turbozee

iTrader: (2)

Hi

any of you guys have a 4g64 bottom end mated with your 4g63 head with STOCK cams? can you please post dyno sheets of your setup. im looking for something on a t3/t4 50 trim or gt35r, however any dyno sheets will help. it's very important that the dyno sheets of your head with stock cams.


Thanks!

turbozee

iTrader: (2)

anyone?

Magnumpsi

iTrader: (2)

It would be kind of silly to keep stock cams on that set-up.

I have a lot of dyno sheets with a 2.4 gt35r but not stock cams. PM me if you want those.

Mitch Mckee

turbozee

iTrader: (2)

i really want to see the difference cams make. i hate putting on random parts on the car without proof

KevinD

iTrader: (56)

this is with a 2L, so a 2.4L would make even a bigger difference (and so would a 35R):




this car was tuned before the cams, and again after. this datalog lab dyno shows before and after a cam install...

Ted B

iTrader: (6)

The irony here is that upgrading to any of several popular cam sets is perhaps the most reliable, dependable means of increasing power potential available short of a larger exhaust and/or turbo. There are dozens, if not hundreds of examples of this scattered throughout this forum. The 4G63/4G64 responds to revisions in cam profiles rather well (even in largely factory trim), and improvements in power of >10% over the factory cams are not uncommon at the 300-400hp level.

turbozee

iTrader: (2)

wow, the peak numbers dont change much, but damn the entire powerband see's a gain. what cams were those?

i currently have a gt3582r. i was trying to make up my mind whether to throw in cams on my built motor(4g64 block + crank w/ 4g63 head) or not.

what cams do you guys recommend?

KevinD

iTrader: (56)

they were hks 272/272 cams. stock gears, on an evo 8.