CBRD new dyno record...
Sep 9, 2007, 04:16 PM
#61
A .018" gap definitely isn't doing anything for power. All that's telling you is the ignition needs help.
Also, the short rod ratio of a 2.3 is going to work better with more retard on the intake cam, due to the slower piston movement around BDC. This is worth considering, whether you're looking to make a big peak figure for promotional purposes, or tweaking the torque curve for more midrange focus.
Also, the short rod ratio of a 2.3 is going to work better with more retard on the intake cam, due to the slower piston movement around BDC. This is worth considering, whether you're looking to make a big peak figure for promotional purposes, or tweaking the torque curve for more midrange focus.
Sep 9, 2007, 05:52 PM
#62
Congrats Chad!!! Awesome numbers and it has to be one of the nicest looking Evo's I have seen 
. If you get a chance shoot me those logs, I would love to what they look like on a 2.3, evilgti2000@yahoo.com 
.
. If you get a chance shoot me those logs, I would love to what they look like on a 2.3, evilgti2000@yahoo.com .
Sep 9, 2007, 07:27 PM
#63
A .018" gap definitely isn't doing anything for power. All that's telling you is the ignition needs help.
Also, the short rod ratio of a 2.3 is going to work better with more retard on the intake cam, due to the slower piston movement around BDC. This is worth considering, whether you're looking to make a big peak figure for promotional purposes, or tweaking the torque curve for more midrange focus.
Also, the short rod ratio of a 2.3 is going to work better with more retard on the intake cam, due to the slower piston movement around BDC. This is worth considering, whether you're looking to make a big peak figure for promotional purposes, or tweaking the torque curve for more midrange focus.
what would I have to pay you an hour?
i really need another tech!! lol...
this car has no other purpose at the moment besides being a fun tinker car for us... but, we are being pressured to enter time attack...
cb
Oct 7, 2007, 07:25 AM
#71
lol...
the porsche didnt break the hp record, but it did beat us on torque...
996 twin turbo big wheeled k24 gt2 turbos, headers, exhaust, software..
made 440whp452wtq!
we are building a 996 tt shortly with a k24 setup with 18g wheels in it. that car should hit 500whp on pump, and probably 485wtq...
of course, it takes 85K to build one
cb
the porsche didnt break the hp record, but it did beat us on torque...
996 twin turbo big wheeled k24 gt2 turbos, headers, exhaust, software..
made 440whp452wtq!
we are building a 996 tt shortly with a k24 setup with 18g wheels in it. that car should hit 500whp on pump, and probably 485wtq...
of course, it takes 85K to build one
cb
Oct 7, 2007, 11:22 AM
#75
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol...
the porsche didnt break the hp record, but it did beat us on torque...
996 twin turbo big wheeled k24 gt2 turbos, headers, exhaust, software..
made 440whp452wtq!
we are building a 996 tt shortly with a k24 setup with 18g wheels in it. that car should hit 500whp on pump, and probably 485wtq...
of course, it takes 85K to build one
cb
the porsche didnt break the hp record, but it did beat us on torque...
996 twin turbo big wheeled k24 gt2 turbos, headers, exhaust, software..
made 440whp452wtq!
we are building a 996 tt shortly with a k24 setup with 18g wheels in it. that car should hit 500whp on pump, and probably 485wtq...
of course, it takes 85K to build one
cb
How much boost are they running?
Empty some of your PM's so I can send you one...