12.00 in the AMS EVO8
Jun 7, 2003, 11:39 AM
#31
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I give you props...from the Subaru camp! Very impressive. That is why I want to go with the EVO. It is so damn easy to milk the HP out of those things!
Very nice run...damn that car is a rocket...No Nitrous right? If you used Nitrous, I take back everything that I said above. If not, congratulations.
Andy
Very nice run...damn that car is a rocket...No Nitrous right? If you used Nitrous, I take back everything that I said above. If not, congratulations.
Andy
I'll have to bring my ride out to you guys onces I actually have the time.
and it holds over 300tq all the way to 6000 rpms!!! niiiiiiiiiiiiiice!!!
Jun 7, 2003, 06:18 PM
#39
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zeus
Nice now I'd like to see it with a reprogrammed ECU to take advantage of the full capabilities of the car... Are they working on anything?
Nice
now I'd like to see it with a reprogrammed ECU to take advantage of the full capabilities of the car... Are they working on anything?
Jun 7, 2003, 06:39 PM
#41
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: california
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
daaaaaamnn..12.00 flat!! i reacted the same way the guy did on the video..*aaaaooohhhhh* 
good luck with the time slips and keep on doin what youre doin. seems to be working 
good luck with the time slips and keep on doin what youre doin. seems to be working
Jun 7, 2003, 07:45 PM
#42
Originally posted by BADWRX
If you think they are running that HP, and those times, with those mods, without custom ECU maps, then you are high man!
If you think they are running that HP, and those times, with those mods, without custom ECU maps, then you are high man!
Buscher is getting 340's without cams using a AFC... why is it that too many people here have no concept of the differences in engine's efficiencies... just because other engine systems have to fight and claw there way to greater gains, doesn't mean everyone has to. Be willing to bet your wrong...
Jun 7, 2003, 07:59 PM
#43
Originally posted by Zeus
Buscher is getting 340's without cams using a AFC... why is it that too many people here have no concept of the differences in engine's efficiencies... just because other engine systems have to fight and claw there way to greater gains, doesn't mean everyone has to. Be willing to bet your wrong...
Buscher is getting 340's without cams using a AFC... why is it that too many people here have no concept of the differences in engine's efficiencies... just because other engine systems have to fight and claw there way to greater gains, doesn't mean everyone has to. Be willing to bet your wrong...
Jun 7, 2003, 07:59 PM
#44
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We probably could not get anything more HP-wise with the e-manage since we are getting good timing up top and our A/F is right where I want it. What we would benefit from is the timing control on the bottom end and gain another about 20ft-lbs of torque. We just finished a customers EVO8 - 355whp and 317ft-lbs of torque at 20psi boost (holding 20psi) and HKS 264/264 cams. We gained a lot of torque by adding timing in the 3k-4k rpm range. Logging stock timing you only get about 4deg-6deg advance under full boost when you start making good power (high airflow readings). Adding about 4deg of adv in that area gets you some good trq gains as I'm sure Kyle can attest to
