Shearer 35R dyno results
Mar 14, 2007, 08:06 AM
#21
Evolved Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well make sure you are running the right octane to boost that high.
and make sure you know exactly what your doing before you boost anymore.. its never smart to do or have things done that you dont understand.
BTW, Nice numbers!! if my statement above doesnt apply, and you got it all figured out, congrats! looks good!
and make sure you know exactly what your doing before you boost anymore.. its never smart to do or have things done that you dont understand.
BTW, Nice numbers!! if my statement above doesnt apply, and you got it all figured out, congrats! looks good!
Mar 14, 2007, 08:14 AM
#22
he has tuned STI's at 28-29psi on 93 pump with no problems at all but i dont know if that has anything to do with the 4G63. Ill tell him to spray meth when we do turn up the boost 
Thanks for the heads up ill make sure to tell him that!
Thanks for the heads up ill make sure to tell him that!
Last edited by Derek888; Mar 14, 2007 at 08:29 AM.
Mar 14, 2007, 10:16 AM
#24
gt35r is a more efficient turbo, which will blow cooler air, so you might be able to squeek more then that without it getting too knock happy, I don't know though I've never tried. On the stock turbo I wouldn't advise too much over 22-23psi, as that will get knock happy.
Just seems like a lot of parroting going on in the forums, at 26psi the GT35r is just getting into the meat of the efficiency island.
Derek888 your car is beautiful and looks to be very well setup, good luck my friend
Mar 14, 2007, 10:26 AM
#26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That stroker kit probably has a lower compression.
The dyno graph looks to normal to have any significant problems, if it was pulling as much timing as it should be to run that much boost on pump gas the graph would be all over the place; nowhere near that consistant...
The dyno graph looks to normal to have any significant problems, if it was pulling as much timing as it should be to run that much boost on pump gas the graph would be all over the place; nowhere near that consistant...
Mar 14, 2007, 10:40 AM
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
he said right off the bat he was running 93 octane only....assuming this is the same 93 octane as found in the states, then running 26 psi is
BAD news....even more so if you're cranking up higher boost.
This is also assuming you're running stock compression.....i think you should answer this question Derek, we're all waiting for the "BOOM" sound....
BAD news....even more so if you're cranking up higher boost.
This is also assuming you're running stock compression.....i think you should answer this question Derek, we're all waiting for the "BOOM" sound....
Mar 14, 2007, 10:50 AM
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: milfburn
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would imagine HKS would have competent tuners and that the car is running well.
Maybe 93 octane in japan is more like 95-96 octane in USA, I don't know and I don't feel like looking it up.
Maybe 93 octane in japan is more like 95-96 octane in USA, I don't know and I don't feel like looking it up.
Mar 14, 2007, 10:51 AM
#30
I'm not waiting for the boom sound, I wouldn't wish that on anyone, wtf man?
I will admit that I didnt see that it was 93 octane, but I was on my phone so that's my excuse hah...my other statements still stand though, it's a more efficient turbo, it could be very possible.
I will admit that I didnt see that it was 93 octane, but I was on my phone so that's my excuse hah...my other statements still stand though, it's a more efficient turbo, it could be very possible.