EVO IX redyno 364whp new run 12.1@113
Oct 14, 2007, 04:41 PM
#31
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys are looking at the dynos too much. 113mph can be had with a 330-340whp car so I wouldnt look at the dyno too much on this one. The average 350whp traps between 113-115mph, some go 116mph, miniscule amount go 117+
Id worry about those trap speeds, not the dyno.
Id worry about those trap speeds, not the dyno.
it was 55 at e-town sat night it was windy that play a factor no?? say wind is going against you that would not help
i mean i did a good lunch maybe different shifting will help different rpm maybe??
i know i did fast shifting NOT powershifting
Oct 14, 2007, 04:41 PM
#32
Sounds good to me!!!
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
Oct 14, 2007, 04:48 PM
#35
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont care what anybody says every track is different
every condition is different
i know i drove good to limits but maybe better shifting at different rpm i know i was not granny shifting for sure
Oct 14, 2007, 04:50 PM
#36
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good to me!!!
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
thanks sean
Oct 14, 2007, 05:09 PM
#37
Okay, you see thats where the problem is you say COULD do it, doesn't mean you can really do it. Until you do make that pass, please stop bench racing. Plus it was windy there towards the end of the night, which can easily play in the mph run.
Oct 14, 2007, 05:14 PM
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In da streetz
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree. I went quicker in my full weight 04 GSR w/SS&L with only mbc, K&N, MR BOV and a flash by yours truley. stock IC, IC pipes, stock turbo, stock cams, yada yada yada. pretty good 60' though, I wish I could have pulled a 1.6x on the stock clutch.
Oct 14, 2007, 05:17 PM
#40
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good to me!!!
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
I am sure with more aggressive shifting, it would mph more, but the cars all differ and you are on the stock clutch you may not be detecting all the slippage. Shift RPM plays a large role in the mph too because you can shift lower and actually increase mph on stock turbo cars.
Still damn good.
Sean
Oct 14, 2007, 05:43 PM
#43
I don't think anyone here is criticizing your driving (your 1.6 60ft times speak for themselves 
); but I have to agree with others on here that a bolt-on, cammed Evo IX should be trapping better than 112-113...
No need to get defensive, instead try to figure out what , if anything, is the cause. Yes, I have seen slow tracks and days where people are trapping like 3-4 mph less than they do elsewhere. Just make sure 1) no boost leaks 2) no knock at WOT (or ECU will pull timing) 3) you are shifting at the optimal point for your setup... 4) no bad tank of gas resulting in knock
thanks for posting your results
); but I have to agree with others on here that a bolt-on, cammed Evo IX should be trapping better than 112-113... No need to get defensive, instead try to figure out what , if anything, is the cause. Yes, I have seen slow tracks and days where people are trapping like 3-4 mph less than they do elsewhere. Just make sure 1) no boost leaks 2) no knock at WOT (or ECU will pull timing) 3) you are shifting at the optimal point for your setup... 4) no bad tank of gas resulting in knock
thanks for posting your results
Oct 14, 2007, 06:12 PM
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3,000rpms - 210wtq
4,000rpms - 330wtq
5,000rpms - 325wtq
6,000rpms - 300wtq
7,000rpms - 260wtq
My graph
3,000rpms - 250wtq
4,000rpms - 350wtq
5,000rpms - 325wtq
6,000rpms - 300wtq
7,000rpms - 255wtq
So from 5,000rpms on our torque curve is very similar if not identical, with you holding roughly 5wtq over me at 7,000 rpms. But at 3,000rpms I have 40wtq more and at 4,000rpms I have 20wtq more.
Regardless Stan you had good runs, a great looking car, and you can drive it. People are getting way too defensive in this thread. And yes wind will affect your mph and so will your shift points.
I need a new clutch, my clutch was slipping last night at wot from a roll so im sure it wont hold up at all if i launch it