker and okay with any upgrade.
cheers!
#71
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave,
You said that the cams did not do well with the smaller turbos, does that mean they actually lost power compared to HKS or revolver cams, or they just didn't provide enough gains to justify the aggressiveness of the cam? I'm asking because of the situation where someone may be upgrading the cams while they still have a smaller turbo but are planning to upgrade their turbo in the future. Would you recommend buying cams twice or would these cams still provide an increase in power over stock comparable to that of HKS or revolver cams.
Thanks.
You said that the cams did not do well with the smaller turbos, does that mean they actually lost power compared to HKS or revolver cams, or they just didn't provide enough gains to justify the aggressiveness of the cam? I'm asking because of the situation where someone may be upgrading the cams while they still have a smaller turbo but are planning to upgrade their turbo in the future. Would you recommend buying cams twice or would these cams still provide an increase in power over stock comparable to that of HKS or revolver cams.
Thanks.
#72
#74
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
You are also ASSuming too many things. First off MOST EVO heads that come through here do not require milling. Second if they do it is a very slight clean up of the head, MAYBE .010, which will have no effect on the timing marks. Also, Jarrod's car has these cams in it, the head is BONE STOCK NO PORT WORK WHAT-SO-EVER.
Thanks for playing along with "The Actual Facts" we'll be back next week again at 12 pm EST, tune in then when David Buschur states, "I am pompus but I sure am fast."
Thanks for playing along with "The Actual Facts" we'll be back next week again at 12 pm EST, tune in then when David Buschur states, "I am pompus but I sure am fast."
Last edited by 240Z TwinTurbo; Feb 9, 2007 at 11:17 AM.