Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

20Lt Green vs. GT3071..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2007, 07:39 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
reeferman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20Lt Green vs. GT3071..

Which is the all around best performer? Cannot decide between the two. Drag racing, road racing, street? Videos would be nice.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 08:20 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
For street use, on pump gas, I´d say the 20G-LT, a.k.a., the EvoGreen, would be clearly superior to the 3071. The Green can be had for a total price which makes the 3071 comparatively speaking a loser´s proposition. I don´t know anything about Drag Racing or closed-circuit, though. So I´ll just keep my trap shut.

The compressor side of the two turbos, move almost identical air at about 48-49 lbs./min. So it goes to reason that peak power is gonna be fairly close. Although, and just maybe, the 3071 would exhibit a slight power advantage at the highest boost levels on race gas. On pump gas however, the Green is the clear winner. The 30 requires high octane fuel to really get into its sweet spot.

In a way the 20G-LT is an overachiever as it outspools the 3071 on journal bearings. The 3071 on the other hand, is laggier inspite of spinning on a ball bearings. Furthermore, if you should go with the 3071, then you´ll need a complete turbo kit, whereas the 20G-LT is a direct bolt-on.

Ultimately, the 20G-LT gives faster spool up, similar peak power potential at a considerably lower overall price. So for the street at least, the 20G-LT is clearly more turbo for the money.

Last edited by sparky; Jun 29, 2007 at 09:24 AM.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 09:05 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
s2kguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 20g is hard to beat for the money and easy of installation.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 09:32 AM
  #4  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
BostonEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the avrage times run ona 20g/lt On pump gas in the 1/4 , Im sure i can find it on here somewhere. But might as well post the comparison =)
Old Jun 29, 2007, 09:49 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by BostonEvo
What are the avrage times run ona 20g/lt On pump gas in the 1/4 , Im sure i can find it on here somewhere. But might as well post the comparison =)
You´ll find it by searching on the Drag Racing sub-forum. However, I´d be willing to bet you my allowance and a week´s worth of lunch money, that given the same setup and driver using straight pump gas, the Green turbo will beat an identically equipped 3071 car in the 1/4.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 09:56 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 2,046
Received 75 Likes on 65 Posts
Average would be LOW 11's... but it has broken into the 10's.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 11:24 AM
  #7  
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
SIGSP2340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Between those two turbos. I would prolly go with the 20gLt. It has been proved well into the mid to upper 400Whp range on Buschurs dyno and Its a great,easy bolt on.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 12:43 PM
  #8  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
my 20g should be in soon soon, I can't wait to see what kind of power I can get out of it on pump gas since that's what I'll be running 99.9% of the time. I've seem some figures placing it from 350-400awhp with various supporting mods.

I have the 20G, ported/coated stock mani on the way and will be ordering the FMIC.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 07:23 PM
  #9  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
reeferman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding was that you really had to turn up the boost on the 20LT to make high hp numbers(25-30psi). That would put it well into the race gas range. On pump gas I thought the 20Lt only produced about 20hp over the IX turbo. The 3071 is capable of close to 400hp pump gas with 20-21psi. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I would be running pump gas just about all the time with maybe just a splash of race gas for added protection.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 07:48 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
the two turbos spool nearly the same. at 21psi the 20g typically makes 360-370 whp. the 3071 makes 400whp at 21psi. you wont find a post of anyone maxing out a 3071 at max boost 35+psi falling to 27 at redline. the 3071 is a turbo that no one chooses. for the money the 20gLT makes much more sense. also when someone considers the 3071 they usually choose the 3076 for more power potential. I did alot of surfing on this turbo looking for numbers. The highest numbers I found were 440-460 dynojet. But the setups didn't sound maxed out.
Old Jun 29, 2007, 07:57 PM
  #11  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
The 3071 spooling the same as an EvoGreen doesn't sound right to me, but I am by no means an expert. I could certainly be wrong, but I just don't remember 3071 owners reporting stock-like spool.
Old Jun 30, 2007, 07:34 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mrdevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ct
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the old br440 kit had the 3071. They made 380-400 on pump and made closer to 450 with some boost. I don't think either setup was pushing it to the max though.
Old Jun 30, 2007, 08:11 AM
  #13  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I have seen Greens make 380 on 91 and 400 on 93
Old Jun 30, 2007, 08:33 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by atlvalet
I have seen Greens make 380 on 91 and 400 on 93
and there is a guy on here that made 440 on 93 octane with the 3071 at 25psi. I was quoting average numbers not the highest. buschur had a car that made 360whp on his low reading dyno on pump. shiv had a car do 370 on his low reading dyno as well. both on the 3071. there are lots of ways to run the 3071 as far as hotside goes so spool reports are gonna vary.
Old Jun 30, 2007, 08:36 AM
  #15  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
The 370 on Shiv's dyno, was that on pump?

440 on straight 93 is pretty good.


Quick Reply: 20Lt Green vs. GT3071..



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:51 AM.