Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.0 or 2.3 better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2007, 07:43 AM
  #61  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Kordyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's interesting. Really, street racers care about top end the most, street racing is drag racing. So a street RACER would want the high revs and big turbo, while a street DRIVER would want the wider powerband and driveability of a 2.3 setup. I'm torn, I want to pull like nuts on the highway somewhat and not die on a road course. I'm torn between the 35R and 37R, and therefore also torn between the 2.0 and 2.3. I suppose I'll rule out 2.3 and 37R, so my remaining options are 2.0/35R, 2.3/35R, 2.0/37R.
Old Nov 20, 2007, 07:50 AM
  #62  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
11secEVO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also...here's some food for thought...
The norris designs evo 9 SWB. Look at the numbers, esp tq. This is all using a 2.3 crank. They hit 9.2@160mph.

Power: 927bhp & 739lb-ft (VP Import Race Fuel)
Weight 1180Kg (Dry)
Top speed: 215mph + (201.43mph so far )
Best 0-60mph = 2.4 sec
Best 0-100mph = 4.3 sec
Best 0-150mph = 8.00 sec
¼ mile in 9.26 sec @160.09mph on 17" Nitto 555R tyres.
Best 30-130mph = 5.06 sec
(All times recorded at Santa Pod drag strip )

Engine:
ND oversize stainless inlet & exhaust valves
ND spec camshafts
ND valve spring kit
ND Ti retainers
HKS cam pulleys
ND gas flowed race cylinder head
ND 2.3L forged steel crankshaft
Old Nov 20, 2007, 08:03 AM
  #63  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1mbrews8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ga
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.4 0-60 is bad a$$!
Old May 24, 2008, 10:02 PM
  #64  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
aka.ralliart15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Gator Nation(UF)
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curious....Does it have any alternate effect or result in an VIII or a IX if you have either the 2.3 or the 2.0, meaning does one benefit from the other differently from different setups.
Old May 24, 2008, 10:16 PM
  #65  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
LT1runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville Metro
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With a 2.3 ltr really being a 2.25, why not have the best of both worlds. Go with a 2.2 ltr. You can have tourqe and 9500 rev limit. Just destrock a 4G64 block with an eagle 94mm crank. Pick your custom rods and piston combo off of the 94mm crank, and have it all.

Last edited by LT1runner; May 24, 2008 at 10:44 PM.
Old Jun 14, 2008, 09:41 PM
  #66  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
1mbrews8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ga
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i gotta pick something in the next month or so...bump
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HKSUSA
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
7
Jun 24, 2015 12:50 PM
Galant VR-4 #34
Motor Sports
17
Apr 27, 2011 08:03 AM
hypnotiq9000
Evo General
149
May 19, 2010 10:38 AM
Evozster
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
14
Oct 10, 2007 05:58 AM



Quick Reply: 2.0 or 2.3 better?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 PM.