Full Race Manifold on Evogreen IX - Yes or No?
#3
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: london, uk
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
or u could send your manifold and 02 housin to xrmoto on mlr
im sure he could do a good job portin it, then u can have them coated by one of those rally guy's u know.
i want the full race mani as well, but not sure if it's gonna give me more power, or more lag
![Wink](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
im sure he could do a good job portin it, then u can have them coated by one of those rally guy's u know.
i want the full race mani as well, but not sure if it's gonna give me more power, or more lag
#6
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](http://www.truegentleman.com/cinserra/TuningSession1DynoSheetSTD.jpg)
Theoretically, the Full-Race manifold should work with the FP Green turbo. Correct me if I am wrong.
-Carl
Last edited by Spent198; Oct 23, 2007 at 07:16 PM.
#7
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
EDIT:
Here, I will help you out.
http://www.evans-tuning.com/media.html
Click on FR Manifold Test. This is just one example of Equal-Length (significantly) outperforming "Log" manifolds.
-Carl
Last edited by Spent198; Oct 23, 2007 at 07:26 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand this porting of the stock manifold being a better solution over headers. The purpose of the equal length headers is to isolate exhaust gases into seperate pulses from the exhaust valves. Each runner will get it's own self-contained exhaust pulse which, under extreme pressure, will direct flow to the turbine housing in a non-turbulent fashion which should cause faster spoolup and good flow. There is little chance that the exhaust gases would collide with each other and back up into the head with this manifold. The 'log' manifold can, which would play havoc with the efficiency of the motor. Porting the 'log' doesn't take this problem away - it only causes better flow, but the flow is turbulent as opposed to directed like the headers would be.
Just my 2 cents.
I've had excellent results with my Megan headers as far as more torque and faster spoolup. My setup can spool just as fast as a MIVEC in the low end.
-M
Just my 2 cents.
I've had excellent results with my Megan headers as far as more torque and faster spoolup. My setup can spool just as fast as a MIVEC in the low end.
-M
#9
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand this porting of the stock manifold being a better solution over headers. The purpose of the equal length headers is to isolate exhaust gases into seperate pulses from the exhaust valves. Each runner will get it's own self-contained exhaust pulse which, under extreme pressure, will direct flow to the turbine housing in a non-turbulent fashion which should cause faster spoolup and good flow. There is little chance that the exhaust gases would collide with each other and back up into the head with this manifold. The 'log' manifold can, which would play havoc with the efficiency of the motor. Porting the 'log' doesn't take this problem away - it only causes better flow, but the flow is turbulent as opposed to directed like the headers would be.
Just my 2 cents.
I've had excellent results with my Megan headers as far as more torque and faster spoolup. My setup can spool just as fast as a MIVEC in the low end.
-M
Just my 2 cents.
I've had excellent results with my Megan headers as far as more torque and faster spoolup. My setup can spool just as fast as a MIVEC in the low end.
-M
![Guitar](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/guitarist.gif)
-Carl
#11
Have you ever seen Full-Race's dyno comparisons between "Log" manifolds and Equal-Length manifolds? If not, I suggest you do a search. ![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
EDIT:
Here, I will help you out.
http://www.evans-tuning.com/media.html
Click on FR Manifold Test. This is just one example of Equal-Length (significantly) outperforming "Log" manifolds.
-Carl
![Smilie](https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
EDIT:
Here, I will help you out.
http://www.evans-tuning.com/media.html
Click on FR Manifold Test. This is just one example of Equal-Length (significantly) outperforming "Log" manifolds.
-Carl
What exactly does this have to do with OUR manifold?? How about actually searching to see if the ported stocker has been compared to the FR? (hint....it's been done....which is why you see so many people recommending to port the stocker.)
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
The stock evo mani is a very well designed twin scroll manifold. The full race is very well designed manifold as well. But on the evo it is only good for 6whp. Not worth the 1k price if you ask me. especially since the tubular manifolds add so much heat to the engine compartment.