12.00 in the AMS EVO8
#47
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
Originally posted by Alfriedesq
Buscher is using a 2wd which does not read like a 4wd - at least thats what I have been able to figure out
Buscher is using a 2wd which does not read like a 4wd - at least thats what I have been able to figure out
#48
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I do happen to know alot about tuning...I am a damn tuner on the side for Christ's sake.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
#49
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BADWRX
Well, I do happen to know alot about tuning...I am a damn tuner on the side for Christ's sake.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
Well, I do happen to know alot about tuning...I am a damn tuner on the side for Christ's sake.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Originally posted by BADWRX
Well, I do happen to know alot about tuning...I am a damn tuner on the side for Christ's sake.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
Well, I do happen to know alot about tuning...I am a damn tuner on the side for Christ's sake.
I guarantee that these guys are running some kind of ECU enhancement.
Did you not see them write about adding more advance between 3-4K rpm's?
Not to butt heads, for the abbrasiveness, sorry.
#53
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
Originally posted by Evilution
Why is there even an argument about that? They're using an Apexi S-AFC. They listed it in the mods on the very first post. Every tuner running 12's with a stage 1 kit right now are using some sort of AFC. So why the skepticism?
Why is there even an argument about that? They're using an Apexi S-AFC. They listed it in the mods on the very first post. Every tuner running 12's with a stage 1 kit right now are using some sort of AFC. So why the skepticism?
#55
Originally posted by boiwunder
Here is a comarison of dyno runs with and without the cams, enjoy.
-kris
Here is a comarison of dyno runs with and without the cams, enjoy.
-kris
#56
Originally posted by Zeus
My point was that AMS and Buchur Racing were only using an AFC. BADWRX seems to be trying to say that those gains are not possible without a more "advanced" tuning tool... The added timing between 3-4k comment was about "...a customer's car..." and not the "12.00 sec AMS car". I fail to see why this is improbable...
My point was that AMS and Buchur Racing were only using an AFC. BADWRX seems to be trying to say that those gains are not possible without a more "advanced" tuning tool... The added timing between 3-4k comment was about "...a customer's car..." and not the "12.00 sec AMS car". I fail to see why this is improbable...
Mitsubishi ECUs do much better with just an AFC. Hell, up until last year, Buschur ran a VPC on a stock ECU in his 7 second drag car. No timing advance control at all.
#57
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have not played with cams gears yet on the EVO, although you can see decent gains when timing them out on a DSM 4G63. All we are using for ECU modifications is the S-AFC II. There are no secret parts on the car, just some common sense tuning and a few little Mitsubishi tuning tricks (most of the hard-core DSM'ers already know them).
#59
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm curious with your dyno plots if you were running pump gas for both. If not, did you run the car with the stock cams on race gas. My understanding was the boost levels indicated in the graph were used for the 12.00 run, which was on race gas. Just trying to get a better understanding of the graphs and comparisons between the two, no disrespect towards your accomplishment is intended.
#60
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by sneakychaos
I'm curious with your dyno plots if you were running pump gas for both. If not, did you run the car with the stock cams on race gas. My understanding was the boost levels indicated in the graph were used for the 12.00 run, which was on race gas. Just trying to get a better understanding of the graphs and comparisons between the two, no disrespect towards your accomplishment is intended.
I'm curious with your dyno plots if you were running pump gas for both. If not, did you run the car with the stock cams on race gas. My understanding was the boost levels indicated in the graph were used for the 12.00 run, which was on race gas. Just trying to get a better understanding of the graphs and comparisons between the two, no disrespect towards your accomplishment is intended.