FP EvoGreen + AMS VSR?
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston,tx
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
does anyone ever read anymore this is directly from their site!!!
"AMS recomends any car looking to run less then 650 Whp should use either the stock Throttle body or a ported stock throttle body. This will ensure your stock Idle Air control motor to remain functonal and drastically improve daily Driveability."
Reno evo is dead on with his comment, but sorry bro you threw 1200 down the ****ter!!!!!!!!!!!!
"AMS recomends any car looking to run less then 650 Whp should use either the stock Throttle body or a ported stock throttle body. This will ensure your stock Idle Air control motor to remain functonal and drastically improve daily Driveability."
Reno evo is dead on with his comment, but sorry bro you threw 1200 down the ****ter!!!!!!!!!!!!
as well i just asked ams if the VSR works with the stock ecu go to AMS's sub forum and into the intake manifold group buy and read up.
#32
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: milfburn
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if evom should issue an IQ test before handing out posting privileges.
Keep us updated Mr. Birdie, I wonder how the car will do, also if you could a custom 100 octane map that would be great.
Keep us updated Mr. Birdie, I wonder how the car will do, also if you could a custom 100 octane map that would be great.
#34
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So cali.
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL, but anyway I did do a search in the sub forum and on VSR intake manifold. It doesn't seem like there any " noticeable lost " in the low end and spooling charateristic of the turbo. All the graph I got the chance to analyze and look over, it does seem like the VSR got good gain and provide flat torque curve.
I'll be looking forward in updating you guys with the result. I'm not sure If I can provide a 100 map tune anytime soon due to the insuifficent funds. Unless you guys are willing to help me out on it =)
I'll be looking forward in updating you guys with the result. I'm not sure If I can provide a 100 map tune anytime soon due to the insuifficent funds. Unless you guys are willing to help me out on it =)
#36
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
does anyone ever read anymore this is directly from their site!!!
"AMS recomends any car looking to run less then 650 Whp should use either the stock Throttle body or a ported stock throttle body. This will ensure your stock Idle Air control motor to remain functonal and drastically improve daily Driveability."
Reno evo is dead on with his comment, but sorry bro you threw 1200 down the ****ter!!!!!!!!!!!!
"AMS recomends any car looking to run less then 650 Whp should use either the stock Throttle body or a ported stock throttle body. This will ensure your stock Idle Air control motor to remain functonal and drastically improve daily Driveability."
Reno evo is dead on with his comment, but sorry bro you threw 1200 down the ****ter!!!!!!!!!!!!
look @ post #81
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=246348&page=6
AMS shows a great increase of power while making less than 650 whp.....
I cant wait to see how this intake manifold does on a stock-ish style turbo.
my guess is he will see +20 whp when tuned & even more power if he spins it past 7500.
i have seen several other threads that shows the stock int mani hurts power above 7,500 revs.
#38
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
It isn't so much a question of power, or even displacement, but about rpm, and how well (or poorly) everything in the powertrain is able to support mass air flow at rpm. As for the referenced thread, a GT30R equipped setup with a load of supporting hardware isn't exactly representative of a relatively mundane, stock turbo car, so I'd be cautious in drawing comparisons.
Setups that make use of higher rpm stand to benefit more. Setups that cannot stand to benefit less. The pricetag however, remains the same.
Setups that make use of higher rpm stand to benefit more. Setups that cannot stand to benefit less. The pricetag however, remains the same.
#39
Evolved Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I might be completely wrong here, but I think it should help out quite a bit. There's a dyno graph on the AMS forum, Martin's car accually, showing very nice gains on a gt30 based turbo.
Small turbo's pretty much fall off when it comes to top end, I'm thinking the VSR intake mani would help keep the power steady, and keep that to a minimum.
*edit* I posted this before Ted B's post was posted..
Which I didn't even think of, I believe Martin's car is using an AEM EMS, plus a host of other go-fast goodies.. But you still might see nice gains, whether or not it's worth the price is up to you though..
Small turbo's pretty much fall off when it comes to top end, I'm thinking the VSR intake mani would help keep the power steady, and keep that to a minimum.
*edit* I posted this before Ted B's post was posted..
Which I didn't even think of, I believe Martin's car is using an AEM EMS, plus a host of other go-fast goodies.. But you still might see nice gains, whether or not it's worth the price is up to you though..
Last edited by Frenchy4g63; Feb 27, 2007 at 03:44 PM.
#40
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
I might also toss out that increasing displacement while all else remains equal effectively makes the turbo effectively smaller with respect to rpm - since someone implied that the usefulness of the manifold was somehow connected.
Just FYI
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
I was wondering the same thing about this manifold. Doing some kind of exchange with ported stock units or similar is a pain the *** when it's your only car. Easier to buy something outright if you have the money, and have it in place for the next turbo upgrade. On the DSMs a good SMIM was worth a solid 3+ lbs/min on turbos similar in size to the EVO Green/20gLT at the SAME boost, which is very important for pump gas power, as well as the more obvious high rpm race gas performance. The dyno chart in the other thread shows a very small loss in low end, much less than I got from simply switching from HKS 272s to 280s. Thanks for the link WOT.
Edit> Of course with the testing done at lower boost, and the turbo not maxed out, there is plenty of airflow still available. With the turbo maxed out on race gas I'm not sure the gains will be very impressive.
Edit> Of course with the testing done at lower boost, and the turbo not maxed out, there is plenty of airflow still available. With the turbo maxed out on race gas I'm not sure the gains will be very impressive.
Last edited by kjewer1; Feb 27, 2007 at 08:25 PM.