thoughts on weapon R intake manifold?
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thoughts on weapon R intake manifold?
anyone using this or seen results?
a friend of mine has one for sale for $400 and im debating on it..pending what evom guys think of it,results etc..
now should i spend $400 for the weapon R intake manifold or should i just spend $75 on a buschur stock ported intake manifold?
let me know,thanks
http://lancershop.com/customer/produ...&cat=91&page=1
a friend of mine has one for sale for $400 and im debating on it..pending what evom guys think of it,results etc..
now should i spend $400 for the weapon R intake manifold or should i just spend $75 on a buschur stock ported intake manifold?
let me know,thanks
http://lancershop.com/customer/produ...&cat=91&page=1
Last edited by GT35REVO8; May 21, 2007 at 10:06 PM.
#2
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go with Buschur no questions asked. Lot of people are making so much power on ported one plus no need to worry about cracking. If you don't have a ported head, do that as well if you can, that should help you along with the intake manifold.
Maybe stock one doesnt look good as much as an aftermarket one but it surely works well and better.
Maybe stock one doesnt look good as much as an aftermarket one but it surely works well and better.
Last edited by memo3; May 21, 2007 at 10:42 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...51&postcount=5
Where's yours?
Last edited by Erik@MIL.SPEC; Aug 4, 2007 at 12:19 AM.
#13
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
Really?
at least all 4 runners are of the same length vs. oem. let alone that the air-horns are of a decent design, albeit a small eliptical flare, but very effective....much better than the mitsu hurdles that are placed within the oem plenum..
i have seen far uglier intake (dyno dev. only) set-ups make great power on the dyno.
i look forward to putting my weapon-r, rewelded, fluffed & buffed manifold on my evo & conduct some logs.
i agree, this manifold is nowhere near as sexy as the ams unit, but i feel the weapon-r manifold will get the job done within the rpm range that i plan on twisting my oem rod bolted engine along with my fp-grn.....i cant wait...but have too
at least all 4 runners are of the same length vs. oem. let alone that the air-horns are of a decent design, albeit a small eliptical flare, but very effective....much better than the mitsu hurdles that are placed within the oem plenum..
i have seen far uglier intake (dyno dev. only) set-ups make great power on the dyno.
i look forward to putting my weapon-r, rewelded, fluffed & buffed manifold on my evo & conduct some logs.
i agree, this manifold is nowhere near as sexy as the ams unit, but i feel the weapon-r manifold will get the job done within the rpm range that i plan on twisting my oem rod bolted engine along with my fp-grn.....i cant wait...but have too
Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Oct 16, 2007 at 07:21 PM.