EVO IX - Ivey Re-Tuned for HKS Cams
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVO IX - Ivey Re-Tuned for HKS Cams
As we all know there is a huge debate between Evo IX cams on these forums. I would like to share my experiences.
For Starters mods are in sig...
I added HKS EVO IX cams and headed to Ivey for a re-tune.
Final Numbers:
358.10 whp
350.22 wtq
23.5psi, 93 octane.
In my personal opinion I feel that the stock IX cams are great. Any power gains over the stock IX cams are a bonus. These HKS cams really shine in the low - mid range. Butt dyno felt good and comparing to my existing graph I gained roughly 10whp and 20wtq from 2,500rpms to 5,000rpms.
I do not have a scanner, but if anyone near Monmouth County NJ does and is willing to scan it in for me please PM me and I will meet up with you.
at 3,000 rpms the car made:
250wtq
145whp
at 5,000 rpms car made:
330wtq
315whp
at 7,000 rpms car made:
255wtq
340whp
Special thanks to Ivey for hooking me up with great customer service and a solid tune.
Kenny how did the club go Thanks for answering all my questions, I appreciate it. Chris thanks for fixing my boost leak.
For Starters mods are in sig...
I added HKS EVO IX cams and headed to Ivey for a re-tune.
Final Numbers:
358.10 whp
350.22 wtq
23.5psi, 93 octane.
In my personal opinion I feel that the stock IX cams are great. Any power gains over the stock IX cams are a bonus. These HKS cams really shine in the low - mid range. Butt dyno felt good and comparing to my existing graph I gained roughly 10whp and 20wtq from 2,500rpms to 5,000rpms.
I do not have a scanner, but if anyone near Monmouth County NJ does and is willing to scan it in for me please PM me and I will meet up with you.
at 3,000 rpms the car made:
250wtq
145whp
at 5,000 rpms car made:
330wtq
315whp
at 7,000 rpms car made:
255wtq
340whp
Special thanks to Ivey for hooking me up with great customer service and a solid tune.
Kenny how did the club go Thanks for answering all my questions, I appreciate it. Chris thanks for fixing my boost leak.
Last edited by Srt-4 Turbo 7; Oct 12, 2007 at 10:04 PM.
#2
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty good numbers, I wish there was a baseline to compare, but regardless good numbers. They seem to fall right in line with GSC and Cosworth Cams, judging by your mods, I'd be willing to bet you gained atleast 10 peak whp
Last edited by 3000ways; Oct 13, 2007 at 10:35 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No lope, idle just as good as stock.
3000ways I did gain 10 peak whp and 22 peak wtq from these cams.
If I take a pic with my cell phone, how do I post it. I want to post my graph.
Next for me is clutch, AMS Fmic, Meth, Green
As of right now I am very happy with the car.
3000ways I did gain 10 peak whp and 22 peak wtq from these cams.
If I take a pic with my cell phone, how do I post it. I want to post my graph.
Next for me is clutch, AMS Fmic, Meth, Green
As of right now I am very happy with the car.
#9
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I need to do a cam gear then re-tune. I would like to see how much the cam gear will do for me. Some say 5-10whp. That will put me right in range with you. The HKS IX cams with the right supporting mods DO make good usable power.
Last edited by Srt-4 Turbo 7; Oct 13, 2007 at 11:54 AM.
#10
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: somewhere on the east coast
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How come you guys with the 9 cams in this post are only making 358 and 362? I know people with 9's with no cams making 360-365 whp with the usual bolt ons(turbo-back with test pipe, o2 housing, intake, boost controller, fuel pump, 23 psi 93 octane).
#12
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have only seen one 9 with turboback, 02 housing, intake, BC at 23psi, Fuel Pump and tune make 360whp. Without cams I made 350whp and 331wtq, with cams I made 358whp and 350wtq, cams just really helped out my torque curve. They didn't do too much for peak hp.
#13
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: somewhere on the east coast
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Every dyno is different, every car is different, different weather conditions.
I have only seen one 9 with turboback, 02 housing, intake, BC at 23psi, Fuel Pump and tune make 360whp. Without cams I made 350whp and 331wtq, with cams I made 358whp and 350wtq, cams just really helped out my torque curve. They didn't do too much for peak hp.
I have only seen one 9 with turboback, 02 housing, intake, BC at 23psi, Fuel Pump and tune make 360whp. Without cams I made 350whp and 331wtq, with cams I made 358whp and 350wtq, cams just really helped out my torque curve. They didn't do too much for peak hp.
Thats cool you gained some nice tq with the cams
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
I am not trying to start a debate about which cams to go with but this the type of gain I think most people expect/recieve:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=281107
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=281107