Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

RMR or WORKS reflash?? Anyone install yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2003, 01:43 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Daveyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: here
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RMR or WORKS reflash?? Anyone install yet?

Trying to decide on one or the other. Obviously looking for the best bang for the buck and most reliable....
Old Jun 20, 2003, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
 
evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: RMR or WORKS reflash?? Anyone install yet?

Originally posted by Daveyd
Trying to decide on one or the other. Obviously looking for the best bang for the buck and most reliable....
I'm in the same boat ....................... well lets weigh what we know.....


RMR PROS

probably knows our better than anybody

can tune for just about any brand of turbo back, open filter kit, etc.

Uses the stock boost solenoid to control boost @ 19psi all the way to redline

an external boost controller can be used w/o a problem


RMR CONS

No 93 Octane map (only 91 so far)

$150 or so more expensive!

no 3 year warranty or $100 credit on buying its parts with the reflash ... yet

Second reflash is not free .... but it is cheaper which is good

has anybody seen the RMR reflash dyno graph Is one even available yet I need to give them a call


Worksrally PROS

Great price

Industry leading warranty with $100 credit toward its parts

second reflash is free! But third and so on goes back to regular price

93 octane map available


Worksrally CONS

currently only offering flashes for its own parts (other mods may work but its not gauranteed)

Does not hold boost to redline (this may or may not be perceived as a con)

some believe that the power curve is a bit conservative (this also may or may not be perceived as a con)


why is the works evo only putting out 205hp stock on a dynojet

Last edited by evo1; Jun 20, 2003 at 02:32 PM.
Old Jun 20, 2003, 02:55 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
IS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SoCal - Bangkok
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much is the RMR reflash? I checked their site and found nothing on this.
Old Jun 20, 2003, 02:58 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
 
evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by IS2000
How much is the RMR reflash? I checked their site and found nothing on this.
$575 .... works is $404.10 for people on the preorder list, and I believe $450 otherwise.
Old Jun 20, 2003, 03:44 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
IS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SoCal - Bangkok
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$575 with 91 octane map seems to be a great. Anyone want to buy a brand new S-AFC?
Old Jun 21, 2003, 09:02 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Daveyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: here
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any purchasers responses yet??
Old Jun 21, 2003, 09:39 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
silvrevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Big Red Country
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im suprised that there arnt a ton more people interested in these?
Old Jun 21, 2003, 10:14 AM
  #8  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
umiami80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still believe a SAFC is better, you can custom tune your ride per each bolton and the car will still recognise whatever boost you thorw at it and teh amount of airt comming in and the temp comming in, the only benefit I see for the ECU is re-worked rev limiter, but the cames really can't make power past 7500 anyways so I reallyt think the SAFC II is the way to go.
Old Jun 21, 2003, 10:27 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Jonasan50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like my S-AFC too... The only problem with that is the dealership knows you've been playin...
Old Jun 21, 2003, 12:20 PM
  #10  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
S-AFC = potential service problems

Reflash = stealth mode baby
Old Jun 21, 2003, 12:42 PM
  #11  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by umiami80
I still believe a SAFC is better, you can custom tune your ride per each bolton and the car will still recognise whatever boost you thorw at it and teh amount of airt comming in and the temp comming in, the only benefit I see for the ECU is re-worked rev limiter, but the cames really can't make power past 7500 anyways so I reallyt think the SAFC II is the way to go.
You forgot about the stock timing curve... lacking to say the least. One can, of course, argue that there are people making big power without timing control... Bet you *** not one of them would turn down tuning their timing if they could.
Old Jun 21, 2003, 12:53 PM
  #12  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
umiami80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Timing is self adjusting based on detonation and fuel trims. You take away the fuel and get teh car to run right and keep knock low your timing will jump to a respectable level, right not it is too rich to get proper timing and yanks it, smae with running too lean. My DSM ran this way, the ecu/maf setup is essentially the same so you may get 18-21 degress of timing on pump gas with a SAFC, I managed 19 on my talon at 21PSI on a T3/T4 650CFM turbo, car moved.
Old Jun 21, 2003, 01:18 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
ADMstunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
until there are dyno plots with stock setup + map and upgraded setup (exh/ 02 simulator/ intake/ higher boost)+ map i think all this is just a waste of breath. or waste of key strokes?
Old Jun 21, 2003, 01:28 PM
  #14  
KK
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (4)
 
KK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by umiami80
Timing is self adjusting based on detonation and fuel trims. You take away the fuel and get teh car to run right and keep knock low your timing will jump to a respectable level, right not it is too rich to get proper timing and yanks it, smae with running too lean. My DSM ran this way, the ecu/maf setup is essentially the same so you may get 18-21 degress of timing on pump gas with a SAFC, I managed 19 on my talon at 21PSI on a T3/T4 650CFM turbo, car moved.
Having seen numerous dyno plots of fuel only tuned Evos and then Evos that have had timing adjustments, I would have disagree on that one. You can significantly smooth out the power band with timing adjustments and even pick up some low-end torque as well.

Mark
Old Jun 21, 2003, 01:40 PM
  #15  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
umiami80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course being able to set timing will net more power, such as a PMS, but having a SAFC will allow you so much room for future tuning and to adjust for every single mod. If you timing is constant and so is your fuel curve, you will run into trouble and possible detonation problems. I think teh EVO should get a Version of teh DSM link which is like a SAFC that shows EVERYTHING and allows you to set your timing as well, and you only have to set it once, shut it off and leave the car alone until future moding.

As for me a SAFC and a APEXi ITC would be perfect.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 AM.