650WHP on E85 and Meth!!! at 36lbs of Boost
#32
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
The way around 'good and bad' with porting is to demand a before/after flowbench sheet for YOUR head from the porter of your choice. That leaves little to speculation, and head porting at this power level can be worth a substantial power increase (think Honda B-series numbers).
As for the BR '280/280' cams, I assume you are referring to the new cams? Be certain.
As for the BR '280/280' cams, I assume you are referring to the new cams? Be certain.
#33
Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this a Precision Turbo, T67 Turbo with p-trim & t-4 housing? or, is it the same turbo, with a t3 housing machined to fit the p-trim wheel? I think this combination is what is called the gt37r.
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so if I wanted to run E85 in my car for daily driving and tune for a little better power....not lookin for big power...just cheaper mor epwoerful gas.....what do i need to do..??
#40
Jasil is correct.
If one looks at the specs for those cams:
http://www.briancrower.com/makes/mit...g63_evo8.shtml
There are two things that immediately come to attention. The first is the fact that these cams only give 218/216 deg of duration at 0.050", which is not ideally suited for high rpm power. Likewise, I see "106" indicated, which probably refers to LC (for both). !
If one looks at the specs for those cams:
http://www.briancrower.com/makes/mit...g63_evo8.shtml
There are two things that immediately come to attention. The first is the fact that these cams only give 218/216 deg of duration at 0.050", which is not ideally suited for high rpm power. Likewise, I see "106" indicated, which probably refers to LC (for both). !
For example, to my knowledge there is no way to compare durations of cam A measured at .050 vs cam B at 1mm. So you can't guess that a Jun 272 that has an effective duration of 235* at 1mm likely has more RPM potential than a BC 280 which 218* at .050" My current understanding is that the only way to compare would be to have each cam set and measure them for yourself.
Is someone aware of a domestic grind with more RPM potential than the BC280s?
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
We have quite a bit of meth in there so the DC were at 71% peak.
Plans for the car in order are
-Boost leak check to 40psi
-cam gears set like Ted said than play with them some on the Dyno
-C16 tune with and with out meth
-Cams
If the head ever needs to come off than port work to.
Plans for the car in order are
-Boost leak check to 40psi
-cam gears set like Ted said than play with them some on the Dyno
-C16 tune with and with out meth
-Cams
If the head ever needs to come off than port work to.
#42
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Paul boost is not allways the key We could have done 40psi if we wanted but no need if it does not make any more power. When we went from 35-37psi and only picked up 7hp there is no reason to push it harder on boost. We picked up almost 30hp going from 33-35psi.
The turbo is a T4 P trim exhaust. Talking with AMS it looks like we should get over 700hp.
The turbo is a T4 P trim exhaust. Talking with AMS it looks like we should get over 700hp.
#44
The way around 'good and bad' with porting is to demand a before/after flowbench sheet for YOUR head from the porter of your choice. That leaves little to speculation, and head porting at this power level can be worth a substantial power increase (think Honda B-series numbers).
As for the BR '280/280' cams, I assume you are referring to the new cams? Be certain.
As for the BR '280/280' cams, I assume you are referring to the new cams? Be certain.
yeah i talked to Jared and just waiting for a pm from him on spec on there new cams. I just drove 350miles up to Seattle and i did a bunch of pulls to 9000rpm plus and i tell you what it scared the **** out of me in 4th gear at 9k lol