ETS 57 trim Dyno Graph

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 31, 2007, 10:33 AM

#16

uglyevo

Evolving Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: Alaska

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by eve-slow

Ya bro. Nice numbers bro!.......bro

do you know who thats suppose to be?

Reply Like

Aug 31, 2007, 10:41 AM

#17

DS-03evo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: Central PA

Posts: 822

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Sounds great...what did you put down on just pump gas?

Reply Like

Aug 31, 2007, 09:13 PM

#18

Duby

Evolved Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: Annandale, NJ

Posts: 576

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by uglyevo

do you know who thats suppose to be?

yea, the first imitation wasn't to bad tll he forgot what else to say

Reply Like

Aug 31, 2007, 11:32 PM

#19

uglyevo

Evolving Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: Alaska

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS-03evo

Sounds great...what did you put down on just pump gas?

didn't do one on pump since I was on E90. however another car with the same kit on the same dyno made 403whp on pump 92

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 03:29 AM

#20

1mad evo

Evolving Member

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 283

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

i dont understand, is the torque at the wheels or the flywheel? because if its at the flywheel than its pretty low, i would have thought it to be at least 450 tq atf ???

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 08:34 AM

#21

uglyevo

Evolving Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: Alaska

Posts: 222

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1mad evo

i dont understand, is the torque at the wheels or the flywheel? because if its at the flywheel than its pretty low, i would have thought it to be at least 450 tq atf ???

torque has never been high on 50 trim based turbos in comparison to hp

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 08:45 AM

#22

EvoDan2004

Evolved Member

iTrader: (94)

Join Date: Feb 2005

Location: New Jersey

Posts: 8,984

Likes: 0

Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

and trq is lower yet then normal because of stock cams.

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 10:08 AM

#23

EV0lved

Evolved Member

Join Date: Jul 2006

Location: wishing i still lived in Spokane

Posts: 542

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

fuggin awesome

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 10:13 AM

#24

scorke

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Nj

Posts: 5,192

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Did you do any straight pump pulls? Without cams or seeing other turbos or a pump gas number I am not sure if its making good numbers or poor ones...

Scorke

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 10:29 AM

#25

4DR

Evolved Member

iTrader: (27)

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: New York

Posts: 519

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Good Numbers. But how is it stated that your 1200cc injectors and pump were maxed out/maxing out?? I would think those injectors would be enough to out-do your turbo.

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 10:31 AM

#26

scorke

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Nj

Posts: 5,192

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4DR

Good Numbers. But how is it stated that your 1200cc injectors and pump were maxed out/maxing out?? I would think those injectors would be enough to out-do your turbo.

Ethanol requires a lot more fuel to be burned to run at safe A/F's...E90 has less gasoline in it than E85 which requires about 30 percent more fuel.

On C16 30+ psi and 500+whp is probably attainable.

Scorke

Reply Like

Sep 1, 2007, 10:40 AM

#27

Lucas English

Evolved Member

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: Camas, WA

Posts: 793

Likes: 0

Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts

I would say 5 pulls were due to dyno carp and the other 5-8 were Duggy getting his Greddy boost control dialed in so it would not bounce all over the place.