WARNING- Ebay O2 housing from ssautochrome
Mar 12, 2007, 07:07 PM
#77
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree, its like they had a bad one and welded in a piece to make make it decent to send to someone.
David, how much do o2's help on stock turbos with bolton's and flashes?
Mar 13, 2007, 01:00 AM
#83
I recently bought one and i got the same bungs from the bottom picture, but i think they did a better job on mine...Hold on...never mind i got the same ****ty one you got......good thing you brought this up i'm going to ask for an exchange or refund....
Last edited by RickU; Mar 13, 2007 at 01:13 AM.
Mar 13, 2007, 04:52 AM
#84
Evolving Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
problem is their website states that they do not offer refunds. Papyal offers buyer protection if the advertised product is different than what was received. I e-mailed them and if I don't hear back i'm filing my paypal claim, so that's going to take some 6 weeks. this sucks totaly nesses up my plans for my tune this weekend. if anyone has any luck returning their crappy one to SSA, post it up what happens so we know
Mar 13, 2007, 07:28 AM
#86
I haven't done back to back dyno testing of the good housing on a reflashed stock turbo'd EVO. We've installed them on that combination but not back to back on the dyno. The car I tested it on was mine, at the time it was making about 330 whp (if I remember correctly) and the power gain was very close to 15 whp. No other changes.
Mar 13, 2007, 09:14 AM
#89
Evolving Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so then maybe SSA is now following the invida housing model? still BS though cuz the craftmanship is garbage and the advertised picture was way off compared to what a couple of us received recently. no e-mail back from SSA as of yet on my end
