EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Another FPgreen Tuned by The Shop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2007, 05:51 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
 
electricevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
post your graph, lets see it....
Well heres mine. Notice my top end compared to yours...You appear to hold power better up top, but mine seems to spool sooner.

electricevo is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 05:52 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
 
electricevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if it has something to do with MIVEC or our cam difference.
electricevo is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 05:59 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Magnumpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Who Knows
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by homiusang
Mitch, you probably didn't pay a close look into the graphs before you post this

I did. I think it is just a difference in cams and tuning. I could be wrong.

Also what are the other factors like CF, temperature things like that?

Looks like Juniors tune just has less of a smoothing on it but it looks solid from the power and torque.

Mitch Mckee
Magnumpsi is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:06 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
596736's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NNJ
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice numbers
596736 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:10 PM
  #20  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
spln*up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoTec
Your bro tune looks more refined than your Junior tune. Whats with that? The car pulls great but is it smooth? Looks like it needs work.

the graph are on different scale...thats that...and the car drives smoother than before. Remember that i had 272 and now i have S1. to me there were night and day diferrence when driving the car.
spln*up is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:13 PM
  #21  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
spln*up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mitch@VividRacing
I did. I think it is just a difference in cams and tuning. I could be wrong.

Also what are the other factors like CF, temperature things like that?

Looks like Juniors tune just has less of a smoothing on it but it looks solid from the power and torque.

Mitch Mckee
i believe the CF we used was 1.1 this was done on 93oct 24psi tapering to 20 by redline
spln*up is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:17 PM
  #22  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
spln*up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by electricevo
I wonder if it has something to do with MIVEC or our cam difference.
just my thought!!
spln*up is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:29 PM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spln*up
i believe the CF we used was 1.1 this was done on 93oct 24psi tapering to 20 by redline
Awsome numbers mate! this is actually the first graph i see that keeps power all the way to 7500rpm!!! Thats excellent for a green turbo!!! I guess Jr used his "magic" mivec formula!!!
kouzman is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:32 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
mudduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ it's an VIII... nice numbers for a full bolt-on, cammed Green on pump gas
mudduck is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:42 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
staatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lol, now your cam lumps like mine Sam Congrats.
staatz is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 06:54 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mrdevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ct
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Graph looks real good but I didn't expect you to lose 25-50lb torque below 4000rpms. It must pull pretty hard past that though. Comparison runs for fun?
mrdevo is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 07:26 PM
  #27  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by spln*up
Remember that i had 272 and now i have S1.
that explains the loss in torque @ 4k.

i experienced the same thing when playing with hks cams & the gsc s1's. i loss 4k punch/torque, but gained linear power & great drivability.

i illustrated the same thing in my cam compare post i made a while back
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=298419
Aby@MIL.SPEC is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 08:58 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
vboy425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Spec Ops
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
still no ones tell me what gas was this evo on ? we have DD dyno in our shop and i can tell you that that number is pretty high if he was on pump gas. Or maybe our new DD dyno software read lower. Stock evo 9 put 194whp on our dyno. stock evo 8 put 183 on ours.
vboy425 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 23, 2007, 09:13 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Evo11V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tewksbury, NJ
Posts: 1,536
Received 31 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by vboy425
still no ones tell me what gas was this evo on ? we have DD dyno in our shop and i can tell you that that number is pretty high if he was on pump gas. Or maybe our new DD dyno software read lower. Stock evo 9 put 194whp on our dyno. stock evo 8 put 183 on ours.
my 2003 evo 8 stock dynod at 225whp
Evo11V is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 24, 2007, 03:49 AM
  #30  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
spln*up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vboy425
still no ones tell me what gas was this evo on ? we have DD dyno in our shop and i can tell you that that number is pretty high if he was on pump gas. Or maybe our new DD dyno software read lower. Stock evo 9 put 194whp on our dyno. stock evo 8 put 183 on ours.
look at post #21. and it was done on Dyno Dynamics.
spln*up is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 AM.